Translate

Showing posts with label intersectionality. Show all posts
Showing posts with label intersectionality. Show all posts

Monday, 29 June 2020

Lord Hall on how the BBC will change culture on the "womanist" and "intersectional" of the message of Black Lives Matter

https://www.bbc.co.uk/sounds/play/m000kgnm from 2:49:00

"small radical group to an international movement"
Andrew Young, 88, BLM royalty

2:50:00 

Not sure who the leaders are. "It is a spiritual emotional movement."
"Extremely deliberate"
"womanist"
Inception in 2013
Those driving it have been women eg Professor Molina Abdullah.
Intersectional
LGBTQ+
Leaders "Group centred leadership. We want people to step into the leadership rather than being a leader-centred group."


"Culture change" is mentioned. So, our culture will change without so much as a discussion even by our feeble politicians, into what exactly we do not know.

However, "womanist" and "intersectional" are big clues.

Matthew 20:16:

"So the last shall be first, and the first last: for many be called, but few chosen."

Society will be turned upside down: the stable pyramid of the patriarchy will be replaced by the inverted pyramid of the matriarchy spinning on its apex, and will collapse like a top when it has exhausted its energy, crushing whoever wherever in its path when it falls.

Why is no opposition even being organised? Because both the religion and political system of the West have failed. Our unprincipled politicians cannot bring themselves to act because they do not know which way to jump, for they only do the right thing if they are sure it benefits them. If they were principled, they would have done the right thing already. Is it time for the West to acknowledge that its religion and political system have failed?

Friday, 21 December 2018

Why the West is losing its marbles and what is to be done about this



The matriarchy knows it cannot win arguments on the basis of truth, logic and morality alone. I do hope you will be discussing the effects of men denying that they live in a matriarchy.

You live in a matriarchy if the number of illegitimate births are approaching or are over half the number of legitimate births. You know this is the case in the West.

Western men fear to challenge feminism because they already know that their womenfolk are overwhelmingly feminist.

You are a feminist if even if you are a man complaining about feminism and feminists unless you also condemn fornication.

No man will publicly condemn fornication because there are too many vested interests eg men who wish to have sex with women they are not married to, men who are already having sex with women they are not married to, men who have fornicating daughters, men who used to fornicate, men who have gay sons, men whose associates have already been condoning extramarital sex and underage sex for decades.

Last, but not least, is big pharma who manufacture the contraceptive pill and of course those with shares invested in big pharma.

This is pretty much everyone really in the West and also in Russia.

Feminism is a disease of the mind and I would only be too happy to explain why it is destroying Western civilisation if given the opportunity.

We know that it is overwhelmingly women who vote for the left. Ann Coulter herself said so.

http://www.anncoulter.com/columns/2012-07-18.html

The average Western voter is a 40 year old single mother whom all political parties pander to. This explains why no one cares about foreign policy. You must understand that the national character in democracies can be easily determined by working out the average age of the nation and deciding which sex wields more power.

A patriarchy is a society that prioritises the preferences of married fathers, a matriarchy a society that prioritises the preferences of the unmarried mother, usually with variously fathered illegitimate offspring whom she badly parents.

https://yaleglobal.yale.edu/content/out-wedlock-births-rise-worldwide


Why the West is sucking in foreign workers from around the world because the class supposed to constitute its own labour force is degenerate, incompetent, uncompetitive and unwilling to work because it can claim welfare. 

The Welfare State is another Sacred Cow that must be slain.

We live in an Idiocracy because we live in a matriarchy. The matriarchy is not only dangerous to the patriarchy, it will also destroy itself after it has destroyed the patriarchy.

If we condone widespread bastardy, we are basically saying it is OK for the next generation to be parented by an immoral and irresponsible stupid woman who is in fact a sex offender and should be treated as such.
https://www.yahoo.com/news/blogs/sideshow/researchers-western-iqs-dropped-14-points-over-last-180634194.html

The only political ideology that can now shame these shameless women that their men are now too afraid to criticise of is the one with a holy book that has the verse at https://quran.com/24/2

 If you are in a burning building but are too afraid of your sacred cows that you know are blocking the exits and the windows, you will die in it, unless you remove those obstructions.

