Does voting make voters stupid?

Democracy allows the toxic ideology of feminism to thrive and take over all the organs of state. True/False #GE2015
— Claire Khaw (@ntfem) April 27, 2015

Every time you vote, the number of Slut Single Mothers and their illegitimate offspring increases. True/False #GE2015
— Claire Khaw (@ntfem) April 27, 2015

Every time you vote, the number of paedophiles increases. True/False #GE2015
— Claire Khaw (@ntfem) April 27, 2015

Voting causes feminism which causes immigration, family breakdown, illegitimacy degeneracy and paedophilia. True/False #GE2015
— Claire Khaw (@ntfem) April 27, 2015

Does 1) voting or 2) elections lower Western IQ? http://t.co/nHqei4OEQz #GE2015
— Claire Khaw (@ntfem) April 27, 2015

If government noticeably worsens after every election, should we stop 1) voting or 2) holding general elections? #GE2015
— Claire Khaw (@ntfem) April 27, 2015

If voting makes us more stupid and degenerate, we should stop voting and abolish representative democracy. Logical/Illogical #GE2015
— Claire Khaw (@ntfem) April 27, 2015

Support Dolce & Gabbana who support the traditional family

http://www.independent.co.uk/news/people/elton-john-boycotts-dolce--gabbana-after-designers-call-ivf-babies-synthetic-10109022.html

I cannot see anything I want from their online shop at http://store.dolcegabbana.com/gb

@moejoe_ I think #DolceAndGabanna should start selling hankies costing under £10 that say "IVF is dysgenic, no adoption for gay couples."
— Claire Khaw (@ntfem) March 16, 2015

@ThisHeadStuff How do you know until these IVF kids have lived and died and their achievement in life carefully measured? #DolceAndGabanna
— Claire Khaw (@ntfem) March 16, 2015

@JoshuaSDoran There are already quite enough people who can have children without expensive and complicated procedures.
— Claire Khaw (@ntfem) March 16, 2015

@JoshuaSDoran Nobody is measuring the achievements of IVF conceived people, are they? I am saying it is UNNECESSARY.
— Claire Khaw (@ntfem) March 16, 2015

@EL_Myself Because the West is already DEGENERATE. res ipsa loquitur.
— Claire Khaw (@ntfem) March 16, 2015

@cwaig_graham Eugenics preceded the Nazis, actually. The Romans themselves practised it.
— Claire Khaw (@ntfem) March 16, 2015

@cwaig_graham Francis Galton and Herbert Spencer were eugenicists; Hitler did not invent eugenics but got the idea from the English.
— Claire Khaw (@ntfem) March 16, 2015

@JoshuaSDoran It is unnatural and unnecessary. Did you win the race to your mother's ovum? You were just *dropped* in it.
— Claire Khaw (@ntfem) March 16, 2015

@ThisHeadStuff People who cannot find anyone to marry them should not have babies. Marriage is eugenic, bastardy dysgenic.
— Claire Khaw (@ntfem) March 16, 2015

@EL_Myself To be degenerate means to be inferior morally, intellectually, physically, economically and socially to your parents.
— Claire Khaw (@ntfem) March 16, 2015

@EL_Myself Allowing only the married capable of sexual reproduction with each other 2 hv children is an important process of quality control
— Claire Khaw (@ntfem) March 16, 2015

@willisthewin @EL_Myself Of course not. I am not a German national, do not speak German and the Nazi Party is no longer in existence.
— Claire Khaw (@ntfem) March 16, 2015

@cwaig_graham Please do not confuse being civilised with being PC Liberal. Plenty of civilisations that are not PC Liberal.
— Claire Khaw (@ntfem) March 16, 2015

@EL_Myself IVF means the sperm does not even win a race to its mothers ovum. It is just parachuted in.
— Claire Khaw (@ntfem) March 16, 2015

@EL_Myself Not the scientists who get paid to do IVF!
— Claire Khaw (@ntfem) March 16, 2015

@ThisHeadStuff Actually, the lunatics, morons and extremists have been in charge for decades.
— Claire Khaw (@ntfem) March 16, 2015

@EL_Myself The scientists who do IVF are paid to do IVF and know on which side their bread is buttered.
— Claire Khaw (@ntfem) March 16, 2015

@EL_Myself u r a blind person crossing the road. I m sighted person telling u that a car is coming. You say "Prove it!" CRASH BANG. The End.
— Claire Khaw (@ntfem) March 16, 2015

@RSmythFreelance @ThisHeadStuff I have already said IVF should be BANNED FOR EVERYONE INCLUDING INFERTILE MARRIED COUPLES.
— Claire Khaw (@ntfem) March 16, 2015

@EL_Myself We know IVF is possible, we are just debating whether it is dysgenic. We are already degenerate to allow it.
— Claire Khaw (@ntfem) March 16, 2015

@EL_Myself Is evidence being collated about the progress of IVF babies?
— Claire Khaw (@ntfem) March 16, 2015

@EL_Myself You have to wait from them to die before you can make a proper assessment of their characteristics and progress in life.
— Claire Khaw (@ntfem) March 16, 2015

@ronandalywrites @ThisHeadStuff This obsession with compassion is a sign of the feminisation and neurosis of men who should be using REASON.
— Claire Khaw (@ntfem) March 16, 2015

@EL_Myself I am saying that no measurable data is being collated or even recorded. The measure of a man is by his actions.
— Claire Khaw (@ntfem) March 16, 2015

@ronandalywrites @ThisHeadStuff You probably don't even know how feminised you have become to fit into the matriarchy we live in.
— Claire Khaw (@ntfem) March 16, 2015

@ronandalywrites @ThisHeadStuff The conquered take on the views of their conquerors and the West is a pornocracy ie rule by sluts.
— Claire Khaw (@ntfem) March 16, 2015

@EL_Myself The West is already degenerate for countenancing gay adoption and the degenerate do degenerate things to promote more degeneracy.
— Claire Khaw (@ntfem) March 16, 2015

@ronandalywrites @ThisHeadStuff Infertile people won't die of not having babies while people starved of food die.
— Claire Khaw (@ntfem) March 16, 2015

@KJWXXX @JoshuaSDoran You confuse the difference between a prayer and a curse. A prayer is wishing for good things, a curse for bad things.
— Claire Khaw (@ntfem) March 16, 2015

@KJWXXX @JoshuaSDoran So, because I dare to disagree with you about gay adoption, you and your nice friends curse me with infertility?
— Claire Khaw (@ntfem) March 16, 2015

@KJWXXX @JoshuaSDoran Now we know what nice people the proponents of gay adoption are. Thank you so much for showing your true colours.
— Claire Khaw (@ntfem) March 16, 2015

@KJWXXX @JoshuaSDoran I would say the proponents of IVF are more likely to have already been cursed by God with infertility and be LGBT.
— Claire Khaw (@ntfem) March 16, 2015

@jazhowe1968 @Jason_Alabama Are you really saying anyone who supports traditional marriage n the traditional family is a "fascist scumbag"?
— Claire Khaw (@ntfem) March 16, 2015

@EllexBee Children are not pets or accessories. IVF and allowing extramarital sex is dysgenc. Both should be banned.
— Claire Khaw (@ntfem) March 16, 2015

