Jonathan Bowden: Tolerance & Empire, Leftist Delusions, Islamification, Labour Liars, British Future

Full text: bin Laden's 'letter to America'

If Baroness Jones is on the Met's domestic extremist list, then so should I be.

Baroness Jones, who used to be a member of the disbanded police watchdog the Metropolitan Police Authority said as a Green Party politician some of her views could be seen as extreme by some.

"They are using a label of 'domestic extremist' for people who are publicly elected, have never been arrested and have no criminal background. I do think it is a waste of their time," she said.

The Association of Chief Police Officers (Acpo) defines domestic extremism as individuals or campaign groups that carry out "criminal acts of direct action in furtherance of what is typically a single-issue campaign", adding that the groups usually seek to change legislation outside of the normal democratic process.

The Met said the National Domestic Extremism and Disorder Intelligence Unit database contains about 2,500 individual records.

http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-england-london-27872451

I shall be very offended indeed if I am not on the their list, after so many years of making my views known to the political establishment.

I have been arrested and have a criminal record.

http://thevoiceofreason-ann.blogspot.co.uk/2013/01/my-arrest-at-0740-on-24-january-by-five.html

I have never ever denied being an extremist when accused of this on social media, explaining that "Extreme error requires extreme correction."

Surely it can be said that a number of the proposals at http://thevoiceofreason-ann.blogspot.co.uk/2011/08/how-to-reinvigorate-british-economy.html can be said to be in some way "extremist"?

I have even hinted darkly at mutiny and a military coup.
https://www.facebook.com/pages/Campaign-for-a-military-dictatorship/310095559126516?fref=ts Indeed, I have already identified whom I would most like to lead my proposed military coup at
http://thevoiceofreason-ann.blogspot.co.uk/2014/02/will-theresa-may-deport-colonel-richard.html

I have also recently questioned the moral validity of British values at http://thevoiceofreason-ann.blogspot.co.uk/2014/06/british-values-and-what-i-would-like.html

What more do I have to do to actually get on this list? I really don't want to advocate and commit violence and terrorism.

Who shall I write to at the Met to bring this to their attention?

How much did the taxpayer pay for the blowjob the slag gave the copper?

The woman had been to a nightclub before her boyfriend allegedly attacked her in the street.

Formby and another officer attended their home in the early hours 19 September, 2009, and he stayed at the scene when the boyfriend was arrested.

The court heard this week how the woman 'asked Formby to kiss her' before 'removing his kit-belt and performing fellatio on him'.

'This was a publicly-funded case and there can be no doubt that each side has incurred costs well in excess of any sum that any judge could possibly award for the events in question. 

http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-2590917/Woman-performed-sex-act-police-officer-wins-6-600-damages.html

How many of you men would fall for it even after reading this?

Fuckable woman invites you into her home and then goes down on you.

You would all fall for it again and again and again and again and again ....

You are getting your dick out and wanking yourself silly at the thought even now, I bet.

Men are the weaker sex when it comes to saying no to no-strings sex.  Your brain falls out and your dick takes over.

Just admit you are the weaker sex where that is concerned, and then you can fight the sluts and join me in my campaign to Save Western Civilisation from Sluts.  To be cured you must first admit you are ill and desire a cure.

Awarding the woman more than £6,000 in damages today, a judge said Formby (pictured) 'should have put judgment before desire'

Sadly, this is what most men are at heart: sex predators who cannot say no to free sex.  Sluts really have most men by the goolies.  

In Britain most women are sluts and most men are MCSFs (Morally-Compromised Slut-Fuckers).  

http://www.independent.co.uk/news/uk/politics/endemic-police-failure-to-take-domestic-violence-seriously-is-putting-womens-lives-at-risk-says-report-9217401.html suggests that more men will be the victim of false accusations of domestic violence and that more women will waste more police time with malicious accusations and use up police resources when they could be catching criminals rather than victimising men at the behest of malicious and capricious women and sluts.

This is what I suggest:

1. Anyone who complains of domestic violence will be asked if /she had done anything to upset the alleged perpetrator of DV.
2. They will be told to go before a Domestic Violence Tribunal at which sensible people like me will sit.  
3. If there are no visible signs of injury or bruising there will be no hearing and the matter will not be taken further.  
4. If there is no sign of bruising the couple will be directed to a Matrimonial Disputes Tribunal at which sensible people like me will sit if one of them wishes to take the matter further. http://thebattlefieldoflove.blogspot.co.uk/2010/06/my-interpretation-of-that-wife-beating.html 
5. These tribunals will only be available to married couples. Those living in sin will have to sort things out themselves.  

Sorted.  