You know you must remove those obstructions or at least talk about removing those obstructions, man to man.Once you agree that this must be done, simply convey the message to the US President by promising him your support in the slaying of these sacred cows.

That would be the quickest non-violent way of restoring the patriarchy.

There are too many entitled middle class female undergraduates in universities. Male undergraduates who seek sexual access to these females will commit violence to gain access to these women by flattering them and committing violence to impress these women.

Intersectional Feminism which Lionel alluded to is not mentioned specifically, but has been identified by Alan M. Dershowitz as threatening to the Jew.
https://www.washingtonexaminer.com/alan-dershowitz-intersectionality-is-a-code-word-for-anti-semitism

There is only one religion that guarantees freedom of belief by implicitly declaring thoughtcrime legislation as unIslamic.

https://quran.com/2/256

The Church has been entirely subverted by feminists and liberals.

Tuesday, 10 April 2018

The totalitarian matriarchy of the West is systematically cultivating failure with intersectional feminism and a feminist foreign policy




https://www.washingtonexaminer.com/alan-dershowitz-intersectionality-is-a-code-word-for-anti-semitism

centreforfeministforeignpolicy.org/the-cffp-team
Why feminism is against the national interest

http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-3376846/Five-years-jail-men-emotionally-bully-wives-New-law-target-bullies-control-partners-coercive-controlling-behaviour.html#ixzz44WS6SqIU


ON OUR CONFLICTING LOYALTIES AND HOW TO RESOLVE THEM TO SORT THE WHEAT OF HUMANITY FROM ITS CHAFF

We all have conflicting loyalties, to our country, religion, race, sex, friends, family etc.

The most basic one is between men and women, but that is wrong too, because there should be a moral factor involved in this ideological battle.

The starkest way to frame this culture war is between men and women who are interested in the proper parenting of their legitimate offspring, and those who are not.

It would be in the national interest to privilege married parents over unmarried parents to encourage good parenting.

My view is that anyone in favour of patriarchy should be supported whatever their sex, race or religion.

So even if you are an antisemitic and Islamophobic white nationalist you should consider supporting the replacement of Christianity with another religion capable of maintaining morality if you really interested in saving your race and nation.

If you are an Islamophobic Jew, you should consider promoting Secular Koranism if only to raise the moral standards of the Western country you and your ancestors have lived for generations so that it does not become a failed state.

I say Islam because there is no other religion or ideology strong enough to kill feminism dead.

Anti-feminist Karaite Jew encourages mosque attendance

Karaite Jew recommends Islam for atheists to better fight feminism

Jew prescribing Islam for gentiles satirises white nationalists

If Islam is Judaism Lite, then Secular Koranism is Islam Lite.

Secular Koranism is not a belief system, but a legal system.

You can be an atheist, agnostic, Jew, Christian, Hindu, Buddhist as well as a Muslim as long as you acknowledge that marriage must be supported by the law and sluts and slut-fuckers shamed.

There will however be no bedroom police so in practice you will get away with it if you are not a parent of illegitimate offspring. However, if you do, the tariff is 100 lashes per bastard.

quran.com/24/2 would send a very clear message out to women not to be sluts to stop them pumping out bastards who will become the criminals and Idiocracy of the next generation.

Once this law is in place, our male politicians will stop pandering to female voters. 

Indiscriminate universal suffrage undermines marriage and patriarchy

The average voter in the West is a female voter, and the average female voter expresses herself in these terms egged on by men who pander to them



Only then would the pro-patriarchy people become powerful enough to win. Those who cannot even bring themselves to say sluts should be shamed and extramarital sex discouraged should not be considered marriageable until unless they formally renounce these views. 

Such people should be marginalised because they are not interested in the parenting of the next generation. People who cannot even bring themselves to pay lip service to marriage are by definition unmarriageable.