@AndyMcC73 My point is simple: if there is a society in which babies are IVF-conceived and another which are not, which would be healthier?
— Claire Khaw (@ntfem) March 16, 2015

The British matriarchy was established in 1974 when Keith Joseph's career was destroyed by sluts

@ntfem re: your continual dislike of whining by men ... why do I do it? why do many other anti-feminists do it? ... cont....
— Anthony Larme (@AnthonyLarme) March 4, 2015

@ntfem b/c PC/feminism = power via exclusive victimhood. To destroy that power, you have to destroy their exclusive victimhood narrative.
— Anthony Larme (@AnthonyLarme) March 4, 2015

@ntfem also, if you want strong, confident men to take charge and destroy feminism, how can men do this without taking care of themselves?
— Anthony Larme (@AnthonyLarme) March 4, 2015

@AnthonyLarme It is just a matter of how you frame your complaints. Saying "Pity me" is not going to enhance the complainant's masculinity.
— Claire Khaw (@ntfem) March 4, 2015

@AnthonyLarme A man who is a victim is in the same position as a rape victim in terms of marriageability. No one wants to touch soiled goods
— Claire Khaw (@ntfem) March 4, 2015

@AnthonyLarme When people see victims whom they think deserve to be victims cos of their obvious unattractiveness, they don't get support.
— Claire Khaw (@ntfem) March 4, 2015

@AnthonyLarme As I have said, the obvious sub-alpha male status of these beta male complainants instinctively arouses pity and contempt.
— Claire Khaw (@ntfem) March 4, 2015

@AnthonyLarme I have told antifeminists many a time that the first thing they must do is find a leader who has alpha qualities.
— Claire Khaw (@ntfem) March 4, 2015

@AnthonyLarme They probably won't do it because the ones I am talking to wants to be leader of the pack, like that pathetic Mike Buchanan.
— Claire Khaw (@ntfem) March 4, 2015

@AnthonyLarme Everything about Mike Buchanan is the opposite of persuasive. He alienates his audience INSTANTLY cos of his charmlessness.
— Claire Khaw (@ntfem) March 4, 2015

@AnthonyLarme If @MikeBuchanan11 insists on doing it all himself the least he can do is get some media training to project himself better.
— Claire Khaw (@ntfem) March 4, 2015

@AnthonyLarme When infantilised men think the only way to get what they want is through snivelling victimhood they are beyond help.
— Claire Khaw (@ntfem) March 4, 2015

@AnthonyLarme I have also said before that beta males will never accept the authority of another obviously beta male. @MikeBuchanan11
— Claire Khaw (@ntfem) March 4, 2015

@AnthonyLarme While I understand that beta males are really the victims of feminism, these victims should not be led by another beta male.
— Claire Khaw (@ntfem) March 4, 2015

@AnthonyLarme Being led by a beta male will immediately lower the status of your group. Isn't this OBVIOUS?
— Claire Khaw (@ntfem) March 4, 2015

@AnthonyLarme There is also a reason why no alpha male will want to involve himself in antifeminism: because he knows he will lose status.
— Claire Khaw (@ntfem) March 4, 2015

@AnthonyLarme I am the only person able to do the job willing to do the job, but masculine/racial pride prevents you from accepting my help.
— Claire Khaw (@ntfem) March 4, 2015

@AnthonyLarme I know Mike Buchanan would rather fail than accept my help because his little man pride won't allow him to do so.
— Claire Khaw (@ntfem) March 4, 2015

@AnthonyLarme If antifeminism were being led by an alpha male he would not feel threatened by me at all, but Mike Buchanan is sub-alpha.
— Claire Khaw (@ntfem) March 4, 2015

@AnthonyLarme The last line of defence of the sub alpha male is "I don't want to and you can't make me" and this Mike Buchanan is using.
— Claire Khaw (@ntfem) March 4, 2015

@AnthonyLarme What I have said illustrates why it is CRUCIAL beta males only choose their leader and that women must not be allowed to do so
— Claire Khaw (@ntfem) March 4, 2015

@AnthonyLarme I do realise that saying this means calling into question female suffrage, and I am not suggesting that it be abolished.
— Claire Khaw (@ntfem) March 4, 2015

@AnthonyLarme The best way of modifying the existence of female suffrage is to introduce the principle of no representation without taxation
— Claire Khaw (@ntfem) March 4, 2015

@AnthonyLarme Under no representation without taxation most women wd be disenfranchised after abolition of anti-discrimination legislation.
— Claire Khaw (@ntfem) March 4, 2015

@AnthonyLarme Not only should there be no representation without taxation I propose to free the low-waged from the burden of paying taxes.
— Claire Khaw (@ntfem) March 4, 2015

@AnthonyLarme Once the welfare-claiming classes have been disenfranchised, beta males can choose their leader without feminine interference.
— Claire Khaw (@ntfem) March 4, 2015

@AnthonyLarme http://t.co/iqNgNJbltc “Women usually vote for the more handsome man" and *despise* men like Mike Buchanan,.
— Claire Khaw (@ntfem) March 4, 2015

@AnthonyLarme Not only is Mike Buchanan not doing the antifeminist movement any good he is lowering the status of men associated with it.
— Claire Khaw (@ntfem) March 4, 2015

@AnthonyLarme Because antifeminists are so fragmented Mike Buchanan is probably the only fish in his tiny pond.
— Claire Khaw (@ntfem) March 4, 2015

@AnthonyLarme His little man's pride will make cling on to what little status he thinks he has. Mike Buchanan will not give in gracefully.
— Claire Khaw (@ntfem) March 4, 2015

@AnthonyLarme Mike Buchanan will not admit that he is not the best leader for antifeminism and will continue not to engage with me at all.
— Claire Khaw (@ntfem) March 4, 2015

@AnthonyLarme By not engaging with me or discussing or denouncing them Mike Buchanan thinks he is depriving me of the oxygen of publicity
— Claire Khaw (@ntfem) March 4, 2015

@AnthonyLarme The Mike Buchanan syndrome of beta male hopelessness is why the vote should not have been extended indiscriminately to women.
— Claire Khaw (@ntfem) March 4, 2015

@AnthonyLarme Do not forget that it was the female vote that put New Labour in power. Attractive men are usually incorrigibly shallow/vain.
— Claire Khaw (@ntfem) March 4, 2015

@AnthonyLarme Don't forget that that women will always vote to lower standards of sexual morality because they think it benefits them.
— Claire Khaw (@ntfem) March 4, 2015

@AnthonyLarme 83% of female MPs voted for gay marriage while only 48% of male MPs did. http://t.co/qXXP6MBANk
— Claire Khaw (@ntfem) March 4, 2015

@AnthonyLarme 78% of warmongering female MPs were Blair's Babes from Labour's all-women shortlists http://t.co/DXqFmDdb6c
— Claire Khaw (@ntfem) March 4, 2015

@AnthonyLarme Chasing the female vote increased our taxes and the size of the state while reducing our liberties http://t.co/bYwOq5QanX
— Claire Khaw (@ntfem) March 4, 2015

