THE VOICE OF REASON
Solon, (born c. 630 BCE—died c. 560 BCE), Athenian statesman, known as one of the Seven Wise Men of Greece (the others were Chilon of Sparta, Thales of Miletus, Bias of Priene, Cleobulus of Lindos, Pittacus of Mytilene, and Periander of Corinth). Solon ended exclusive aristocratic control of the government, substituted a system of control by the wealthy, and introduced a new and more humane law code. He was also a noted poet.
When your feminist matriarchy has normalised fornication, there is no urgency for men to marry women of their own race.
When you have no fault divorce, it is not safe for men to marry.
When you refuse to marry the women of your own race because you can get sex before marriage, men and women stay single and women with thwarted maternal instincts treat foreign men and foreign children as their babies, or they become man-hating cat ladies who vote for pro-immigration parties to spite their men for not marrying them. Or they are unmarried mothers left to rely on the welfare state which needs to be funded by the taxes immigrant workers pay the state.
When did you last hear any anti-immigration party talk about restoring the patriarchy or protecting the institution of marriage?
In fact, they point black refuse to talk about it because they are all morally compromised: Anne Marie Waters of For Britain is a lesbian spinster and Mark Collett of the Patriotic Alternative is an unmarried father.
3:00 Jay says it is not his place to offer solutions or even consider them using Truth, Logic and Morality. That is why, even when a solution is presented to him for approval, he rejects it for no reason other than of a child refusing to take its medicine.
6:00 The corrupt moral and political system
7:00 A one party theocracy governed by the principles of Secular Koranism
8:00 Acknowledging that we live in a matriarchy and the moral imperative of destroying it
Jews have a continuing religious obligation to exterminate the Amalekite. If they no longer think it is their place to do so now, the least they can do is DEFINE who fits into this category. In my view, the Amalekite would be those who a) live in a matriarchy and want to continue living in one b) deny that they live in a matriarchy c) refuse to have a full and frank discussion of what is a matriarchy eg Mark Collett, Millennial Woes, Simon Harris etc A matriarchy is a society that prioritises the preferences of the unmarried mother who casually conceived and parented her illegitimate offspring over the legitimate preferences of the married father who wants to properly parent his legitimate offspring with a view to the continuation and advancement of his society and civilisation. Muslims only have a duty to wage jihad in the sense of struggling with themselves to pluck up the courage to enjoin what is good and forbid what is evil as resented minorities in the West. Sadly, there are no Muslim men prepared to or capable of discussing how matriarchy is to be defined and whether it is evil.
10:00 The modus operandi of the matriarchy is to bribe men with extramarital sex to keep them quiescent under its oppression. No feminist has ever supported slut-shaming. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Slut-shaming
Senior men in positions of power are too afraid of their female partners divorcing them, accusing them of a historic sexual offence or causing a fuss that they walk on eggshells on matters that need a full and frank discussion.
14:00 Marriage and family values in a patriarchy governing in the national interest
15:00 A patriarchy is more able to deal with Truth, Logic and Morality to solve and avoid problems than a matriarchy of triggered snowflakes melting in the sun.
19:00 Taboos and sacred cows in the Western political establishment
21:00 Mark Collett and Simon Harris and his guests talking about nothing that matters because they don't want to discuss religion and politics but indulge in nostalgia
22:00 Anticipating the feminine preference
24:00 Before something can be done, it has to be proposed. Before it can be proposed, it has to be articulated. Before it can be articulated, it has to be conceived. I have conceived of Secular Koranism. It is time for educated, courageous, honourable and influential men in the West to discuss its practicability and viability.
25:00 Morally-compromised men like Mark Collett
26:00 No fault divorce
27:00 Faith
28:00 The great cathedrals of Europe eg La Sagrada Familia of Barcelona
30:00 Masculinity is a state of mind prepared to defend patriarchal moral values ie marriage and family values
31:00 Morality is a system of rules designed to keep your group together and apart from others.
32:00 Infantilised men
33:00 Men who do not deserve to live in an advanced civilisation
34:00 The moral corruption of Western Man
35:00 Representations of soon to be extinct masculinity: Lord Sumption and Steve Baker
35:00 The concept of God exists, and that is enough for the purpose of practical politics.
36:00 The teleological approach to God
37:00 The rule of law came with the Ten Commandments.
38:00 Which society will do better over time? a) Patriarchy restricting legal recreational sex only to couples married to each other b) Matriarchy allowing sexual liberation from the rules of marriage and good parenting
39:00 Elizabeth II
40:00 Charles should have been king in 1986 when he was 38, when the Queen should have retired at 60.
44:00 Dowagerism
45:00 The British government is behaving like a dithering old woman who cannot make up her mind about anything.
48:00 Fact of life: there will always be more sperm than eggs.
49:00 Marriage is for legitimate children.
50:00 The burdens of patriarchy on men degenerates of the matriarchy are reluctant to assume
51:00 The neurosis and degeneracy of ADHD Western Man who cannot discuss any important subject honestly and fully without going into denial or becoming a triggered snowflake melting in the sun
53:00 The term "good husbandry" is a clue that the female of the species is indeed a resource for the male of the species required to husband resources rationally and fairly if he wishes his society and civilisation to remain in existence and apart from others.
54:00 Monogamy is both a humane and eugenic system of apportioning the resource of eggs for sperm.
55:00 Marriageability
57:00 Losing control over one's progeny
58:00 Being a stranger to your legitimate offspring
1:01:00 Competition between groups of men and amongst men
1:02:00 Patriarchy would give women who want to be mothers of legitimate children a better supply of marriageable men.
1:03:00 If matriarchy is the problem, then patriarchy is the solution. If patriarchy is the destination, then theocracy is the vehicle.