Jewish wisdom on what is happening to the shrinking and senescent West

Rabbi David Bar-Hayim discusses the childless leaders of Europe and asks what this phenomenon means for the future of the West.

http://www.heraldsun.com.au/blogs/andrew-bolt/dying-europes-leaders-have-no-children/news-story/9e0106b5ea1a6d05e39a57caf883db5d

THE PROBLEM WITH GENDER RELATIONS

The problem: men prefer their women to be kind and stupid. Women trying to attract male partners feel they have to pretend to be kind and stupid. Men factor this in when choosing a female partner and this is fine as long as women wield no political power, but when they do, kind and stupid women being generous to groups that threaten men's interests (eg sluts, socialists, illegal immigrants) at the expense of men of their own race and nationality would be disastrous to these men's interests.


THE PROBLEM OF INFANTILISED MEN AND WOMEN AND WHAT TO DO WITH THEM

The truth is often called ugly. People who cannot cope with the truth should be treated as children and the vote withdrawn from them.

Saturday, 24 March 2018

Rastafarian denounces Muslim activists in Speakers Corner for hypocrisy and the idolatry of worshipping a gay white man called Paul


Rastafarian:


A gay Muslim is an oxymoron. It's like saying you are a paedophile Muslim or a racist Muslim. [Or a Jewish Nazi or a Nazi who loves Jews, presumably.]
You can't classify yourself as a gay Muslim.
A [Muslim] hypocrite is worse than a kafir. 
You know how Shaitan is going to come to Muslims? He is not going to come saying 'Muslims this and Muslims that' and put their backs up. He's going to come in the form of a nice little white guy calling himself a gay Muslim. That's how Shaitan is going to infiltrate Islam. Allah says it is an abomination! 
I don't worship no white man called Paul! [The Rastafarian is suggesting that these Muslims whom he alleges to be hypocrites are making an idol of Paul - and thereby practising idolatry - because he is white and gay. Being nice to him allows them to make them seem moderate and tolerant. It is most unlikely that these Muslim activists would be quite so tolerant with gay men of their own race.]
I am African and a Rastaman. [He is proudly proclaiming that Africans and Rastafarians abhor sodomites and makes the usual point about the anus being a sewer and certainly not where a moral man should insert his sex organ.]


When the allegedly hypocritical Muslim points out that Paul is not a practising sodomite, Rastaman says "Then he shouldn't call himself gay." Presumably he means that Paul should have the decency to stay in the closet rather than let it all hang out and make Muslims think it is OK to be Muslim and gay.

The Rastafarian makes the point that these brown Muslims are guilty of idolatry and therefore of worshipping Paul rather than Allah and allowing their worship of a gay white Muslim convert to triumph over their Islamic principles because they perceive Paul as a valuable token of Muslim tolerance and moderation.




Rastafarian complains that while Paul has said he is not a practising sodomite, he has not absolutely promised that he will never have sex with another man. 

Rastafarian says he is more Muslim than the Muslims who pretend sodomy is OK to display their Western tolerance and inclusiveness and accuses them of assimilating.

Rastaman says most of the Hadith comes from the Torah.

These Muslims have allowed Paul, the West and LGBT rights to triumph over Allah.



Thursday, 12 October 2017

Alan Dershowitz denounces Hard Left Intersectionality and discusses Israel and US foreign policy


http://www.washingtonexaminer.com/alan-dershowitz-intersectionality-is-a-code-word-for-anti-semitism/article/2618871

Alan Dershowitz denounces intersectionality.

He does not appear to have made the connection between feminism and intersectionality.

Intersectionality is of course the measurement and acquisition of victimhood as a means of showing status.

I am afraid Dershowitz is a Liberal Jew who has allowed himself his Liberalism to trump his Judaism.

He says he is a Democrat, and "I buy the entire liberal agenda up and down and I am a Zionist."

I am a feminist and I am a Zionist, I am a gay rights activist and I am a Zionist, and I will never give up the Democratic Party. 

Friday, 8 September 2017

In our matriarchy, the Jew is lower in status to the fornicating slut, because even the privileged Jew dares not criticise her


Facts and reason won't work on the degenerate, only fear and shame. Shame would only work on those capable of feeling shame, and the degenerate are not capable of feeling shame. Enslaved by their appetites and governed only by their emotions, the degenerate are of course easy to bribe and threaten.