@AnthonyLarme It is time men dared to propose holistic and radical solutions like mine or at the very least discuss them amongst themselves.
— Claire Khaw (@ntfem) March 4, 2015

@AnthonyLarme Perhaps the reason why cowardly Mike Buchanan won't even engage with me on this is because he fears to be thought an extremist
— Claire Khaw (@ntfem) March 4, 2015

@AnthonyLarme I think it has 2b acknowledged that I have managed to make all my points without ever trying to make anyone feel sorry for me.
— Claire Khaw (@ntfem) March 4, 2015

@AnthonyLarme Young men prepared to fight this join ISIS leaving senescent n scared beta males to whinge like women weakly weekly, it seems.
— Claire Khaw (@ntfem) March 4, 2015

@AnthonyLarme Beta males applying to the matriarchy to be pitied and have their grievances acknowledged and addressed is a mug's game.
— Claire Khaw (@ntfem) March 4, 2015

@AnthonyLarme The pity of it is that these pathetic beta males do not even dare to suggest that indiscriminate universal suffrage was wrong.
— Claire Khaw (@ntfem) March 4, 2015

@AnthonyLarme Beta males presenting the matriarchy with a list of complaints will be brushed aside, but those with a solution would not be.
— Claire Khaw (@ntfem) March 4, 2015

@AnthonyLarme That there is no man in the Anglosphere able to present the case against antifeminism competently and boldly is a tragedy.
— Claire Khaw (@ntfem) March 4, 2015

@AnthonyLarme I had hoped that some ambitious politician with alpha qualities would wish to take my ideas and run with them but not at all.
— Claire Khaw (@ntfem) March 4, 2015

@AnthonyLarme In the Liberal West where free speech supposedly exists NOT A SINGLE SENIOR POLITICIAN Is prepared to discuss my ideas.
— Claire Khaw (@ntfem) March 4, 2015

@AnthonyLarme The beta males I am in touch with can't/won't do anything because they dislike my ideas or want to suppress my ideas.
— Claire Khaw (@ntfem) March 4, 2015

@AnthonyLarme A Prime Minister in waiting Keith Joseph did propose ideas resembling mine in 1974, 41 years ago and his career was destroyed.
— Claire Khaw (@ntfem) March 4, 2015

@AnthonyLarme http://t.co/9teiATrNsR has a transcript of Keith Joseph's speech when he warned "our human stock is threatened" *BY SLUTS*.
— Claire Khaw (@ntfem) March 4, 2015

@AnthonyLarme How likely are these effete/effeminate PC politicians to criticise Slut Single Mothers when it hasn't been done for 41 years?
— Claire Khaw (@ntfem) March 4, 2015

@AnthonyLarme So this the reality of the pornocracy of the West, you can be sure that the US President will not be criticising sluts either.
— Claire Khaw (@ntfem) March 4, 2015

@AnthonyLarme Think about it: the man supposed to be the most powerful man in the world - the US President - is actually LOWER THAN A SLUT.
— Claire Khaw (@ntfem) March 4, 2015

"We know who is in power by those whom we dare not criticise."

@AnthonyLarme When oppressed men cannot find male leaders to lead them and feel they can only resort to feminine stratagems the end is nigh.
— Claire Khaw (@ntfem) March 4, 2015

@AnthonyLarme It is of course the lack of a patriarchal religion that reduced Western men to a bunch of snivelling incompetents in denial.
— Claire Khaw (@ntfem) March 4, 2015

@AnthonyLarme If Christianity is kaput and stuffed with the very enemies it ought to be denouncing, the only religion left is Islam.
— Claire Khaw (@ntfem) March 4, 2015

@AnthonyLarme The difference between an alpha male and a beta male: the alpha male is not afraid to act according to logic and truth.
— Claire Khaw (@ntfem) March 4, 2015

@AnthonyLarme The difference between an alpha and a beta male: the beta male is really a coward always afraid of what people will think.
— Claire Khaw (@ntfem) March 4, 2015

@AnthonyLarme White beta males reduced to effeminate whingeing because that was probably all they saw their single mother doing.
— Claire Khaw (@ntfem) March 4, 2015

@AnthonyLarme Beta males reduced to this pathetic state probably cos they never knew their fathers who might have taught them something else
— Claire Khaw (@ntfem) March 4, 2015

@AnthonyLarme Again and again it is immoral women you should be blaming but beta males want to have sex with immoral women ie sluts.
— Claire Khaw (@ntfem) March 4, 2015

@AnthonyLarme Because men want to have sex with women even immoral women they will always instinctively defer to sluts they want to fuck.
— Claire Khaw (@ntfem) March 4, 2015

@AnthonyLarme Beta males without sound morals would be attracted to this murdering slut. http://t.co/VYYD6iDtzx
— Claire Khaw (@ntfem) March 4, 2015

@AnthonyLarme Chauvinistic dishonourable stupidly stubborn beta males will continue to insist that their pornocracy is better than Islam.
— Claire Khaw (@ntfem) March 4, 2015

@AnthonyLarme There is no doubt in my mind who will win this clash of civilisations now that Islam has declared war on the West.
— Claire Khaw (@ntfem) March 4, 2015

@ntfem Mike Buchanan seems to want to change the feminist system from within the feminist system, playing by their rules.
— Anthony Larme (@AnthonyLarme) March 5, 2015

@AnthonyLarme Then he is a supplicant and that would just lower his status which would be counter-productive when his status is already low.
— Claire Khaw (@ntfem) March 5, 2015

@ntfem the Western world's most powerful men - big Govt. & big business - are wedded to feminism, seemingly forever. Hard 2 topple.
— Anthony Larme (@AnthonyLarme) March 5, 2015

@AnthonyLarme Alpha males won't know till too late how feminism has them by the goolies. Many former alpha males are now convicted paedos.
— Claire Khaw (@ntfem) March 5, 2015

@ntfem So, do *you* wish 2 destroy the feminist victim narrative (women = victim/men = perpetrators)? If so, how? Less voting rights/quotas?
— Anthony Larme (@AnthonyLarme) March 5, 2015

@AnthonyLarme I have already proposed that there should be representation without taxation which is gender neutral.
— Claire Khaw (@ntfem) March 5, 2015

@ntfem 4 an alpha man 2 lead against feminism, he'd have 2 affirm tradit. sex morality & go against what makes most rich men rich (feminism)
— Anthony Larme (@AnthonyLarme) March 5, 2015

@AnthonyLarme Alpha males with their sex addiction, atheism and corrupted morals will not be doing anything of the sort to help beta males.
— Claire Khaw (@ntfem) March 5, 2015

@AnthonyLarme Most these so-called alpha males happily admit that they are not going to fight cos they think "This will last my lifetime."
— Claire Khaw (@ntfem) March 5, 2015

@AnthonyLarme They think "By the time the shit hits the fan I will be dead." They fear their wives will divorce them and no fault divorce.
— Claire Khaw (@ntfem) March 5, 2015

@AnthonyLarme You may continue waiting to find a white alpha male to represent you, but perhaps your only real option is to make do with me.
— Claire Khaw (@ntfem) March 5, 2015

Only 14% of female MPs voted sensibly compared to 28% of male MPs in the 3-parent baby vote

Dysgenic #mitochondrial matriarchal amendment in favour of the reproductively defective carried by libtard MPs. Ayes 382 Noes 128.
— Claire Khaw (@ntfem) February 3, 2015

It will be interesting to see the % of male and female MPs voting for the amendment to the 2008 Human Fertilisation and Embryology Act today
— Claire Khaw (@ntfem) February 3, 2015

510 MPs voted and only 182 or 33% of them voted sensibly. 

Out of the 510 MPs, 403 or 79% of them are male, and 107 or 20% of them female.