1:04:00 Men who do not want to become married fathers or create social conditions favourable to married fatherhood are clearly men who are nihilists heedless of posterity. Moral Nihilists do not deserve to have their degenerate preferences taken into account by governments who wish to govern in the national interest. In fact, Moral Nihilists do not even deserve to live in an advanced civilisation. Since most men are liberal, most liberals are atheists, and most atheists are nihilists, it looks like Western Man will not be living in an advanced civilisation for much longer.
Does Mark Collett - former BNP member infamous for his controversial views on Jews - have Jewish heritage while being unaware of it? Years ago, I pointed out to Mark that he did look as if he could be Jewish. Indeed, he looked so Jewish that I assumed that I was not the first person to point this out to him. He remained silent.
Rabbi Mizrachi himself admits that there are many people who think they are Jews but are not, and many people who think they are gentile but are in fact Jews. One could end up being a self-hating Jew. Self-loathing has long been regarded as a sign of mental illness and a feature of living in the early 21st century West is its ever rising levels of mental illness.
The tragedy of Oedipus Rex is about a man who didn't know his parents. He ended up murdering his father in a road rage incident and having sex with a cougar that turned out to be his mother.
If we didn't know who our parents are, we could end up committing incest with our sibling, sugar daddy or cougar.
Isn't it already painfully obvious that condoning casual sex would inevitably lead to dysgenics and degeneracy?
Interestingly, it was the the late Jewish baronet Keith Joseph who pointed out to the British in 1974 in his Edgbaston speech that they were destroying their "human stock" by condoning unmarried parenthood. He paid dearly for pointing out the obvious when he found himself apologising for his speech. A man who was widely regarded as a Prime Minister in waiting found himself serving under Margaret Thatcher, Britain's first female Prime Minister - the first milestone of matriarchy. Before Keith Joseph, it was Enoch Powell who destroyed his career by pointing out the obvious. Unlike Joseph, he did not apologise. https://www.theguardian.com/politics/wintour-and-watt/2010/nov/25/conservatives-davidcameron
Why won't nationalists talk about marriage and family values instead of endlessly obsessing about Jews?
We know who we is in power by those we dare not criticise, and I don't mean the Jews. They now have a representative in Downing Street, sharing the bedroom of the British Prime Minister.
Blue Labour thinking, with its emphasis on community-led solutions, is being touted as the party's version of the Big Society, and it's also possible that his emphasis on "family, faith and flag" will be a means of Labour outflanking the coalition on the right. The feminazis of the Labour Party destroyed his career. https://www.theguardian.com/politics/2011/jul/19/lord-glasman-radical-traditionalist
5:00 Western culture then and now
7:00 Millennial Woes
9:45 Mark Collett referring to the accusations of sexual impropriety against Millennial Woes
11:00 "no longer invited and no longer welcome at Patriotic Alternative events in any capacity" - accused then convicted ... but not apparently subjected to anything remotely resembling due process, without anything so much as a charge sheet
"a great deal of care" - care has been taken to believe and take seriously the complainant's allegations
"allegations that she is underage and has been groomed" "we have fully supported her" "we have been in constant contact with her and have fully supported her and we have take great lengths to listen to her and view the other allegations that have been made by different women"
12:00 "Recently, I became a father myself to a little girl"
13:00 We don't know exactly what MW did, but he has been found guilty, apparently.
14:00 "one of these allegations"
15:00 The complainant and the accused met online, before the conference. Therefore the Patriotic Alternative Conference is not a knocking shop where girls are procured for the leading lights of nationalism who on this occasion went a little too far, like a fox in a hen house, crazed by the abundance made available to him, metaphorically killing more chickens than he could actually carry away?
17:00 "age, sex or any other characteristics"
19:00 "no longer invited and no longer welcome" - MW accused and already convicted without due process since the allegations were not even specified
21:00 "a great deal of care" will be take over your complaints, but only if you are female.
22:00 "We are taking them very very seriously."
23:00 "grooming"
27:00 "allegations made by different women"
28:00 What if Mark Collett's only child is a son?
30:00 Is Mark Collett capable of judicious impartiality?
31:00 to 33:00 Ignore this because this is a repeat.
33:00 A list of detailed accusations and his accusers should be obtained by the accused.
49:00 Is an accusation as good as a conviction? Is this a society you want to live in?
@MarkACollett The same people behind a lot of the current Millennial Woes rumours have you in their sights, too. This is the same person who, just yesterday, was laughing about how many of the Woes rumours he had fabricated were now being believed: https://t.co/pC2UmSDLXU
1:34 The beginning of the stream that is being restreamed
2:00 The sexual history of Millennial Woes
3:00 Sexting begins at secondary school
4:00 A degenerate culture of casual sex
5:00 Gender relations amongst nationalists
6:00 The late Max Clifford died in prison in 2017. https://www.theguardian.com/media/2019/apr/02/max-clifford-conviction-upheld
7:00 Patriotic Alternative
8:00 Anthony Weiner sexting scandals https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Anthony_Weiner_sexting_scandals
9:00 Millennial Woes
10:00 Code of conduct
11:00 Samurai code of honour https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Bushido
13:00 Bald men fighting over a comb join social clubs with a membership antisemites, Islamophobes and racists they are pleased to call political parties
14:00 Millennial Woes would be more useful to politics asking and answering philosophical questions by perhaps engaging with me than trying to stay on the right side of men of mediocre intellect unable to solve problems using Truth, Logic and Morality fighting like ferrets in a sack
John Tyndall:
"The little men who talk about uniting Britain, the white race, Europe or whatever you prefer, cannot even unite themselves. Any talk of a common fight against a common enemy is treated by them as a sinister plot to undermine their own precious private identities."
The Right "... is an incohesive mass of jealously squabbling tin-pot Caesars, more concerned with the pursuance of private vendettas than with the aim of ultimate national salvation."
