Translate

Showing posts with label s 5 Public Order Act 1986. Show all posts
Showing posts with label s 5 Public Order Act 1986. Show all posts

Monday, 22 June 2015

Does Help for Heroes fall foul of s 5 of the Public Order Act 1986?

http://www.legislation.gov.uk/ukpga/1986/64/section/5

5 Harassment, alarm or distress.

(1)A person is guilty of an offence if he—
(a)uses threatening, abusive or insulting words or behaviour, or disorderly behaviour, or
(b)displays any writing, sign or other visible representation which is threatening, abusive or insulting,within the hearing or sight of a person likely to be caused harassment, alarm or distress thereby.

http://www.helpforheroes.org.uk/how-we-help/

HOW WE HELP OUR HEROES
Our mission is to deliver an enduring national network of support for our wounded and their families. We will inspire and enable those who have made sacrifices on our behalf to achieve their full potential.
The war in Afghanistan may be over, but for those who have suffered life-changing injuries, their battles are just beginning.
We've estimated that, of the 220,560 individuals deployed to Afghanistan and Iraq between 2001 and 2014, up to 75,000 servicemen and women (and their families) may need our support in the future. We will not let them fight these battles alone.


https://www.gov.uk/how-to-choose-a-charity-name

avoid using words or acronyms that could cause offence in English or another language – the commission won’t register charities with names that could be offensive



at No comments:
Labels: , , , , , , , , , ,

Tuesday, 18 March 2014

Man who gave two girls Xmas cards arrested twice

Simon Sheppard today:
I'm in [York Magistrates'] court on Thursday [at 10 am] for the Christmas card. One girl (18, to whom I was only being friendly) claims she saw it and burst into tears, which I don't believe for a moment. Both of them have looked me up on the internet and decided I'm Public Enemy No. 1. Trying not to let it get me down. What a farce the whole thing is!



This was what I also received. 


There was a time when the English prided themselves on their tolerance of eccentricity, but no longer.  

As far as I am concerned, Simon is a harmless eccentric with very definite ideas about Jews which they may not find flattering.  http://www.heretical.com/British/zvsgaol.html To pretend that he is dangerous or peculiarly wicked would be as mistaken as pretending that the uneducated inadequates in the BNP somehow pose a threat to Western democracy. To prosecute and persecute this harmless eccentric at the behest of a spiteful woman suggests a very directed malice.

If you didn't like the card then throw it away, woman.  Why have a man arrested for something like this? Would a man do this sort of thing to another man?   Some women really are disgusting in their vindictiveness. She probably thought he was romantically interested in her and is punishing him by setting the cops on him. Did she feel "violated" that a man with Politically Incorrect views should presume to give her one of his Politically Incorrect Xmas cards? Then he must be thrown into the cells!  If the option of beheading were available for this "outrage", would these vindictive women avail themselves of it?


My view was that it was Xmas, and Simon was a little lonely. Being skint, those were the only Xmas cards he had and so he gave one to her, relishing some sort of contact with a female. To punish a man just for doing this is simply monstrous and I really do not have the words to describe my disgust.  

His account of events:

Arrested by North Yorkshire Police for giving a girl a Christmas card
http://www.heretical.com/sgs-2013/nupd1312.html

I was leaving and she was entering, and we almost collided in the foyer of the local post office. I looked back and she looked back, and unless I’m mistaken, she spoke first. (This was notable: I mention in The Tyranny of Ambiguity instances where females believe they have spoken first while in fact they had merely signalled.) She said she had seen me before, recently. I explained that I cannot recognise faces, it’s called prosopagnosia and it was years before I realised what it was. "Do you work in a shop?" It turned out I had met her while trying to get blank card for the Christmas cards I was quickly running up. I said that if she told me her name I would give her one so she could see it. I would call with one the following Saturday I said, and we parted.

Apparently there were a couple of innocuous earlier encounters, going back months: "I stared at her" and "He said something about the cost of postage as we were leaving the post office at the same time." I have only the dimmest recollection of these, and hadn’t associated them with the girl. I talk to lots of people, young and old, male and female, and always have interesting stories to tell. (Though perhaps my audience doesn’t always agree on their interestingness!)

The contents of that six-page statement, what little I know of it, are really not worthy of being repeated, not here, not anywhere. For instance, an occasion when I was walking past and tapped on her window to give a cheery wave, to be greeted by a wave and a cheerful smile in return, is transformed into me hammering on the window and "frightening her."

Anyway PC Believer’s promise of a quick "in-out" interview was kept but the intimation with it that all would be resolved quickly and I would soon be home was not. I spent a further four hours in the cell.