Out of the 403 male MPs, 114 or 28% of them voted sensibly.  

Out of the 107 female MPs, only 16 or 14% of them voted sensibly.

@ntfem To put a more commonplace spin on it: More Tory than Labour women in "sensible" column, despite Labour having more female MPs.
— George Pender (@George_Pender) February 4, 2015

TIME TO TELL FEMINISM TO FUCK OFF.

Three-parent embryo is actually dysgenic, but my comment was deleted from Mercatornet

What are MPs who vote for the amendment to the Human Fertilisation and Embryology Act 2008 hoping to achieve?

Alana Saarinen is a thirteen year old girl who lives with her mum and dad in Michigan, USA. She loves playing golf and the piano, listening to music and hanging out with friends. In those respects, she's like many teenagers around the world. Except she's not, because every cell in Alana's body isn't like mine and yours; Alana is one of a handful of people in the world who have DNA from three people. The BBC's Science Correspondent Rebecca Morelle explores how more children like Alana could be born. This programme examines the safety and health implications of this new science. For some it is controversial. For those who have these specific genetic diseases, it is the way they could have their own healthy child. The UK is playing a pioneering role in developing the technique, called mitochondrial replacement, and Parliament has just voted to make the process legal. But despite that, there are a small number of children in the world, like Alana Saarinen, who have DNA from three people already. Although a small sample, they could answer some of the questions people have, such as will they be healthy, do they feel like they have three parents and would they like to trace the donor one day in the future?

http://www.publications.parliament.uk/pa/cm201415/cmhansrd/cm150203/debtext/150203-0002.htm#15020348000001

NOES

Male 

1. Aldous, Peter
2. Amess, Sir David
3. Anderson, Mr David
4. Baker, Steve
5. Banks, Gordon
6. Bebb, Guto
7. Bellingham, Mr Henry
8. Berry, Jake
9. Binley, Mr Brian
10. Blackman, Bob
11. Brazier, Mr Julian
12. Burns, Conor
13. Burns, rh Mr Simon
14. Burrowes, Mr David
15. Campbell, Mr Gregory
16. Cash, Sir William
17. Chishti, Rehman
18. Chope, Mr Christopher
19. Clarke, rh Mr Tom
20. Colvile, Oliver
21. Crausby, Mr David
22. Cunningham, Sir Tony
23. Davies, Glyn
24. Davies, Philip
25. de Bois, Nick
26. Donaldson, rh Mr Jeffrey M.
27. Donohoe, Mr Brian H.
28. Drax, Richard
29. Durkan, Mark
30. Elphicke, Charlie
31. Evans, Mr Nigel
32. Evennett, Mr David
33. Field, Mark
34. Flello, Robert
35. Francois, rh Mr Mark
36. Fuller, Richard
37. Gale, Sir Roger
38. Glen, John
39. Goldsmith, Zac
40. Gray, Mr James
41. Grayling, rh Chris
42. Greatrex, Tom
43. Hanson, rh Mr David
44. Hayes, rh Mr John
45. Heald, Sir Oliver
46. Hemming, John
47. Hinds, Damian
48. Hoban, Mr Mark
49. Holloway, Mr Adam
50. Howarth, Sir Gerald
51. Jackson, Mr Stewart
52. Jones, rh Mr David
53. Jones, Mr Marcus
54. Jones, Susan Elan
55. Kane, Mike
56. Kaufman, rh Sir Gerald
57. Kawczynski, Daniel
58. Lefroy, Jeremy
59. Leigh, Sir Edward
60. Lopresti, Jack
61. MacNeil, Mr Angus Brendan
62. Marsden, Mr Gordon
63. McCann, Mr Michael
64. McCartney, Karl
65. McCrea, Dr William
66. McGovern, Jim
67. McPartland, Stephen
68. Meale, Sir Alan
69. Menzies, Mark
70. Mudie, Mr George
71. Mulholland, Greg
72. Murphy, rh Paul
73. Neill, Robert
74. Nuttall, Mr David
75. Ollerenshaw, Eric
76. Owen, Albert
77. Pawsey, Mark
78. Penning, rh Mike
79. Percy, Andrew
80. Pincher, Christopher
81. Pound, Stephen
82. Randall, rh Sir John
83. Reckless, Mark
84. Rees-Mogg, Jacob
85. Robertson, Mr Laurence
86. Rogerson, Dan
87. Roy, Mr Frank
88. Ruffley, Mr David
89. Rutley, David
90. Scott, Mr Lee
91. Selous, Andrew
92. Shannon, Jim
93. Shepherd, Sir Richard
94. Sheridan, Jim
95. Shuker, Gavin
96. Stevenson, John
97. Stewart, Iain
98. Streeter, Mr Gary
99. Stuart, Mr Graham
100. Swayne, rh Mr Desmond
101. Syms, Mr Robert
102. Tapsell, rh Sir Peter
103. Timms, rh Stephen
104. Turner, Mr Andrew
105. Vaz, rh Keith
106. Wallace, Mr Ben
107. Weir, Mr Mike
108. Wharton, James
109. Whittaker, Craig
110. Williams, Mr Mark
111. Wilson, Sammy
112. Wright, rh Jeremy
113. Mr Peter Bone
114. Mr Philip Hollobone

NOES

Female

1. Bruce, Fiona
2. Coffey, Dr Thérèse
3. Doyle, Gemma
4. Doyle-Price, Jackie
5. Gillan, rh Mrs Cheryl
6. Glass, Pat
7. Hermon, Lady
8. Hillier, Meg
9. Hoey, Kate
10. Leadsom, Andrea
11. Mahmood, Shabana
12. Main, Mrs Anne
13. McGuire, rh Dame Anne
14. McIntosh, Miss Anne
15. Ritchie, Ms Margaret
16. Teather, Sarah