15:00 STDs
16:00 Prince Andrew
17:00 "There but for the grace of God go I."
18:00 The kiss and tell culture and honey traps
19:00 A YouTuber on YouTube
20:00 Honour amongst thieves
21:00 Mark Collett refuses to discuss religion. His beliefs are closer to animism but he pretends to be Christian.
23:00 For Britain
24:00 Instead of calling the roofer when their roof leaks, plebeian nationalists blame other householders and conduct feuds against each other,
28:00 Patriotic Alternative Spring 2020 Conference, 14th March 2020 https://www.patrioticalternative.org.uk/conference_14th_march_2020
30:00 Gender relations in the alt-right and outside it
4:00 A strike for my video on "The Supremacy of Jewish Ideas" was what made my stream on MW go offline on my main channel.
6:00 Rigging the game against dissidents of the West
7:00 YouTube dismissing appeals against strikes without explanation
8:00 Even absolute dictators need to know if their policies are working and this can only be done by engaging with the governed.
9:00 Group solidarity
12:00 No specific accusation, only innuendo and lurid speculation
13:00 A charge sheet
14:00 The Fifth Amendment
15:00 It is always your own side close enough to stab us in the back that we should always be watching out for.
16:00 Starting yet another nationalist micro-party is evidence of stupidity
17:00 Traditional Britain Group dare not say why I am persona non grata.
17:30 Mark Collett and his abuse of power
18:00 Western men sending dick pics to Western women they want to fornicate with is what passes for a courtship now in the degenerate West
19:00 The cheap thrill Western Man gets from sending an image of his erect sex organ to Western Woman is based on not knowing if it will meet with her requirements.
20:00 Monica Lewinsky
22:00 An opportunity for me to prove myself in the field of reputational management
24:00 A news blackout has been declared on me.
25:00 Marriage is eugenic.
26:00 The price of sex http://thevoiceofreason-ann.blogspot.com/2015/03/claire-khaws-class-and-gender-theory-of.html
27:00 How men and women are programmed
28:00 Recreational sex should be legal only for married heterosexual couples married to each other.
30:00 Ed Dutton
31:00 Using Truth, Logic and Morality to solve and avoid problems
32:00 Know thy enemy.
33:00 Millennial Woes and his philosophical questions
34:00 Asking and answering philosophical questions using Truth, Logic and Morality would be more helpful than establishing micro-parties doomed to failure created only as a source of income by the intellectually dishonest antisemite who refuses to engage in an honest debate about the issues for fear of losing the argument. The alt-right could be the unofficial think tank of the government and I am already a One Woman Think Tank at the service of Westerners troubled by the incompetence, corruption, dishonesty and the directionlessness of their governments as well as the inadequacy of their political system now that their religion has failed.
The modern Post-Christian Westerner is now traumatised by the effects of Liberalism and is bereft of moral guidance while filled with self-loathing and neurosis at the idea that his ancestors were forcibly converted to Christianity. The centuries of antisemitism and Islamophobia he has unconsciously ingested with his Christianity as well as his own racial chauvinism makes him unable to stomach any of the Abrahamic faiths. However, like the victim of child sexual abuse, he feels the need to do in turn victimise others in order to pass on his pain and rage at being so comprehensively deceived by his government for so many centuries.
There is nothing in the Koran that says Muslims are to kill non-Muslims because they are non-Muslims.
Any verse in the Koran that talks about killing non-Muslims are battle orders.
Those who most object to war verses of the Koran are invariably citizens of NATO member states and these nations are infamous for their imperialism and militarism, having participated in two World Wars ending in the nuking of non-combatants in two different Japanese cities.
Prior to that there were the Wars of National Unification in Europe after the 1848 Revolutions which were primarily based on the rejection of absolute monarchs after the French Revolution.
Prior to that were the European Wars of Religion which was about European nations trying to leave the Catholic Empire of Europe in rather the same way Britain tried for three years to leave the EU. Let us hope it will not take as long for the situation to stabilise as it took for the Protestant succession to become secure - about 141 years from the death of Henry VIII to the Glorious Revolution in 1688.
Europeans who became Americans to escape Christian on Christian religious persecution pursued their religious persecution against each other in the New World with the non-denominational Puritans and the non-denominational Quakers persecuting and killing each other.
Then the Americans waged a civil war on each other, which was really an American War of Unification, which was its first baby step towards global domination.
Yet it is always US and UK citizens that seem to regard a few battle orders in the Koran with condemnation and horror, as if they had never heard such a thing as killing your enemies in battle. If they could forbid Muslims from killing their enemies in battle, they would, while reserving their right to take all measures, proportionate and disproportionate to deal with their enemies eg the bombing of Nagasaki and Hiroshima, which would have found no verse in the Koran justifying it.
It has been said that Christianity and Hypocrisy march hand in hand, presumably because Christians have for centuries been practising Supreme Idolatry while condemning it in others.
Now, in the 21st century, Westerners have begun to notice that Christianity and Liberalism (and the sexual liberation it promotes from the rules of marriage and patriarchy) are now indistinguishable. Since the New Testament says nothing clearly, Christians are excused this chief defect of their religion.
On the question of idolatry, there is a strange silence. It seems Christians are now so invested in their idolatry and chauvinism they think they have no duty to answer questions on the idolatry of worshipping an executed revolutionary as the co-equal of the supreme and eternal Abrahamic God which they should know from the Ten Commandments has been specifically and explicitly forbidden.
On the question of the purpose of religion, political activists who call themselves nationalists refuse to answer my question at all. Perhaps they can be excused for not being theologians, philosophers or intellectuals of any standing. Perhaps they are at heart united by nothing more than their common ancestral hatreds of anyone who is above them even if they are of the same race, or of a different race to them, especially if they are Jews and Muslims. To call them nationalists is to dignify their thinking too much, since they are not interested in discussing the national interest, only complaining about foreigners and Muslims whom they think the Jews let in.
