Translate

Showing posts with label female suffrage. Show all posts
Showing posts with label female suffrage. Show all posts

Friday, 21 December 2018

Why the West is losing its marbles and what is to be done about this



The matriarchy knows it cannot win arguments on the basis of truth, logic and morality alone. I do hope you will be discussing the effects of men denying that they live in a matriarchy.

You live in a matriarchy if the number of illegitimate births are approaching or are over half the number of legitimate births. You know this is the case in the West.

Western men fear to challenge feminism because they already know that their womenfolk are overwhelmingly feminist.

You are a feminist if even if you are a man complaining about feminism and feminists unless you also condemn fornication.

No man will publicly condemn fornication because there are too many vested interests eg men who wish to have sex with women they are not married to, men who are already having sex with women they are not married to, men who have fornicating daughters, men who used to fornicate, men who have gay sons, men whose associates have already been condoning extramarital sex and underage sex for decades.

Last, but not least, is big pharma who manufacture the contraceptive pill and of course those with shares invested in big pharma.

This is pretty much everyone really in the West and also in Russia.

Feminism is a disease of the mind and I would only be too happy to explain why it is destroying Western civilisation if given the opportunity.

We know that it is overwhelmingly women who vote for the left. Ann Coulter herself said so.

http://www.anncoulter.com/columns/2012-07-18.html

The average Western voter is a 40 year old single mother whom all political parties pander to. This explains why no one cares about foreign policy. You must understand that the national character in democracies can be easily determined by working out the average age of the nation and deciding which sex wields more power.

A patriarchy is a society that prioritises the preferences of married fathers, a matriarchy a society that prioritises the preferences of the unmarried mother, usually with variously fathered illegitimate offspring whom she badly parents.

https://yaleglobal.yale.edu/content/out-wedlock-births-rise-worldwide


Why the West is sucking in foreign workers from around the world because the class supposed to constitute its own labour force is degenerate, incompetent, uncompetitive and unwilling to work because it can claim welfare. 

The Welfare State is another Sacred Cow that must be slain.

We live in an Idiocracy because we live in a matriarchy. The matriarchy is not only dangerous to the patriarchy, it will also destroy itself after it has destroyed the patriarchy.

If we condone widespread bastardy, we are basically saying it is OK for the next generation to be parented by an immoral and irresponsible stupid woman who is in fact a sex offender and should be treated as such.
https://www.yahoo.com/news/blogs/sideshow/researchers-western-iqs-dropped-14-points-over-last-180634194.html

The only political ideology that can now shame these shameless women that their men are now too afraid to criticise of is the one with a holy book that has the verse at https://quran.com/24/2

 If you are in a burning building but are too afraid of your sacred cows that you know are blocking the exits and the windows, you will die in it, unless you remove those obstructions.

You know you must remove those obstructions or at least talk about removing those obstructions, man to man.Once you agree that this must be done, simply convey the message to the US President by promising him your support in the slaying of these sacred cows.

That would be the quickest non-violent way of restoring the patriarchy.

There are too many entitled middle class female undergraduates in universities. Male undergraduates who seek sexual access to these females will commit violence to gain access to these women by flattering them and committing violence to impress these women.

Intersectional Feminism which Lionel alluded to is not mentioned specifically, but has been identified by Alan M. Dershowitz as threatening to the Jew.
https://www.washingtonexaminer.com/alan-dershowitz-intersectionality-is-a-code-word-for-anti-semitism

There is only one religion that guarantees freedom of belief by implicitly declaring thoughtcrime legislation as unIslamic.

https://quran.com/2/256

The Church has been entirely subverted by feminists and liberals.

Tuesday, 12 April 2016

Why are men's concerns routinely marginalised and dismissed by influential men in the West?






11th minute: Why Wyoming granted female suffrage in 1869

It had 6000 males, and only 1000 females.

Men bribed women with votes to come live in Wyoming.

That was the snowball that started it all.

The rape of the Sabine women comes to mind.


Thursday, 3 September 2015

Male politicians even more vulnerable to emotional manipulation than their voters




Women who are single and looking tend to make indiscriminate displays of compassion because they think men prefer women who are stupid and kind.

They don't really mean it, but they feel they have to do this because they know men would be put off by rational and ruthless women with a will of iron, like me, perhaps.