AYES

Male

1. Adams, Nigel
2. Afriyie, Adam
3. Ainsworth, rh Mr Bob
4. Alexander, rh Danny
5. Alexander, rh Mr Douglas
6. Allen, Mr Graham
7. Andrew, Stuart
8. Arbuthnot, rh Mr James
9. Ashworth, Jonathan
10. Austin, Ian
11. Bailey, Mr Adrian
12. Baker, rh Norman
13. Balls, rh Ed
14. Barclay, Stephen
15. Baron, Mr John
16. Barron, rh Kevin
17. Bayley, Sir Hugh
18. Beith, rh Sir Alan
19. Benn, rh Hilary
20. Benyon, Richard
21. Beresford, Sir Paul
22. Betts, Mr Clive
23. Bingham, Andrew
24. Blenkinsop, Tom
25. Blomfield, Paul
26. Blunt, Crispin
27. Boles, Nick
28. Bottomley, Sir Peter
29. Bradshaw, rh Mr Ben
30. Brady, Mr Graham
31. Brake, rh Tom
32. Brennan, Kevin
33. Bridgen, Andrew
34. Brine, Steve
35. Brown, rh Mr Nicholas
36. Brown, Mr Russell
37. Browne, Mr Jeremy
38. Bruce, rh Sir Malcolm
39. Bryant, Chris
40. Buckland, Mr Robert
41. Burden, Richard
42. Burley, Mr Aidan
43. Burnham, rh Andy
44. Burstow, rh Paul
45. Burt, rh Alistair
46. Byles, Dan
47. Byrne, rh Mr Liam
48. Cable, rh Vince
49. Cairns, Alun
50. Cameron, rh Mr David
51. Campbell, rh Mr Alan
52. Campbell, rh Sir Menzies
53. Campbell, Mr Ronnie
54. Carmichael, rh Mr Alistair
55. Carmichael, Neil
56. Carswell, Douglas
57. Caton, Martin
58. Clappison, Mr James
59. Clark, rh Greg
60. Clarke, rh Mr Kenneth
61. Clegg, rh Mr Nick
62. Clifton-Brown, Geoffrey
63. Collins, Damian
64. Connarty, Michael
65. Corbyn, Jeremy
66. Crabb, rh Stephen
67. Crockart, Mike
68. Cunningham, Alex
69. Cunningham, Mr Jim
70. Danczuk, Simon
71. Darling, rh Mr Alistair
72. Davey, rh Mr Edward
73. David, Wayne
74. Davidson, Mr Ian
75. Davies, David T. C. (Monmouth)
76. Davies, Geraint
77. Denham, rh Mr John
78. Djanogly, Mr Jonathan
79. Dobson, rh Frank
80. Doran, Mr Frank
81. Doughty, Stephen
82. Duncan, rh Sir Alan
83. Dunne, Mr Philip
84. Efford, Clive
85. Ellis, Michael
86. Ellwood, Mr Tobias
87. Evans, Chris
88. Evans, Graham
89. Fabricant, Michael
90. Fallon, rh Michael
91. Farrelly, Paul
92. Farron, Tim
93. Fitzpatrick, Jim
94. Flynn, Paul
95. Foster, rh Mr Don
96. Freeman, George
97. Freer, Mike
98. Gapes, Mike
99. Gardiner, Barry
100. Garnier, Sir Edward
101. Garnier, Mark
102. Gauke, Mr David
103. George, Andrew
104. Gibb, Mr Nick
105. Gilbert, Stephen
106. Goodwill, Mr Robert
107. Gove, rh Michael
108. Graham, Richard
109. Green, rh Damian
110. Grieve, rh Mr Dominic
111. Griffiths, Andrew
112. Gyimah, Mr Sam
113. Hague, rh Mr William
114. Hain, rh Mr Peter
115. Halfon, Robert
116. Hames, Duncan
117. Hamilton, Mr David
118. Hamilton, Fabian
119. Hammond, Stephen
120. Hancock, Mr Mike
121. Hands, rh Greg
122. Harper, Mr Mark
123. Harris, Mr Tom
124. Hart, Simon
125. Harvey, Sir Nick
126. Haselhurst, rh Sir Alan
127. Havard, Mr Dai
128. Healey, rh John
129. Heath, Mr David
130. Heaton-Harris, Chris
131. Henderson, Gordon
132. Hendry, Charles
133. Herbert, rh Nick
134. Heyes, David
135. Hollingbery, George
136. Hood, Mr Jim
137. Horwood, Martin
138. Hosie, Stewart
139. Howarth, rh Mr George
140. Howell, John
141. Hughes, rh Simon
142. Hunt, rh Mr Jeremy
143. Hunt, Tristram
144. Hunter, Mark
145. Huppert, Dr Julian
146. Hurd, Mr Nick
147. Irranca-Davies, Huw
148. Javid, rh Sajid
149. Jenkin, Mr Bernard
150. Jenrick, Robert
151. Johnson, rh Alan
152. Johnson, Gareth
153. Johnson, Joseph
154. Jones, Andrew
155. Jones, Graham
156. Jones, Mr Kevan
157. Kirby, Simon
158. Knight, rh Sir Greg
159. Kwarteng, Kwasi
160. Lamb, rh Norman
161. Lancaster, Mark
162. Lansley, rh Mr Andrew
163. Lavery, Ian
164. Lee, Dr Phillip
165. Leech, Mr John
166. Leslie, Chris
167. Letwin, rh Mr Oliver
168. Lewis, Brandon
169. Lewis, Dr Julian
170. Lilley, rh Mr Peter
171. Lloyd, Stephen
172. Llwyd, rh Mr Elfyn
173. Loughton, Tim
174. Love, Mr Andrew
175. Lucas, Ian
176. Luff, Sir Peter
177. Mahmood, Mr Khalid
178. Mann, John
179. McCabe, Steve
180. McCartney, Jason
181. McDonnell, John
182. McFadden, rh Mr Pat
183. McKenzie, Mr Iain
184. Mearns, Ian
185. Metcalfe, Stephen
186. Miliband, rh Edward
187. Miller, Andrew
188. Mills, Nigel
189. Mitchell, Austin
190. Moore, rh Michael
191. Morrice, Graeme  (Livingston)
192. Morris, Grahame M. (Easington)
193. Morris, James
194. Mosley, Stephen
195. Mowat, David
196. Murray, Ian
197. Newmark, Mr Brooks
198. Norman, Jesse
199. Offord, Dr Matthew
200. Opperman, Guy
201. Osborne, rh Mr George
202. Ottaway, rh Sir Richard
203. Paice, rh Sir James
204. Parish, Neil
205. Paterson, rh Mr Owen
206. Perkins, Toby
207. Phillips, Stephen
208. Pickles, rh Mr Eric
209. Poulter, Dr Daniel
210. Prisk, Mr Mark
211. Raab, Mr Dominic
212. Raynsford, rh Mr Nick
213. Redwood, rh Mr John
214. Reid, Mr Alan
215. Reynolds, Jonathan
216. Rifkind, rh Sir Malcolm
217. Robathan, rh Mr Andrew
218. Robertson, Angus
219. Robertson, rh Sir Hugh
220. Robertson, John
221. Rotheram, Steve
222. Russell, Sir Bob
223. Sanders, Mr Adrian
224. Sawford, Andy
225. Shapps, rh Grant
226. Sheerman, Mr Barry
227. Shelbrooke, Alec
228. Simpson, Mr Keith
229. Skidmore, Chris
230. Skinner, Mr Dennis
231. Slaughter, Mr Andy
232. Smith, Henry
233. Smith, Julian
234. Smith, Nick
235. Smith, Sir Robert
236. Soames, rh Sir Nicholas
237. Spellar, rh Mr John
238. Spencer, Mr Mark
239. Stanley, rh Sir John
240. Stephenson, Andrew
241. Stewart, Bob
242. Stewart, Rory
243. Straw, rh Mr Jack
244. Stride, Mel
245. Stringer, Graham
246. Stunell, rh Sir Andrew
247. Sturdy, Julian
248. Sutcliffe, Mr Gerry
249. Swales, Ian
250. Swire, rh Mr Hugo
251. Tami, Mark
252. Thomas, Mr Gareth
253. Thornton, Mike
254. Thurso, rh John
255. Tomlinson, Justin
256. Tredinnick, David
257. Trickett, Jon
258. Turner, Karl
259. Twigg, Derek
260. Twigg, Stephen
261. Tyrie, Mr Andrew
262. Umunna, Mr Chuka
263. Vaizey, Mr Edward
264. Walker, Mr Charles
265. Walker, Mr Robin
266. Ward, Mr David
267. Watson, Mr Tom
268. Weatherley, Mike
269. Webb, rh Steve
270. Wheeler, Heather
271. White, Chris
272. Whitehead, Dr Alan
273. Whittingdale, Mr John
274. Wiggin, Bill
275. Willetts, rh Mr David
276. Williams, Hywel
277. Williams, Roger
278. Williams, Stephen
279. Williamson, Gavin
280. Willott, rh Jenny
281. Wilson, Phil
282. Winnick, Mr David
283. Wishart, Pete
284. Woodcock, John
285. Wright, Mr Iain
286. Wright, Simon
287. Yeo, Mr Tim
288. Young, rh Sir George
289. Zahawi, Nadhim
290. Gavin Barwell
291. John Penrose