In their minds, Christianity and liberal democracy were perfect and working perfectly, until the Jews arrived and ruined everything.
Their history only goes back to living memory of how things were in the 1950s before the immigrants arrived.
They seen to know nothing about history beyond that, certainly nothing about the European Wars of Religion. They are mostly ignorant of the extent and nature of the British Empire. This collective ignorance or loss of memory is to be pitied and condemned because it prevents the problems of the present from being understood as the actions of the past.
Anything wrong with their government now is entirely the fault of Jews and Muslims whom they perceive to be treated better than they - the now redundant formerly working classes - who are the entitled claimants of the welfare state. They seem surprised that they are being warehoused for extinction since they are no longer perceived as for the purpose of working by their government.
It is impossible to get anyone at all to engage honestly and rationally as well as discuss matters in good faith, because they are mostly low status, low education and low income, with a myriad of personal problems and a corridor of locked rooms and cupboards full of skeletons they prefer not to talk about.
Anyone who has a different view will not be engaged with and effectively boycotted as I am boycotted by Mark Collett and Millennial Woes. Their echo chamber will not endure the presence of anyone asking a simple question they cannot answer honestly and clearly without giving up their racist, antisemitic and Islamophobic position: what is religion for and will just their magic white skin protect them from bad government?
When I recommend my holistic solution of Secular Koranism, they will say Muslims do not follow the Koran. But the same could be said of Jews who do not follow the Torah. As for the New Testament, I think Christians are excused from following the New Testament properly because nothing is said clearly in it.
The obvious solution to Muslims not following the Koran properly is to follow the Koran properly.
The solution to Christians not having a scripture with clear instructions is to replace the defective scripture of their failed religion with one that does have clear instructions meant for gentiles who wish to worship the Abrahamic God without falling foul of the prohibition against idolatry.
Being dishonest and unprincipled men who were never impressed on the necessity in gentlemen to have a strict regard for truth and upholding codes of honour, they will not be admitting the truth, submitting to reason or engaging in the discussion of any moral or political question in good faith.
Their most immediate short term objective is to go to their graves with their incoherent and paranoid beliefs intact, because they only see things in the short term, being mostly atheists and nihilists who do not care what happens to their society after they are dead and feel no duty to posterity, even if some of them have managed to have legitimate offspring.
Their most immediate objective is therefore not to be seen to lose the argument to me and the best tactic to avoid losing to me is not to engage at all or answer my question, which they pretend not to hear: what is religion for?
To: ecdutton
Sent: Monday, 14 October 2019, 18:21:12 BST
Subject: May I know if you have heard of Secular Koranism?
************
To: ecdutton
Sent: Monday, 14 October 2019, 18:37:27 BST
Subject: Why should we not worship the Abrahamic God and/or follow His laws?
*************
To: ecdutton
Sent: Monday, 14 October 2019, 18:47:03 BST
Subject: Is the White Anglo Saxon Protestant (WASP) a tribe?
**************
To: ecdutton
Cc: Mark Collett ; Millennial Woes
Sent: Friday, 18 October 2019, 12:24:18 BST
Subject: Accelerationism at the North of England Patriotic Alternative Conference 2019
Dear Dr Dutton
Would you confirm that this topic was being discussed? I assume that the reason why no videos have been released on the event other than the bland one by Mark Collett and Laura Towler is simply because they would fall foul of hate speech laws.
Would you also confirm that the reason you are ignoring me is because you have been told not to engage with me by Mark Collett and Millennial Woes in order to deprive Secular Koranism of the oxygen publicity?
How ethical is this considering you are what would be considered an educated man as well as both a theologian and anthropologist?
I don't think paganism is feasible as a solution because I don't think enough people believe in it or and I don't see it spreading fast enough. Christianity has had the stuffing knocked out of it to say the least over the last century so I don't know if it can recover or if it can recover in time. The other option is atheism which just is where we are just now anyway and then the fourth option is Islam and there are people who think that we're just going to inevitably become Islamic and that has various implications. Would we be assimilated into the Muslim immigrants' demographic group in which case it would be their version of Islam that ruled Europe or would it be that we adopted Islam and modified it as we did with with Christianity? Would it be our version of Islam? I might get some flack for saying this stuff or even for entertaining this. I'm just sort of putting it over there, just speculating on how are we going to resist Islam and what are we gaining by resisting Islam. Are we gaining nihilism and just more vapid consumerism or are we regaining strength and vitality somehow? Again, these are all questions that other people need to address and I can only put the question out there but I do think that it's something that we we can't afford to just ignore. I remember at the TBG in December there was a guy who really got very irate with me for suggesting that maybe Islam will be the only way out of the nihilism, out of globohomo, and if it will be so then the choice is "Do you want Islam or do you want globohomo?" so not a fucking nice choice but if you want to avoid that then you have to find a way to resist Islam and resist globohomo, and as I say, I don't see what that would be at this point. Maybe something will materialise.
Perhaps this is really a fight between the religious against the irreligious. God if He exists would favour the former. For nationalists to get what they want they would have to restore the patriarchy, and the patriarchy can only be restored with marriage and family values. https://t.co/7mmxJfU4un
The clear blue water between feminists and nationalists against Jews and Muslims is that the former condone fornication and are dysgenic, while the latter practice marriage and family values which is eugenic. Whom would God favour if He exists? The answer is obvious.
The least a religion should do for you is to ensure that most parents in your society are married parents. If Christianity can no longer do that, it is a clear sign that it should be taken out with the trash. https://t.co/DfyW07YtFs
"The result is that in Britain in 2012, 47.5 per cent of children were born outside marriage, expected to become a majority in 2016." Jews have warned heedless Christians over the years. https://t.co/3X7WmQH0mu No nationalist has expressed any concern over widespread bastardy.