A Second Christmas Card Arrest
http://www.heretical.com/sgs-2013/nupd1401.html

Indirect Invocation occurs when the authority of a third party is invoked without referring to the second. Examples are calling the police without asking someone to leave, or complaining about the non-repayment of a loan without confronting the debtor directly. It is a female strategy to avoid confrontation, exploit male protective instincts and raise the cost of involvement with them.

an 'ordinary criminal' often commits a hundred crimes and only gets caught for one, while I give Christmas cards to two girls and get dragged off twice.

what gets me is that women are taking men's jobs, doing jobs that men used to do, being paid the same as men, but as soon as something happens they don't like they act like little 8-year-old girls who would jump out of their skin if you said 'Boo' to them. "They," then pointedly to WPC Mysterious, " – you – can't have it both ways" I said.

Below are the salient points:

It was 11am on Christmas Eve and I was just about to get down to the day's activity when a knock was heard at the door. I opened it to find PC Believer and another asking to come in. I replied with a question: "What’s this about?" The response was to inform me that I was under arrest "on suspicion of causing harassment, alarm or distress" and the two barged in.

Arrested again on 16 January
I was just settling down to a tea-break when there was a knock at the door. I opened it to be confronted with – yet again! – the dome-headed visage of PC Believer, accompanied by a policewoman this time. Shortly they had barged in, telling me I was under arrest for "Causing harassment, alarm or distress" and, PC Believer pointedly added, "Publishing written material to stir up racial hatred." "What's that about?" I asked, "I haven't distributed anything." "The Christmas card" was the reply. It was 4:30pm.

It is ridiculous that the police are claiming that causing someone to receive an unwanted Christmas card constitutes a Public Order Offence.  Not only are they wrong in law and logic, what they are doing in my opinion amounts to malicious prosecution.  


I have urged him not to accept the jurisdiction of a magistrates' court whose judgment may not be appealed against.  

I informed him that if he demanded a Crown Court trial the police will feel too stupid to proceed with this ridiculous prosecution, but the poor man is too demoralised to care.  

I really don't know what else to suggest except that anyone who can easily attend York Magistrates' Court at 10 am on Thursday do so, so that he is not entirely alone and the decision of the magistrates not entirely unreported and unnoticed.

https://courttribunalfinder.service.gov.uk/courts/york-magistrates-court

Last year Simon got into trouble for distributing http://www.heretical.com/sgs-2013/sprees.html

In January 2013, while still under licence, I good-naturedly gave a single copy of my 'Spree Killers: The Forefront of Knowledge' article to a local librarian. I had used the library to work on the article, and am rather proud of it, being probably the best I have ever written (I detailed why in my December 2012 news update). This is an account of what happened shortly after. 

and writes about his prison experience at http://www.heretical.com/jailtime/jdiaryp1.html

Simon is Britain's foremost political prisoner. It is no so much what he says about the Jews that the political establishment find objectionable - antisemitism has been endemic in Christian Europe since the Middle Ages - but what he says about the power women have over men in the West, and how they abuse it.

Power corrupts and absolute power corrupts absolutely.


"Out of the corruption of women proceeds the corruption of races; out of the corruption of races, the loss of memory; out of the loss of memory, the loss of understanding, and out of this all evil."  Bhagavad Gita 

His latest book - Sex and Power - can be ordered at http://www.amazon.co.uk/product-reviews/B00HOL2L50/ref=dp_top_cm_cr_acr_txt?ie=UTF8&showViewpoints=1

Photos of Simon
Simon Sheppard offering a mint
Simon Sheppard and The Purple Man of York

Simon Sheppard, Tourist Attraction


at No comments:
Labels: , , ,

Wednesday, 9 January 2013

THOUGHTCRIME and SPEECH CRIME in the UK: Man fined for telling Jewess he hates Jews

http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-england-merseyside-20962123


Philip HayesHayes insisted he was not a racist

Luciana Berger MP abuse: Philip Hayes fined for anti-Semitic remarks


Don't be a fool and opt for a trial in a magistrates court that cannot be appealed. 

Always insist on a Crown Court trial when if you are up for any racially-aggravated public order offence that means you cannot insult anyone and tell them you hate them.   

If you can tell a gentile woman you hate her, then why not a Jewess?

If you can tell a man you hate him, why not a woman?

If can tell a white man you hate him, why not a black, brown or yellow man?

If you can tell a heterosexual man you hate him, why not a homosexual?

If you can tell an able-bodied person you hate him, why not a disabled person?

It is time to repeal s 5 of the Public Order Act.   

Even Peter Tatchell agrees with me.