AYES

Female

1. Abrahams, Debbie
2. Alexander, Heidi
3. Baldwin, Harriett
4. Beckett, rh Margaret
5. Begg, Dame Anne
6. Berger, Luciana
7. Blackman-Woods, Roberta
8. Blackwood, Nicola
9. Bradley, Karen
10. Brooke, rh Annette
11. Brown, Lyn
12. Buck, Ms Karen
13. Burt, Lorely
14. Chapman, Jenny
15. Clark, Katy
16. Clwyd, rh Ann
17. Coffey, Ann
18. Cooper, rh Yvette
19. Creasy, Stella
20. Crouch, Tracey
21. De Piero, Gloria
22. Dinenage, Caroline
23. Dorries, Nadine
24. Eagle, Ms Angela
25. Ellison, Jane
26. Ellman, Mrs Louise
27. Engel, Natascha
28. Gilmore, Sheila
29. Grant, Mrs Helen
30. Green, Kate
31. Greening, rh Justine
32. Greenwood, Lilian
33. Griffith, Nia
34. Harman, rh Ms Harriet
35. Harris, Rebecca
36. Hilling, Julie
37. Hodge, rh Margaret
38. Hodgson, Mrs Sharon
39. Hilling, Julie
40. Hodge, rh Margaret
41. Hodgson, Mrs Sharon
42. Jackson, Glenda
43. James, Margot
44. Jamieson, Cathy
45. Johnson, Diana
46. Jowell, rh Dame Tessa
47. Kendall, Liz
48. Latham, Pauline
49. Lee, Jessica
50. Leslie, Charlotte
51. Lewell-Buck, Mrs Emma
52. Long, Naomi
53. Lucas, Caroline
54. Lumley, Karen
55. Mactaggart, Fiona
56. Malhotra, Seema
57. McCarthy, Kerry
58. McDonagh, Siobhain
59. McInnes, Liz
60. McKechin, Ann
61. Miller, rh Maria
62. Milton, Anne
63. Moon, Mrs Madeleine
64. Mordaunt, Penny
65. Morgan, rh Nicky
66. Morris, Anne Marie
67. Munn, Meg
68. Munt, Tessa
69. Murray, Sheryll
70. Nandy, Lisa
71. Newton, Sarah
72. Nokes, Caroline
73. O'Donnell, Fiona
74. Onwurah, Chi
75. Osborne, Sandra
76. Perry, Claire
77. Phillipson, Bridget
78. Powell, Lucy
79. Reeves, Rachel
80. Riordan, Mrs Linda
81. Rudd, Amber
82. Sandys, Laura
83. Seabeck, Alison
84. Smith, Angela
85. Smith, Chloe
86. Soubry, Anna
87. Spelman, rh Mrs Caroline
88. Stuart, Ms Gisela
89. Swinson, Jo
90. Thornberry, Emily
91. Truss, rh Elizabeth
92. Villiers, rh Mrs Theresa
93. Watkinson, Dame Angela
94. Whiteford, Dr Eilidh
95. Winterton, rh Ms Rosie
96. Wollaston, Dr Sarah

Three-parent embryo is actually dysgenic, but my comment was deleted from Mercatornet

http://www.mercatornet.com/articles/view/creating_three_parent_embryos_is_eugenics

Below was the comment that was deleted:

"It is actually dysgenic to assist reproductively defective women to have babies. These women are merely guinea pigs to these doctors who want subjects on which to experiment.

The possibility of a cure is not a guarantee of a cure and experiments can go wrong.

However, it is apparently not the job of MPs to consider whether such a policy would be in the national interest or whether the possibility of genetically defective babies born this way become a further burden on the state and be seen as a misfortune for their parents enticed into going along with this experiment.

Their purpose, as they see it, is to practise gesture politics and show how much they care in order to acquire as many dysgenic female votes as they possibly can, by hook or by crook."

Alana Saarinen is a thirteen year old girl who lives with her mum and dad in Michigan, USA. She loves playing golf and the piano, listening to music and hanging out with friends. In those respects, she's like many teenagers around the world. Except she's not, because every cell in Alana's body isn't like mine and yours; Alana is one of a handful of people in the world who have DNA from three people. The BBC's Science Correspondent Rebecca Morelle explores how more children like Alana could be born. This programme examines the safety and health implications of this new science. For some it is controversial. For those who have these specific genetic diseases, it is the way they could have their own healthy child. The UK is playing a pioneering role in developing the technique, called mitochondrial replacement, and Parliament has just voted to make the process legal. But despite that, there are a small number of children in the world, like Alana Saarinen, who have DNA from three people already. Although a small sample, they could answer some of the questions people have, such as will they be healthy, do they feel like they have three parents and would they like to trace the donor one day in the future?

What are MPs who vote for the amendment to the Human Fertilisation and Embryology Act 2008 hoping to achieve?

What are MPs who vote for the amendment to the Human Fertilisation and Embryology Act 2008 hoping to achieve?

Alana Saarinen is a thirteen year old girl who lives with her mum and dad in Michigan, USA. She loves playing golf and the piano, listening to music and hanging out with friends. In those respects, she's like many teenagers around the world. Except she's not, because every cell in Alana's body isn't like mine and yours; Alana is one of a handful of people in the world who have DNA from three people. The BBC's Science Correspondent Rebecca Morelle explores how more children like Alana could be born. This programme examines the safety and health implications of this new science. For some it is controversial. For those who have these specific genetic diseases, it is the way they could have their own healthy child. The UK is playing a pioneering role in developing the technique, called mitochondrial replacement, and Parliament has just voted to make the process legal. But despite that, there are a small number of children in the world, like Alana Saarinen, who have DNA from three people already. Although a small sample, they could answer some of the questions people have, such as will they be healthy, do they feel like they have three parents and would they like to trace the donor one day in the future?