Jews over the years have stuck their necks out for the gentile, but this is never acknowledged by the antisemites who either cannot see it or refuse to acknowledge it. https://t.co/0UWhWXvq2d
Keith Joseph was another Jew who stuck his neck out over unmarried mothers. https://t.co/cqeGtzr8md Is there a single nationalist who has proposed the abolition of no fault divorce? They seem deliberately blind to the connection between bastardy and degeneracy.
Nationalists do not seem aware of the bad impression angry low status, low education and low income bachelors who are obviously unmarriageable create. Worst of all, they are so intellectually dishonest they call me mad for raising the issue of widespread bastardy and degeneracy.
Instead of discussing social, political and economic, low-courage nationalists prefer to dwell on their pet hatreds of Jews and Muslims. It seems agreeing with each other on how much they hate Jews, Muslims and non-whites is *the only thing* that binds them together.
As if their low-courage tactic of only complaining and never proposing solutions were not bad enough, when solutions are suggested, they collectively conspire to suppress and ignore them. Not discussing my solutions has been the major nationalist preoccupation for a decade now.
The moment British men show they are prepared to end the creation of widespread bastardy and show that they are men worth marrying, they will get their country back. However, it seems they are currently content to continue hating Jews, Muslims, non-whites and immigrants.
Jewish motives in encouraging uncontrolled immigration for the Western gentile are hinted at in Mark Collett's video questioning the validity of egalitarianism and feminism.
Is it true that Jews are guilty of malign encouragement to encourage the gentile to become degenerate so he may be more easily tricked and exploited? This must be what is meant by the stumbling block.
Leviticus 19:14:
You shall not curse the deaf nor place a stumbling block before the blind; you shall fear your God - I am your Lord.
If this is true that Jews are forever putting before the stupid and blind gentile stumbling blocks, why does the gentile allow this to happen?
Because his political classes are stupid or in collusion with the Jews?
Because his political classes don't care about him?
Or is it because Christianity and liberal democracy are both kaput?
After all, the rules of Christianity come from the Old and New Testament and both promote patriarchal moral values.
Temple Judaism was suffering from a parasitic priesthood in the same way as 21st century Christianity. This ended in Jews who being deprived of their homeland for 2000 years when the Romans expelled them Israel.
Christians are in the rather more fortunate position of being able to use Islam to protect themselves from usurers. Usury is of course the source of Jewish power over the gentile.
The banning of usury would also benefit Jews by preventing them from getting into trouble with the gentile when he realises he can no longer pay back what he owes to the usurious Jew and takes the usual course of action over the centuries: pogrom.
It is odd that Jews are not already promoting Islam as a religion for the gentile since it is their religious obligation to remind the gentile that his laws have fallen dangerously below the minimum moral standards of the Noahide laws.
The late Rabbi Menachem Mendel Schneerson, the last leader of Chabad-Lubavitch Hasidism wrote:
'We must do everything possible to ensure that the seven Noahide laws are observed. If this can be accomplished through force or through other kinder and more peaceful means through explaining to non-Jews that they should accept God’s wishes [we should do so]…Anyone who is able to influence a non-Jew in any way to keep the seven commandments is obligated to do so, since that is what God commanded Moses our teacher' (“Sheva Mitzvot Shel Benai Noach,” Hapardes 59:9 7-11, 5745)
It seems obvious to me that people are their own worst enemies and cause themselves terrible suffering when they break their own rules. But this problem is easily solved: Jews just have to acknowledge that they owe the gentile a duty of care ie warning and reminding him when his laws no longer conform to the minimum moral standards of the Noahide laws. Those who call themselves Christians need to be honest about whether they really believe that an executed revolutionary is the co-equal of the supreme and eternal Abrahamic God.
If they really believe it, they are perhaps too credulous. If they only pretend to believe it to keep their positions in the Christian priesthood, they are obviously corrupt.
If they reject the Trinity as a patent absurdity while still believing in God, then they are closer to being a Muslim than a Jew.
Even an atheist is closer to being a Muslim than he is to being a Christian who is not only required to believe in God's existence, but that an executed revolutionary is the co-equal of the Abrahamic God.
I would like to discuss the following, which I think should be of interest to the alt-right:
Has Christianity failed?
If Christianity has not failed, why are most Westerners Post-Christians complaining about being exploited by Jews and invaded by Muslims?
Is it not obvious that religion is crucial to social cohesion and male solidarity enabling men to co-operate with each other to defend their nation against the eternal enemies of civilisation: sluts and socialists?
Is it not obvious that the purpose of patriarchy is to support marriage?
Marriage is the rearing of the next generation in optimum conditions, not something to be given to LGBT couples to use as a piece of paper to give to each other as love tokens to their current object of love.
Is it not obvious that patriarchy can only be supported by theocracy?
Only in a patriarchy would enough good strong men be produced to defend the national interest.
If you agree with me about the failure of Christianity, do you think it needs to be replaced?
If you agree with me that Christianity needs to be replaced, what do you think it should be replaced with?
If you disagree with me that the religion that should replace failed Christianity is Islam, then what do you think is the religion that should replace it?
Judaism?
Hinduism?
Buddhism?
Bahaiism?
Scientology?
Rastafarianism?
The worship of white Nordic gods?
The worship of Greek or Roman gods?
If Islam is "Judaism Lite" and the thought of submitting to Islam is oppressive, this seems to suggest that Judaism would be much too hard for white nationalists. After all, the Koran does not prescribe the death penalty for breaking the Sabbath.
Islam is in fact the easier option. As long as we are clear about this.