Imagine if you were trying to manipulate a powerful lunatic, imbecile or a capricious woman of low intelligence and morals. You would have to find out their preferences and pander to them. Indeed, you would have to change your behaviour and mirror their behaviour and thinking in order to appease and manipulate them.

However, the danger of this is that you end up becoming like the capricious irrational and immoral slut, lunatic or imbecile you are trying to manipulate.

What will happen to your society if the rest of the world knows that no one is in charge and that the nation's perceived alpha male is even more vulnerable to emotional manipulation than his voters?

Even Nigel Farage has softened his message against migrants as a result of the publication of that photo of that drowned boy.

What do you think happens to dementia sufferers, stupid sluts and imbeciles?

They would be exploited, cheated, used and abused.

This is what is happening to the West now, because no Western nation has an alpha male leading them because you cannot be an alpha male if you are afraid to criticise the worst of your women - SSMs, who are lower than prostitutes.

If there is no official alpha male who dares to criticise SSMs (Slut Single Mothers with illegitimate offspring) who are lower than prostitutes, then we live in a matriarchy, and all matriarchies without exception are primitive or declining societies. (SSMs are lower than prostitutes because prostitutes at least have the virtue of making men pay for sex and giving them a price up front, unlike sluts who pretend it is free but load it with all kinds of hidden charges for the man they are transacting with and society in general. Men must always be made to pay for sex because free slut sex corrupts their characters and turns them into men afraid of sluts in just the way a drug addict would be afraid of his drug dealer no longer selling him the drug to which he is addicted. Marriage for men is always the riskiest and most expensive form of sex, even in the days of the patriarchy.)

British politicians stopped criticising SSMs in 1974 when Keith Joseph's career was destroyed in 1974 after his Edgbaston speech for talking about them destroying "our human stock". http://www.theguardian.com/politics/wintour-and-watt/2010/nov/25/conservatives-davidcameron Male MPs have not criticised SSMs for 41 years and they are not suddenly going to start now since they are even more castrated now than they were in 1974.

Even Peter Hitchens, Britain's foremost Conservative thinker, won't criticise sluts because his late mother was an adulterous suicide.  http://thevoiceofreason-ann.blogspot.co.uk/2014/03/peter-hitchens-wont-condemn-low-sexual.html If the sins of the fathers are visited on their sons, then so does the weight of a mother's adultery cripple her son's ability to denounce her sin and those of others like her.

Tom Harris the former MP for Labour, didn't get away with it either. http://www.theguardian.com/commentisfree/2009/mar/05/welfare-children

This is why male politicians are stupider and more vulnerable to emotional manipulation than their voters whom they presume to lead. These so called leaders are still pandering to the lowest, stupidest and most hypocritical of women still looking to trick a man into a relationship with them by pretending to be stupid and kind.

The trouble with democracy in an environment of indiscriminate universal suffrage is that the preferences of the beta male have been entirely marginalised. All political parties chase the female vote precisely because it is capricious but crucial to being elected and staying in office.

(Why are beta males important? They are important because they do most of the work and are the ones whose lives are sacrificed if there is a war. Beta males are still important even if sluts don't fancy them and will cheat on them at the first opportunity because those of them who think "A few minutes of alpha is better than a lifetime of beta" would still be maintained by the welfare state paid for out of the taxes of the beta male for making this "lifestyle choice". If beta males are demoralised and marginalised then very little work will be done and even defensive wars cannot be won. It is of course the beta male who objects to immigration.)  

So this is the basis on which our much-vaunted democracy rests - the preferences and unstated agenda of stupid, immoral and irresponsible sluts with the vote whom male politicians dare not criticise because they know they cannot be reasoned with. We live in a declining and morally degenerate matriarchy all right.


My review of Simon Sheppard's Sex and Power: http://www.amazon.co.uk/Sex-Power-Manual-Male-Female-Relations/dp/190124024X/ref=sr_1_1?ie=UTF8&qid=1377715983&sr=8-1&keywords=simon+sheppard+sex+and+power


BBC sends only pro-migrant female journalists to report on migrant swarms

Thursday, 6 November 2014

My advice to Japan with its shrinking populace: sack ALL women from jobs men can do

http://voiceofrussia.com/news/2014_05_04/Birth-rate-in-Japan-reaches-new-low-8786/

This would mean abandoning indiscriminate universal suffrage, though.