Mother tells #r4today why she 'needs' MPs to vote for three-person babies technique: http://t.co/3ouG4lwJLQ
— BBC Radio 4 Today (@BBCr4today) February 3, 2015

IVF expert fears ‘carry-over’ risk in three-parent baby technique

God created "Adam and Eve" not "Adam and Eve and Susan" #IVF
— Rees-Mogg (@JakeReesMogg) February 3, 2015

@mce_marie Taxpayer funding of women who cannot reproduce within wedlock and without medical assistance is dysgenic.
— Claire Khaw (@ntfem) February 3, 2015

@mikesey1 @BBCr4today All at the behest of women who are forever whining for more and more stuff from stupid men who keep giving it to them.
— Claire Khaw (@ntfem) February 3, 2015

@mrwarmandeasy Why don't we talk about the dysgenic demands of entitled women who cannot bear healthy offspring?
— Claire Khaw (@ntfem) February 3, 2015

@mikesey1 @BBCr4today There is bound to be something wrong with children born this way and the taxpayer is again expected to pick up the tab
— Claire Khaw (@ntfem) February 3, 2015

@_JoeWillis Whether God exists or not, these women are reproductively defective. Assisting them would only burden the taxpayer.
— Claire Khaw (@ntfem) February 3, 2015

@mrwarmandeasy I am being rational: I am saying reproductively defective women should not be given fertility assistance at state expense.
— Claire Khaw (@ntfem) February 3, 2015

@mikesey1 @BBCr4today The demented dysgenic demands of these entitled women remind me of the story of the Fisherman and His Wife.
— Claire Khaw (@ntfem) February 3, 2015

@mrwarmandeasy Assisting reproductively defective women from having defective offspring is not in the long term national interest.
— Claire Khaw (@ntfem) February 3, 2015

@_JoeWillis No, I just don't see the point in giving into every single demented dysgenic demand made by over-entitled parasitical women.
— Claire Khaw (@ntfem) February 3, 2015

Will pussywhipped male MPs give into this demented dysgenic demand by reproductively defective women? http://t.co/cZ31WHyPGz @JakeReesMogg
— Claire Khaw (@ntfem) February 3, 2015

@PanaPhobe @BBCr4today Everything about feminism is dysgenic.
— Claire Khaw (@ntfem) February 3, 2015

It will be interesting to see the % of male and female MPs voting for the amendment to the 2008 Human Fertilisation and Embryology Act today
— Claire Khaw (@ntfem) February 3, 2015

Female MPs who vote for amendment to the 2008 Human Fertilisation and Embryology Act: the Fisherman's Wife. http://t.co/eQ3PqRiR0p
— Claire Khaw (@ntfem) February 3, 2015

Male MPs who vote for amendment to the 2008 Human Fertilisation n Embryology Act: pussywhipped manginas desperate for dysgenic female votes.
— Claire Khaw (@ntfem) February 3, 2015

List to be compiled: MPs who will sell the future of their country down the river for a few miserable dysgenic parasitical female votes.
— Claire Khaw (@ntfem) February 3, 2015

How would @NIgel_Farage vote on the amendment to the 2008 Human Fertilisation and Embryology Act today if he were an MP? @UKIP
— Claire Khaw (@ntfem) February 3, 2015

@ntfem Trenchantly expressed opinion, but I agree limited medical resources better expended on life-saving procedures not pandering to whims
— Paul Rogers (@paulrogers002) February 3, 2015

#mitochondrial debate: cui bono? Not the British taxpayer.
— Claire Khaw (@ntfem) February 3, 2015

#mitochondrial debate: who benefits? Parasitical and reproductively defective women, perhaps, and scientists on their hobby horses.
— Claire Khaw (@ntfem) February 3, 2015

@eddwilson @DruDodd @mjs64 @CConcern If I had defective genes I would not want to have defective offspring. It is as simple as that.
— Claire Khaw (@ntfem) February 3, 2015

@DruDodd @mjs64 @CConcern It is yet another demented demand from women, isn't it? And weak stupid men are too afraid to say no.
— Claire Khaw (@ntfem) February 3, 2015

@mjs64 @DruDodd @CConcern If a woman is reproductively defective, she shouldn't breed.
— Claire Khaw (@ntfem) February 3, 2015

@DruDodd I don't have shit for brains and piss for guts saying yes to every bloody thing women who are reproductively deficient want.
— Claire Khaw (@ntfem) February 3, 2015

@mjs64 @DruDodd @CConcern What is so outdated about discouraging the reproductively defective from breeding genetically defective offspring?
— Claire Khaw (@ntfem) February 3, 2015

@mjs64 @DruDodd @CConcern Because it is obviously too expensive and complicated to fix and there are enough people around anyway.
— Claire Khaw (@ntfem) February 3, 2015

@mjs64 @DruDodd @CConcern Because it is obviously too expensive and complicated to fix and there are enough people around anyway.
— Claire Khaw (@ntfem) February 3, 2015

Dysgenic #mitochondrial matriarchal amendment in favour of the reproductively defective carried by libtard MPs. Ayes 382 Noes 128.
— Claire Khaw (@ntfem) February 3, 2015

@ntfem ahh, a neo-Luddite. Well, good luck with that.
— Quexlia (@Quexlia) February 3, 2015

@Quexlia I just don't agree with using science for dysgenic purposes.
— Claire Khaw (@ntfem) February 3, 2015

@ntfem erm, we already live in an entirely dysgenic society. This nudges open a door which may lead to science eventually rectifying this...
— Quexlia (@Quexlia) February 3, 2015

@Quexlia I wish to challenge the feminist and matriarchal basis of our dysgenic policies, if you don't mind.
— Claire Khaw (@ntfem) February 3, 2015

@ntfem go right ahead, I'm not stopping you. In fact as long as you have the evidence to back what you say up I'll happily agree.
— Quexlia (@Quexlia) February 3, 2015

@Quexlia You don't think assisting reproductively reproductive women to breed is dysgenic? Why do you need evidence for this?
— Claire Khaw (@ntfem) February 3, 2015

@ntfem if it removes the flaw, no I don't. I'd be more concerned about societal dysgenics. Have you seen Idiocracy? Extreme, but my point.
— Quexlia (@Quexlia) February 3, 2015

@Quexlia This procedure will create more trouble for the future. Strange how so many people refuse to see this. I have seen Idiocracy, yes.
— Claire Khaw (@ntfem) February 3, 2015

@ntfem and your evidence for this assertion?
— Quexlia (@Quexlia) February 3, 2015

@Quexlia It is *obvious* that assisting those who are reproductively defective to breed is dysgenic, isn't it?
— Claire Khaw (@ntfem) February 3, 2015

@ntfem so that would be no evidence at all then?
— Quexlia (@Quexlia) February 3, 2015

@Quexlia If you are insisting on empirical evidence, then no one has it. I am reasoning *deductively*, in case you hadn't noticed.
— Claire Khaw (@ntfem) February 3, 2015

@ntfem no, you're actually projecting the same fears which people held at the time Mary Shelley wrote Frankenstein. I find that saddening.
— Quexlia (@Quexlia) February 3, 2015