If it is none of the above, then can I assume that you are planning to start a new religion? If this is your plan, may I point out the following:
As we all know, Judaism - the first Abrahamic faith - has had its ups and downs: Jews have been kicked out of their homeland three times. Also, it must be remembered that ancient of kingdom of Israel was in decline as soon as King Solomon died.
Christianity took about 350 years to be successful, from Christians being thrown to the lions and the Roman emperor Constantine converting to Christianity. Not having a plan means condemning your children, grandchildren and descendants to a New Dark Age of several centuries.
The Islamic empire was acquired with relatively ease, presumably because it seemed such an obviously good idea that the pagans of Arabia didn't fight that hard against it.
Q: Would Eddy Butler consider Spanish reverts to Islam traitors or ethno-masochists even though Spain used to be under the rule of the Abbasid caliphate and had been an Islamic country for seven hundred years, which is greater than it has been Christian?
A: Eddy Butler answers:
"Reverts is an expression used by Moslem freaks to describe anyone who converts. The original Spanish converts were mostly forced. So any new convert is an ethno masochist who probably suffers from mental problems."
Q: Why does Eddy Butler think that it is mentally ill for an infidel to adopt Islam but mentally sane to adopt Christianity?
A: I'll ask him.
Q: So if Eddy Butler thinks that new British Muslims are mentally ethno-masochists, then what does he think of the Muslim English Democrats candidate David Dawud Haslett?
A: I'll ask him.
Q: "So any new [Muslim] convert is an ethno masochist who probably suffers from mental problems."- 😂😂 Does Eddy not realise that Christianity conquered Spain after the Islamic era and forced everyone to convert and persecuted anyone who refused to be convert? Spanish Christians must be mentally ill.
A: Eddy Butler answers:
"Spain was Christian. It was invaded by ethnic aliens with an alien religion and culture - Arab Moslems. They forcibly converted many inhabitants to Islam. Spain was reconquered for Western civilisation and became Christian again. North Western Europeans who voluntarily decide to convert are ethno masochists who almost certainly suffer from mental health issues. Also most of Spain was reconquered well before the final fall of Granada in 1492 - and a lot (perhaps most) Moslems were expelled, or should i say repatriated."
Q: Under the Abbasids, Christians and Jews, despite some hardship were still allowed to practise their face, which came to show that the Muslims respected the local culture. The Catholic conquerors literally exterminated everyone who was not an affirming Christian which then led to the Inquisition.
A: Eddy Butler answers:
"If you go back far enough obviously all of Europe was not Christian. Only a buffoon would think it remarkable to state that. However Christianity was not adopted via an ethnic alien invasion and was adapted to be suitable to the local population. Roman Spain would have had a very strong Christian component prior to the Germanic invasions."
Q: Eddy does not realise that Spain was pagan before the Visgoths invaded who first imposed Arianism and then Catholicism, which persecuted Jews and Arians under Roderic- this is what led Julian of Ceuta to side with the Abbasids to overthrow King Roderic. Christianity was as an alien creed itself.
A: Eddy Butler answers:
"If you go back far enough obviously all of Europe was not Christian. Only a buffoon would think it remarkable to state that. However Christianity was not adopted via an ethnic alien invasion and was adapted to be suitable to the local population. Roman Spain would have had a very strong Christian component prior to the Germanic invasions."
Q: I think that Eddy Butler is seriously mentally ill, he just does not know how to think for himself, he is extremely biased and has a very autistic issue with people when they choose Islam as their new way of life. He needs help...Desperately!
A: I'll pass this on.
Q: Roman Spain would have had a very strong pagan heritage which was replaced by invading christianising Visgoths or imperialistic Romans importing a Middle Eastern Israelite cult called Christianity. Christianity was enforced but then adopted, Islam was enforced and then adopted too.
A: OK
Q: Does Eddy Butler not realise that the biggest mentally ill acts in our communities are not Islamic reversion but drug addiction, alcoholism, fornication, homosexuality, illegitimacy etc? Would he want his children to be drug addicted MCSF fornicators [Morally-Compromised Slut-Fuckers] or virgin reverts to Islam?
A: Probably not to both questions.
Q: Would Eddy Butler say that Napoléon Bonaparte was an ethno-masochist traitor for suggesting the creation of a European community based on Koranic principles?
A: I would support a European Islamic Union governed by the principles of Secular Koranism.
A: Eventually, the political landscape will be divided between those who are pro-theocracy (ie men and women who know that the preservation of civilised life depends on people who want to become the good parents of legitimate children and acknowledge the contribution good parents make to society) and those who are pro-feminist (ie unmarriageable men and women who have no intention or prospect of becoming parents of legitimate children and who won't even acknowledge that children are better off brought up by their two married parents living together).
Q: So what will Eddy Butler and Mark Collett think of Arthur Wagner? Is he an ethno-masochist race traitor?
A: Neither of them dare to discuss whether Western Man needs a religion now that they know Christianity is kaput.
Q: Should Mark Collett and Eddy Butler not join the British Democratic Party?
A: I will ask them.
Q: Could you please ask Eddy and Mark what they think?
Q: No, could you please ask Mark and Eddy what they think about Arthur Wagner's reversion?
A: Eddy Butler: "Clearly the german is mentally ill"
Q: Why are Eddy and Mark Collett not members of the British Democratic Party?
A: I'll ask them.
Q: I still have not heard Eddy Butler's conclusion on David Haslett's reversion to Islam.
A: He says he can't be bothered to answer the questions of cranks.
Q: Interesting. Eddy can answer questions related to Arthur Wagner and Islamic Spain but remains silent on David Haslett.
A: We can guess the reason, can't we?
Q: By Eddy's logic, is Frank Forte a mentally ill ethno-masochist race traitor for converting to Buddhism?
A: I think Eddy only feels threatened by Islam.