But there is another way.

No representation without taxation

This would mean abandoning democracy as we know it and substituting it with a one-party state with a narrowed franchise of taxpayers only with a constitution that protects the rights of its members to criticise any party policy that they do not think is in the long term national interest.

This sounds radical but I really can see no moral harm in disenfranchising the parasitical unproductive sluts and bastards who would otherwise only vote for the high-spending libtard parties who will tax the productive married and legitimate simply to buy the votes of unproductive parasitical slut and bastard voters.

I envisage a constitution that enshrines the right of a citizen not to be taxed more than 20% of his income http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Khums in which usury will be abolished and government debt be defaulted on. In short, I advocate a flat rate income tax of 20% and am sure if Islamic State offered all the citizens of the West this, they would all hurry to open the gates of their cities to ISIS.

Balanced against this right not to be taxed over a certain percentage, the citizen will have the right to expect the government to run the economy in such a way as to allow a working and married man to support his family with only his one wage.

http://thevoiceofreason-ann.blogspot.co.uk/2009/09/advantages-of-single-party-state.html

I have no problem acknowledging this system will have the virtues of being


  1. socially conservative
  2. rational
  3. libertarian
  4. anti-feminist
  5. meritocratic
  6. efficient
  7. transparent
  8. unifying
and I commend it to all the governments of the world. 

Monday, 12 May 2014

Was the President of the Oxford Union accused of rape and attempted rape only after he discussed inviting Ann Coulter to a debate?

Did Ben Sullivan the President of the Oxford Union air the idea of inviting Ann Coulter to an Oxford Union debate about feminism and female suffrage, which reached the ears of whoever put those women up to accuse him of rape and alleged rape?

It is in theory possible ...

http://thevoiceofreason-ann.blogspot.co.uk/2014/05/oxford-union-president-accused-of-rape.html
"The fundamental defect of the female character is a lack of a sense of justice. This originates first and foremost in their want of rationality and capacity for reflexion but it is strengthened by the fact that, as the weaker sex, they are driven to rely not on force but on cunning: hence their instinctive subtlety and their ineradicable tendency to tell lies: for, as nature has equipped the lion with claws and teeth, the elephant with tusks, the wild boar with fangs, the bull with horns and the cuttlefish with ink, so it has equipped woman with the power of dissimulation as her means of attack and defence, and has transformed into this gift all the strength it has bestowed on man in the form of physical strength and the power of reasoning. Dissimulation is thus inborn in her and consequently to be found in the stupid woman almost as often as in the clever one. To make use of it at every opportunity is as natural to her as it is for an animal to employ its means of defence whenever it is attacked, and when she does so she feels that to some extent she is only exercising her rights. A completely truthful woman who does not practice dissimulation is perhaps an impossibility, which is why women see through the dissimulation of others so easily it is inadvisable to attempt it with them. – But this fundamental defect which I have said they possess, together with all that is associated with it, gives rise to falsity, unfaithfulness, treachery, ingratitude, etc. Women are guilty of perjury far more often than men. It is questionable whether they ought to be allowed to take an oath at all."
-Arthur Schopenhauer, On Women

Arthur Schopenhauer - a dead white male feminists love to hate

http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-2624046/President-Oxford-Union-steps-leader-historic-debating-society-arrest-rape-allegations.html

Saturday, 10 May 2014

If women are not morally responsible for anything, should they even have the vote?


http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/uknews/law-and-order/10418682/Rape-victims-should-have-moral-responsibility.html

If as feminists claim that rape victims have no moral responsibility then it means women have no moral responsibility. If women have no moral responsibility then this means they are not responsible for anything they do, like children or lunatics, in which case the franchise should be withdrawn from them.

DEMOCRATS' IDEAL VOTER: ILLEGAL ALIEN, SINGLE MOTHER, CONVICTED FELON
http://www.anncoulter.com/columns/2012-07-18.html

http://genprogress.org/voices/2012/03/09/17660/ann-coulter-im-ok-with-revoking-womens-young-americans-right-to-vote/

[Ann Coulter] said that women were one group she believed should have their right to vote taken away. When pressed by O’Donnell, Coulter stood by her comments, arguing that every election since 1950, aside from the 1964 Barry Goldwater election, would have been won by Republicans had it not been for the woman vote. Using her typical logic, Coulter said this presents enough reason to disenfranchise women.