@Quexlia Clearly, your world view is through rose tinted glasses.
— Claire Khaw (@ntfem) February 3, 2015

@ntfem if only that were true, but thanks for the laugh.
— Quexlia (@Quexlia) February 3, 2015

@Quexlia I am sorry you cannot understand how deductive reasoning works.
— Claire Khaw (@ntfem) February 3, 2015

@ntfem No you're not. You know full well that statement is false and if you don't you've learnt no sense of the person whom you're debating.
— Quexlia (@Quexlia) February 3, 2015

@Quexlia Why would you expect me to have a "sense" of you, whatever that means?
— Claire Khaw (@ntfem) February 3, 2015

@ntfem that I do not understand the concept of deductive reason. Look, the debate is done and you seem now intent only on irrational attack
— Quexlia (@Quexlia) February 3, 2015

@ntfem and that's fine but it's not my bag, so feel free to have the last word, and I bid you good evening.
— Quexlia (@Quexlia) February 3, 2015

@Quexlia What have I said that is irrational?
— Claire Khaw (@ntfem) February 3, 2015

Dysgenic #mitochondrial matriarchal amendment in favour of the reproductively defective carried by libtard MPs. Ayes 382 Noes 128.
— Claire Khaw (@ntfem) February 3, 2015

@ntfem you do realise the procedure is the exact opposite of 'dysgenic' don't you? You've used that word nonstop but dont know what it means
— Dru Dodd (@DruDodd) February 4, 2015

@DruDodd Any procedure or policy that causes the quality of the next generation to deteriorate would be dysgenic.
— Claire Khaw (@ntfem) February 4, 2015

@DruDodd Any procedure or policy that causes the quality of the next generation to deteriorate would be dysgenic.
— Claire Khaw (@ntfem) February 4, 2015

@ntfem so how is eradicating a genetic condition from a population dysgenic exactly? You're out of your depth.
— Dru Dodd (@DruDodd) February 4, 2015

@DruDodd The point is that this procedure only gives the *theoretical* possibility of eradicating this condition, not a guarantee of that.
— Claire Khaw (@ntfem) February 4, 2015

@DruDodd If you were being reasonable you would have to acknowledge that having a theoretical possibility of X is not a guarantee of it.
— Claire Khaw (@ntfem) February 4, 2015

@DruDodd Because it is only a theoretical possibility, it means that all mothers who present themselves for this experiment are GUINEA PIGS.
— Claire Khaw (@ntfem) February 4, 2015

@ntfem you've already abhorrently put on record your utter disdain for these mothers so why do you even care?
— Dru Dodd (@DruDodd) February 4, 2015

@DruDodd This procedure undoubtedly creates the possibility that more mitochondrially-diseased babies will be born compounding the problem.
— Claire Khaw (@ntfem) February 4, 2015

@ntfem that is a complete fallacy. If the surrogate egg contains no mutated mtDNA then there is no chance of that happening.
— Dru Dodd (@DruDodd) February 4, 2015

@DruDodd I care that MPs should not be voting for laws that do not serve the long term national interest.
— Claire Khaw (@ntfem) February 4, 2015

@ntfem I'd say ridding genetic diseases and helping the population is a long term interest. You have no kids clearly so stop worrying.
— Dru Dodd (@DruDodd) February 4, 2015

@DruDodd Haven't you noticed that there are already enough people around who can have healthy babies without complex medical procedures?
— Claire Khaw (@ntfem) February 4, 2015

@DruDodd There is no need to cure everyone of every ill, let natural selection take its course.
— Claire Khaw (@ntfem) February 4, 2015

@DruDodd You may be aware that the NHS is already being faced with a funding crisis, but perhaps you are not, or have not connected the two.
— Claire Khaw (@ntfem) February 4, 2015

@DruDodd You are Red, and Reds are not very good at joining the dots and making connections between cause and effect or avoiding mistakes.
— Claire Khaw (@ntfem) February 4, 2015

@davidaslindsay @DomHuntman This is all about chasing the dysgenic female vote. It is disgusting and degrading.
— Claire Khaw (@ntfem) February 4, 2015

@ntfem @davidaslindsay @DomHuntman But men have families too.
— . (@Chris1ll) February 4, 2015

@Chris1ll @davidaslindsay @DomHuntman Why would a rational man want anything to do with a mitochondrially-diseased offspring or wife?
— Claire Khaw (@ntfem) February 4, 2015

@ntfem @Chris1ll @davidaslindsay @DomHuntman ah the internet. I wonder if you could look me in the eye and tell me I'm diseased & stupid.
— Anna Ostrowska-Wilk (@wilkostroska) February 4, 2015

@wilkostroska @Chris1ll @davidaslindsay @DomHuntman If you were in the same room I would say allowing such a procedure would do no good.
— Claire Khaw (@ntfem) February 4, 2015

@wilkostroska @Chris1ll @davidaslindsay @DomHuntman Allowing this procedure will just create more defective members of the next generation.
— Claire Khaw (@ntfem) February 4, 2015

How to solve the problem of disability care

http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-30195857

@sima_kotecha @BBCr4today @StephenBubb It is time to prevent them from being born in the first place, surely.
— Claire Khaw (@ntfem) November 26, 2014

@ntfem @sima_kotecha @BBCr4today @StephenBubb hate crime being committed here. Why are you happy for UKIP to vilify the disabled?
— made in Grimethorpe (@kazjohnson) November 26, 2014

@kazjohnson @sima_kotecha @BBCr4today @StephenBubb It is a problem, and I am suggesting a solution. Are you trying to censor debate? @cpsuk
— Claire Khaw (@ntfem) November 26, 2014

@kazjohnson @sima_kotecha @BBCr4today @StephenBubb Who is "happy for UKIP to vilify the disabled"?
— Claire Khaw (@ntfem) November 26, 2014

@kazjohnson If the welfare state were abolished then the mothers of disabled offspring would dispose of them themselves.
— Claire Khaw (@ntfem) November 26, 2014

@ntfem I agree. I am one of those mothers
— made in Grimethorpe (@kazjohnson) November 26, 2014

@kazjohnson Thank you for admitting this. So the solution is obvious. The welfare state is obviously dysgenic and shd be abolished pronto.
— Claire Khaw (@ntfem) November 26, 2014

@kazjohnson May I congratulate you on this unexpected admission. I am reminded of http://t.co/XOPOscBEKu
— Claire Khaw (@ntfem) November 26, 2014

@kazjohnson The more women are honest with the mistakes they have made the sooner this country can solve its urgent and chronic problems.
— Claire Khaw (@ntfem) November 26, 2014

@kazjohnson Did you not just admit that you would have disposed of your disabled offspring too, like the woman in http://t.co/XOPOscBEKu?
— Claire Khaw (@ntfem) November 26, 2014

Terrorists 'use Down's syndrome suicide bombers' to kill 70 in Iraq
It seems terrorists have found a use for the learning disabled. Their audacity and ruthlessness is to be wondered at.

Al Qaeda use two Down's syndrome women to blow up 99 people in Baghdad markets

Handicapped boy who was made into a bomb

People with a learning disability are growing by up to 5% a year can require care and support costing a typical £1,500 a week

In what year will Britain be 100% learning disabled?