The London Metropolitan Thought Police are patrolling a neighbourhood and social network near you

Metropolitan Police ‏@metpoliceuk
Hate crime hurts us all. If you've been affected by someone else's prejudice find out how we can help. #SpeakOut http://soundcloud.com/metropolitan-police/speak-out-hate-crime?utm_source=soundcloud&utm_campaign=share&utm_medium=twitter&utm_content=http://soundcloud.com/metropolitan-police/speak-out-hate-crime
 12:40 PM - 14 Nov 12

Claire Khaw ‏@1party4all
Is "hate crime" not also #thoughtcrime? Do we now have the Thought Police telling us not to hate? What may I not hate, @metpoliceuk?
 12:44 PM - 14 Nov 12

Claire Khaw ‏@1party4all
What is hate crime anyway? Are we really not allowed to hate? Or say things about people we hate? What about free speech? @metpoliceuk
12:50 PM - 14 Nov 12

Claire Khaw ‏@1party4all
Why can't we say that we hate something or someone? Why is that a crime? Or are we allowed to hate only certain people only? @metpoliceuk
12:51 PM - 14 Nov 12

Claire Khaw ‏@1party4all
Please, @metpoliceuk what are the elements of a hate crime? Is it when I hate people or when I say something that makes people hate me?
12:52 PM - 14 Nov 12

Claire Khaw ‏@1party4all
Doesn't the European Convention of Human Rights allow us to hate something and give us the right to express our hatred? @metpoliceuk
12:55 PM - 14 Nov 12

Claire Khaw ‏@1party4all
Am I allowed to hate #SSMs, @metpoliceuk?
12:59 PM - 14 Nov 12

Claire Khaw ‏@1party4all
Am I allowed to hate white people but not black people, @metpoliceuk ?
1:00 PM - 14 Nov 12

Claire Khaw ‏@1party4all
Am I allowed to hate men but not women, @metpoliceuk ? #thoughtcrime
1:00 PM - 14 Nov 12

Claire Khaw ‏@1party4all
Am I allowed to straight people but not gay people, @metpoliceuk ? #thoughtcrime #speakout
1:02 PM - 14 Nov 12

Claire Khaw ‏@1party4all
Am I allowed to hate able-bodied people but not disabled people, @metpoliceuk ? #thoughtcrime #speakout
1:03 PM - 14 Nov 12

Claire Khaw ‏@1party4all
Please @metpoliceuk, tell us what I am allowed to love and hate. #thoughtcrime #speakout
1:04 PM - 14 Nov 12

"Repeal ALL anti-discrimination legislation and end this race for Greater Victimhood!" or "Why I am thinking of voting Lib-Dem"

Gad, all these race discrimination actions brought by disgruntled Asian officers who didn't get their promotion!

One wonders if the police have time to catch any criminals, their time at work being mostly taken up by fretting about being racially discriminated against or being racially discriminatory towards one another.

Perhaps the reason why Ali Dezai didn't get his promotion despite getting top marks for all his exams was because his employers knew he would be a trouble-maker.

This was of course proven prescient in the light of his subsequent actions.

Perhaps the Met have every reason not to hire anyone who is not IC1, because of their higher statistical probability of suing for racial discrimination, which is disruptive to the workplace as well as socially-divisive.

It is very rare for anyone IC1 to sue for race discrimination. Sex discrimination, yes, but virtually all who sue employers claiming discrimination are women and wogs (if such a playful alliteration is still allowed). Is this (and the fact that they have a tendency to get pregnant even when unmarried, and use their sick children as an excuse to skive off work) not a compelling reason not to hire these groups of people?

Why, I might be hunted down and shot by the PC police just for suggesting this, but I will say it anyway.

I have no doubt that British society would be more cohesive and less litigious if all anti-discrimination legislation were repealed.

In its old Tyndalite days, the BNP were unashamed about their desire to repeal all anti-discrimination legislation. Now they seem to have pulled back from this, perhaps because they see the potential of claiming Greater Victimhood than the non-1C1s after decades of oppression suffered by them from the PC-liberal elite.

It is a great shame really, if British nationalism merely identifies itself with this modern manifestation of the slave mentality, that of Victimhood and Blaming Others - a womannish and proletarian trait.

I had once thought those who supported the BNP - however much they blamed the wrong people for their ills - had the courage of their convictions to brave being treated as social pariahs in the service of a nationalist ideal. This ideal was something to do with a peasant and instinctive antipathy towards PC liberalism and the concomitant desire to introduce more traditional policies favouring the family, as well as the condign punishment of criminals, or so I had thought.

Now, however, it does appear that all is lost. British nationalism is represented by an all-white cry for Greater Victimhood. If they have nothing more constructive to offer the electorate other than Greater Grievance, Greater Victimhood and the bribing of non-whites to go home at £50K per person, then they will fail in even these dubious objectives.

If this once-great country should be run by anyone, it should be by The Great and The Good, confident of their Greatness and Goodness.

Were it to be run by the ones who wish to represent The Least and the Worst, proud of the smallness of their minds and their tendency to vice and illegitimacy, what sort of standard would it set for the rest of the nation? Or indeed a loose federation of England, Scotland and Wales? (The BNP favour divisive devolution and an English Parliament, don't you know.)

At least the Lib-Dems (or should they now be called the Libertarian-Democrats?) are saying something populist that is also sensible. Nick Clegg should be congratulated for this bold repositioning of his party by offering us the option of lower taxes, unlike the contemptible and cowardly Conservatives.

Were he to dare go further on this Libertarian theme and propose the repeal of all anti-discrimination legislation, and take the UK out of the EU, he would have more than my vote. Let us hope he is power-hungry enough to take this risk.

For any Lib-Dems reading this, may I point out that there is nothing inherently anti-Liberal or undemocratic about repealing laws that favour litigious employees who should never have been hired.