O’Donnell pushed further, asking Coulter how she would feel personally if she couldn’t vote. She responded: “If my entire gender loses it too, then I’m OK with it.”

http://thebattlefieldoflove.blogspot.co.uk/2010/10/case-for-disenfranchsing-women-or-why.html
How chasing the female vote increased our taxes and the size of the state while reducing our liberties

"We wonder if it is the case that you can trace inflation in the West back to universal suffrage. Politicians promise what they think voters will want and women voters, being society's main carers, are most likely to be promised the things that most expand the state.  Historically, it has mattered more - or been perceived by politicians to  matter more - to women that they get help looking after the young, the sick and disabled, than it is has to the men who don't do so much of this work.

So what do you do to get the female vote?  You promise more schools and hospitals.  Then you  promise universal tertiary education, tax credits for everyone, free bus passes for the over-60s and subsidised nursery care.  And  the more unaffordable the state promises, the more likely it is to have to print money to pay for it - and the more likely inflation becomes.

So there is more a horrible possibility that, while it doesn't make it their fault (it remains the fault of over-promising, power-hungry politicians.

Tuesday, 7 January 2014

Why won't UKIP say they will repeal the Equality Act 2010?

http://www.ukip.org/contact

Repealing the Equality Act 2010 would to demolish one of the twin pillars of feminism. The BNP has always said it would do so. Why not UKIP? They are supposed to be libertarians. Aren't libertarians supposed to hate thought-crime? What is thought-crime but law that forbids you from exercising your ability to discriminate or hate?

Will YOU be writing to UKIP asking them if they have plans to repeal to Equality Act?

UKIP Head Office


Contact Form

Send an email. All fields with an * are required.


http://thebattlefieldoflove.blogspot.co.uk/2010/10/case-for-disenfranchsing-women-or-why.html
How female suffrage has resulted in an overweening and unaffordable welfare state

http://thebattlefieldoflove.blogspot.co.uk/2012/07/too-many-women-have-vote-and-solution.html
Too many women have the vote and the solution is obvious: no representation without taxation.

http://blogs.telegraph.co.uk/finance/ianmcowie/100010127/a-tax-based-alternative-to-the-alternative-vote/
A tax-based alternative to the Alternative Vote

Monday, 30 July 2012

Too many women have the vote, and the solution is OBVIOUS

http://www.ncpa.org/sub/dpd/index.php?Article_ID=6021

The Reds are not under your bed, they are ON your bed.



64:14;
"O you who believe! surely from among your wives and your children there is an enemy to you; therefore beware of them; and if you pardon and forbear and forgive, then surely Allah is Forgiving, Merciful."

Monday, 21 May 2012

To return to rationally small government destroy feminism and reinstate family values


Feminism will never let men wean themselves off the welfare state.

Feminism wants to breast-feed the man she has infantilised, masturbate him and change his soild nappies until Western civilisation dies and rots.

How can feminism be defeated? Through the reintroduction of family values which would enable a rationally small state to exist.

How can family values be reintroduced?

Through IDEOLOGY and RELIGION.

Which religion is strong enough to defeat feminism?  Not Christianity, which is the religion of slaves and women.  In any case the Church of England is now hopelessly emasculated, infiltrated by women, gay priests, leftist clergy, liberals and third rate minds incapable of discussing morality intelligibly, who do not see it as their role to safeguard the morals of the British nation, and who in any case only associate morality with relativism and tolerance of evil and the celebration of sexual liberation, especially female promiscuity.

http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-2146793/Cannes2012-Paradise-Love-European-women-sex-tourists-African-gigolos-Palme-dOr.html

It is they who tolerate all that is evil and shower their compassion on the criminal, the hopeless cases and the undeserving at the expense of the normal and healthy.  

There remains only one religion left.  Yes, the cure to feminism would appear to worse than the disease.  But is it really?  Can anything else be worse than the degradation and dementia that always accompanies feminism, the ideology that tolerates Slut Single Mums and makes men in the political establishment afraid of them, because so many of them now have the vote?


Mark Parker entertains doubts

26:00  Psyop is just another word for state propaganda. 35:39 @DigitalGnosis ​​I dont believe Homer was a person Homer was a pagan. There wi...