Oh, and Luciana Berger was the one who doesn't want British Citizens to learn how to defend themselves.  

http://thevoiceofreason-ann.blogspot.co.uk/2012/05/britons-prevented-from-learning-more.html
at No comments:
Labels: , , , ,

Friday, 31 August 2012

Claire Khaw's hopes for UKIP at conference

That they will:


  1. Repeal the Equality Act 2010
  2. Repeal the Human Rights Act 1998
  3. Reintroduce fault into divorce by requiring marriage contracts before people can marry
  4. Reintroduce corporal punishment
  5. Reintroduce capital punishment
  6. Repeal s 5 of the Public Order Act 1986  (Even Peter Tatchell wants to do that!   http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-politics-18084081)
  7. Declare a flat rate income tax of 20%
  8. Abolish inheritance tax
  9. Abolish capital gains tax
  10. Legalise brothel-keeping in every major city   http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Pascha_(brothel)
  11. Abolish the civil partnership
  12. Stop plans to introduce gay marriage
  13. Reintroduce the 11+
  14. Reintroduce single sex secondary schools
  15. Introduce the New Model Comprehensive    http://thevoiceofreason-ann.blogspot.co.uk/2009/02/new-model-comprehensive-by-tories.html
  16. Pass Peter Bone MP's House of Commons Disqualification Bill   http://conservativehome.blogs.com/parliament/2010/10/peter-bone-seeks-to-abolish-the-flatterers-cajolers-and-sometime-bullies-that-are-the-party-whips.html
  17. Lift the ban on Claire Khaw and her associates joining UKIP
  18. Make one woman think tank Claire Khaw Director of Communications
  19. Make one woman think tank Claire Khaw  Policy Consultant
  20. Allow her the opportunity of forgiving  the cowards and hypocrites in UKIP who are fearful, uncertain and exercised about her becoming a member by the simple expedient of inviting her to become leader.  She is guaranteed to graciously accept such an offer by the party and will easily step into the shoes of Nigel Farage and do a better job than him.  
at No comments:
Labels: , , , , , , , , , ,

Saturday, 28 January 2012

What to if you are charged with s 5 of the Public Order Act when all you were doing was being insulting

If all you did was tweet or post something on Facebook by no means put your hands up and elect for trial in a magistrates court.  If you do you will inevitably get convicted with no possibility of appeal.

Always elect a trial by jury.

Your lawyer - if he or she is competent - should be able to point out to the court that you were at no time posing a danger to PUBLIC ORDER as you posted whatever you said that was found to be offensive by whoever you were complaining about, and the police we in fact abusing their powers.

So far, it is not an offence to be racist though you might easily think so with stupid reports like this http://onestowatchmedia.com/2012/01/09/law-student-charged-with-racism-after-collymore-twitter-attack/ by journalists with no legal knowledge.  At no time did Joshua Cryer pose a danger to public order.   As a law student in his final year at Newcastle University, he should be able to argue that, or get his father to hire a lawyer who can do so on his behalf.

Sadly, it is now too late for Susanne Elliott  http://www.theargus.co.uk/news/9482430.Woman_fined_for_abusive_comments_on_Facebook/
because she elected for summary trial, was convicted and apologised.

Don't let shit for brains liberals get away with their totalitarian agenda.

Fight for free speech as if it were your own flesh and your own blood.

No violence is required, only the desire and preparedness to face them down in court.  

When free speech goes, so will reason and common sense and your entire civilisation.

Fight the shit for brains liberal fuckers to the last drop of your blood.  If you can't bring yourself to do this, then the least you can do is elect for a trial by jury if you are charged with this offence when all you did was indulge in common abuse, which should not be a crime deserving of a prison sentence or even be called a crime, should it?

at 2 comments:
Labels: , ,

Totalitarian PC legislation WORSENS race relations more quickly than the existence of anti-immigration parties and groups

Lefties reading this should note this simple fact.

Nothing privileges non-whites against the white working classes more than encouraging non-whites to call the police every time racial offence is given by a white.

Nothing causes more racial resentment than the unfair privileging of a minority group on grounds of race at the expense of free speech and the majority indigenous.

Only shit for brains feminised liberals in denial would implement such a policy with increasing ferocity at the expense of the civil liberties and freedom of expression of white Britons.

And only shit for brains liberals will pretend to be surprised when race relations worsen.  
at No comments:
Labels: , ,
Subscribe to: Posts (Atom)

Weak men lacking conviction pretending to be Christian to hold on to their failed ancestral religion

Locus standi 1:00  Spergs https://radicalisedrabbi.blogspot.com/2026/05/talking-to-sonata-d8f.html 4:00  My areas of interest 5:00  Stream o...