Q: If Eddy Butler lived in 4th century Rome, which would he choose: remain a Roman pagan worshipping the Emperor as a divine incarnation and all the other gods or convert to the Middle Eastern Judaean cult, Christianity, worshipping Jesus/ Yeshua, the crucified King of Judaea as a divine incarnation?
Eddy Butler answers:
"I would be the God Emperor. The Divine Edward - the first Germanic Emperor."
Q: So basically Eddy Butler would have rejected Christianity after all due to it being just a foreign ideology set to overthrow his might of rule. So there you have it, the Romans, Germanics and Greeks were ethno-masochist race traitors for abandoning paganism for Christianity.
A: You make an excellent point.
It is the responsibility of the leader to choose a new moral system if the current one is kaput or not good enough compared to the rival peoples around you.
Q: Eddy is a fool and hypocrite for condemning British Muslim reverts but not British Buddhist converts like Frank Forte. He says Christianity is part of our way of life even though right at the start he would have rejected Christianity as foreign and conversion as treason.
A: He is rather unprincipled, I'm afraid. His politics is all about having the highest possible status and avoiding being seen to be on the margins. This is why he joined the English Democrats though I begged him not to, for the sake of his reputation. Converting to Islam would be seen by his associates as surrender to the enemy and it is for this reason only that he shows his hatred and contempt for Muslims. Nationalism unsupported by a belief in a deity is ignoble, unprincipled, immoral, degenerate, ignorant, arrogant, racist, anti-Semitic, hateful and, worst of all, plebeian. This is why nationalists are shunned and the reason why I advocate theocracy under the divine law of the Abrahamic God, supposed to be omnipotent and perfectly moral.
"Judaism is divine ethno-nationalism and Islam divine civic nationalism." Discuss.
Joe Owens demands that Mark Collett tell him what he means by "European traditionalism". I asked Mark too what he means by that and got no answer either.
Could it be that European traditionalism is a euphemism for Christianity?
Is Christianity the solution though? Most nationalists are atheists believing in sexual liberation who have no intention of uncompromisingly defending the institution of marriage or shaming sluts, so it is hard to imagine how they might have the moral authority to impose a Christian theocracy. There would be the vexed question of whether the Christianity involved would be Protestant, Catholic or Orthodox, and probably decades of civil war amongst white people after all the non-whites, Muslims and Jews are expelled.
We also know some of these nationalists are pagans who will be fighting the Christians because they loathe all the Abrahamic faiths.
I have sent Joe Owens a few messages via YouTube, but I doubt that he knows how to access it because the process is not straightforward. I would be happy to have a chat with him on my YouTube channel, so please pass this message on to him if you can.
He is a tough man with a bit of a chequered history.
The great thing about Joe Owens is that he is a masculine man with convictions who knows he is being ignored but won't give up and accept it.
Mark Collett flees from debate because he knows the futility of his pretending "European traditionalism" is going to save the day when he is too afraid to even mention Christianity.
Nick Griffin says it has to be Christianity, only because of the Hungarian and Polish example, but they are both Catholic. How likely is Western Europe to embrace Catholicism? Not on you nelly.
Owens and I have independently arrived at the conclusion that Mark and Millennial Woes have no answers.
Soon, all the female alt-right YouTubers will retire to have babies, and Mark will be on his own again.
MW is making YouTube of incredible irrelevance and people are laughing. I have not been following it myself, but here is how it is being described to me:
Anon: A guy called Kraut and Tea started a war with the Alt-Right and appears to have created a secret cabal to target which may or may not have been staged I think that Kraut has trolled them all but practically everyone swallowed this "espionage" narrative They obtained the info of that greasy european guy called Coach Red Pill. And "leaked" to him that they knew his real name. He made these surreal and hypobolic oscar worthy videos talking about someone knowing his name as if it was a murder. The guy had already doxxed himself and the dark parts of the internet had already found out who he was from news reports. He is, as Sargon put it, "a legitmate fraudster" which is an oxymoron if you ask me He's one of the far right in the alt-right CK: This is not even about politics. Anon: Yeah. It's war The right against the alt right At the same time, one of the "conspirators" put on a fraudulent event. CK:
What is a fraudulent event? Anon: Organised a free speech convention called "Kilroy" Had no idea what that means by the looks of it And invited a lot of people and then fleeced their fans for tickets and then uninvited half of the people they invited. Then, they sent out contracts to everyone else making ridiculous demands and they refused to sign them. They got rid of everyone who paid for it and then brought in their own mates as speakers. These are the supposed conservative people CK: Perhaps they think they are playing cops and robbers, or cowboys and Indians. Anon: You're catching my drift CK: He really is such a silly boy. I guess you can only so far with saying "We want an ethno-state." Anon: As mentioned previously in conversations. A lot of narcissism CK: I would be embarrassed to be seen to be discussing such trivia. Anon: It's a reflection of the whole CK: The degenerate whole ... Anon: There's a lot of little boys that have not grown up out there CK: If the political establishment is bad, its opponents are even worse. Anon: They overplay it's power as an instrument to impose your will. Both radical left and right CK: They think making YouTube videos is political activism. Anon: It's not It's entertainment CK: While avoiding subjects that need to be discussed. Anon: But entertainment with repercussions in the real world CK: But entertainment with repercussions in the real world Anon: That's why it's funny Imagined power is what this is all about Validation
@NickGriffinBU Would you happen to have the contact details of Joe Owens, Nick? https://t.co/j5ktZO8wcj I thought I would invite him to have a chat on my YouTube channel. It would be good to interview you again too.
You were right about Joe Owens' response to me received today. "I’ve no intention (and nor do I need to) of discussing anything with you. Don’t send anymore emails. Your now blocked."
That's strange because in the past Owens has moaned on his videos how other activists like Millennial Woes, Mark Collett etc got interviewed but Owens was wondering why no you tuber wanted to interview him. Yet now he has an offer he turned it down. Anyway did he call you a spy?
Mark Collett points out the masochism of white people. Most women are masochistic and seem to enjoy their self-abasement. The female preference is prioritised in our stinking matriarchy because our cucked male politicians chase the female vote to get elected into office. https://t.co/mLnQYrOhDK
Interestingly, Mark Collett is of the faction that wants women in the alt-right, presumably because they have more subscribers than him because they are sexier and he has to piggyback on these female alt-right YouTubers like Tara McCarthy in order to get an audience. https://t.co/1f0VE8CX9a
Both Mark Collett and Millennial Woes want mediocre women like Tara McCarthy to be in the alt-right, probably because they are hoping to marry or mate with one of these female alt-right YouTubers but these women will retire as soon as they have babies of whatever colour. https://t.co/BEQSYFWGS2
Baby boomers being discussed by Mark Collett and Millennial Woes. Their ill-bred children will probably end up murdering them for their property. https://t.co/55362ynwcF
The reason why the government is borrowing and the banks lending so recklessly is to fund the welfare state for social parasites to feed off. Solution: abolish the welfare state. Will the alt-right discuss this properly? Will they, hell! https://t.co/KR8vNdu3g1
Millennial Woes and Mark Collett now talk about marriage, the family and Muslims, but will they admit that Christianity has failed? I doubt that they will be discussing this at all, because they are both atheists, anti-Semites and Islamophobes. https://t.co/mLnQYrOhDK
Millennial Woes and Mark Collett complain about the campaign urging white women to "put a coloured penis in your c**t" Xmas campaign by all major high street retailers, apparently. #tescochristmasadverthttps://t.co/Zefe3UmIE8
Mark Collett complains about the monarchy endorsing and popularising miscegenation. "The future of our people lies in the wombs of our women," he says. Jews know this. William Peirce mentioned. https://t.co/5C2tyzBGaQhttps://t.co/jfw5Na4cVN
Millennial Woes says virile blacks and Muslims know how to approach white women. Swedish men are now wimps in the face of a Muslim thug so Swedish women will feel safer with the Muslim thug. https://t.co/yqKx6kpEcD
Millennial Woes says white women are approached by non-white men promising to marry them while white men never offer this. Mark Collett talks about the refugee clubbers who will keep approaching women in clubs until the score while white men are easily discouraged and hurt. https://t.co/puzsprXZzs
Mark Collett complaining about Lauren Southern and women like her having dated non-white men in her past and insisting they must apologise to white men for this transgression. https://t.co/jv8fQm1JHX
Mark Collett and Millennial Woes earnestly hope Lauren Southern will nail her colours to the mast of ethno-nationalism and make a video apologising for being a "coal-burning mud shark" and a "race-mixing whore". https://t.co/jv8fQm1JHX
Mark Collett: "Great heresies will not be tolerated" even if the woman concerned is attractive and alt-right men covet her. "We need good women because we need womb space." https://t.co/MHk17hUqMi
To want to support institution of marriage but be afraid to shame sluts is wishing to wound but fearing to strike. It is a very feminine and cowardly dilemma that masculine and courageous men should be immune from, but masculine and courageous men are now extinct. @MarriageF
No principle will be defended when men are afraid of women because of the way the law operates against men. Western Man is now so petrified of his treacherous and oppressive women who now control all the arms of government that he dare not admit how afraid of them he is.
Because masculine, courageous and rational men are now extinct in the West, Western civilisation as we know it will soon become extinct. https://t.co/fANWcSjQNx
Western Man is now so morally compromised that even the white nationalists who oppose the liberal establishment cannot bring themselves to uncompromisingly defend marriage. I know this because none of them will debate with me. https://t.co/7Kp2UglX98
If Christianity has failed, has it been replaced by Feminism?
If Christianity failed and was replaced by Feminism, is Islam the only religion capable of dislodging it?
If the answer to this is no, what else is there?
Should feminism be disloged to save the West from feminazis? https://t.co/p9tbtaROOe
Millennial Woes seems to be saying that Tara McCarthy is pregnant. There is no mention of her being married, which makes her, well, not that traditional. https://t.co/WLCdOhKFut
Millennial Woes is "disappointed" that Lauren Southern had a half black boyfriend when she was 16. He says it like a headmaster. https://t.co/WLCdOhKFut
Millennial Woes says @Roosh is running out of ideas which is why he is trying to split the alt-right. MW resents Roosh for having shagged many more white women than he has and hints that white men in a better era would know what to do with a brown man like him. https://t.co/WLCdOhKFut
Millennial Woes: "For the alt-right to stand a chance of transforming society, it has to develop beyond this. We have to mature and develop beyond the male insecurity and paranoia. We have this vulnerability and massive weakness which can cause us to destroy our own movement." https://t.co/WLCdOhKFut
Millennial Woes anticipates an exodus of tweeters from Twitter to Gab where they will fight each other even more for the sake of something to do. https://t.co/WLCdOhKFut
"Start building, instead of trying to tear other people down. Be aware of your own flaws and insecurities so they cannot be used to manipulate you into harming this community. The whole world wants us to fail, There are dark times ahead and terrible things are going to happen." https://t.co/0Dksi5G0tw
"We must be able to rely on each other. Xmas is coming - a time for renewal and a time for good will. I would suggest people forgive each other and accept each other's frailties and their own and move forward together, sronger for this, not damaged, weakened or stopped by it." https://t.co/wvFQ6Mw0Ow
All about Lauren Southern. Mark Collett tell tells men not to give her any money and doubts her integrity because she sees nothing wrong in having once dated non-white men. It seems he expects any white woman who has ever had a relationship with a non-white to apologise to white men.