What we see in the West is the wholesale abandonment of Truth, Reason and Morality as guiding principles and the total abasement of men before the pedestal on which the promiscuous woman commands him to do her bidding.

Strangely and sadly, the oppressed Western Man refuses to blame the morals of Western Woman and has convinced himself that it is the fault of a Jewish conspiracy and a Muslim invasion.

In a matriarchy, all men are lower than the fornicating slut.

In a matriarchy, no senior politician will criticise the morals of the fornicating slut.

If he does, there will be consequences.

If you don't believe me, ask yourself what happened to these Jewish men in senior positions of influence when they criticised the morals of fornicating sluts.

What happened to Keith Joseph, Prime Minister in-waiting after his Edgbaston speech in 1974? He was no longer Prime Minister in-waiting.

https://www.theguardian.com/politics/wintour-and-watt/2010/nov/25/conservatives-davidcameron

What happened to Maurice Glasman of Blue Labour when he said immigration should be stopped in 2011? Helen Goodman sorted him out good and proper, didn't she?

http://www.newstatesman.com/blogs/dan-hodges/2011/07/blue-labour-maurice-glasman

Even the Jewess Melanie Phillips frets about the degeneracy and dementia of the gentile, wanting Western Man to run his country properly, bewailing as I do the fact that he is now appears beyond reason.

http://thevoiceofreason-ann.blogspot.co.uk/2017/08/melanie-phillips-wests-auto-immune.html

Does Rabbi Sacks who helped set up the Marriage Foundation with Sir Paul Coleridge even mention the morals of the unmarried mother who casually conceives and casually abandons her variously fathered illegitimate offspring?



No, of course not. Even the privileged Jew is below the immoral woman in our degenerate matriarchy.

The penny has dropped for Alan Dershowitz on the nature and purpose of feminist intersectionality.

http://www.washingtonexaminer.com/alan-dershowitz-intersectionality-is-a-code-word-for-anti-semitism/article/2618871

http://thevoiceofreason-ann.blogspot.co.uk/2017/03/jews-are-also-victims-of-matriarchy.html

Feminism causes anti-Semitism (as well as degeneracy, dementia, immigration and paedophilia)

What is the attitude of the alt-right to the fornicating slut? Are they more afraid of her than they are of being exploited by Jews, invaded by Muslims, becoming the crime victims of blacks and other assorted non-white undesirables? One cannot escape the conclusion that they must be very afraid of her indeed, since she is their only source of apparently free sex if they cannot afford a wife, and most of them cannot afford a wife. Even they could afford one, they would become terrified of her right to divorce them under the rules of no fault divorce giving her the right to confiscate half their property and deprive them of their children.

What a shame then that these alt-right YouTubers are not up to discussing how the economy and society could be rejigged to make marriage a good bargain for men again.

To do this would upset the feminists and the fornicating sluts, and this would never do!

Saturday, 29 July 2017

Jeffrey Marshall in conversation with Claire Khaw



Topics discussed:

  • Charlie Gard
  • Melanie Phillips
  • Scottish Widows
  • Professor Michio Hirano
  • funerals
  • brain damage
  • Crowdfunding
  • media
  • David Cameron
  • intersectionality
  • Gordon Brown
  • Millennial Woes
  • depression
  • victimhood
  • traditional values
  • alpha male
  • deep state
  • democracy 
  • conspiracy theories
  • Jews
  • scapegoat

Thursday, 20 April 2017

Questions I was asked about feminism

Q.  Why are you not a feminist?

A.   Because I am not immoral, evil, selfish, stupid and irrational. Feminism encourages women to be promiscuous women and such women should be discouraged for the good of your civilisation and the long term national interest. All feminists assume the right of women to have premarital sex and these promiscuous women are the soldiers of feminism who corrupt the morals of men by bribing them with fornication. The conquest is now successful and complete. You won't find a single senior white Western male politician prepared to uncompromisingly support marriage. Not even won't senior politicians discuss this, no senor academic will discuss this either, and certainly no senior nationalist.

These pathetic white nationalist men who complain about being exploited by Jews and invaded by Muslims are actually too afraid to marry women of their own race because they know the rules of no fault divorce would financially eviscerate them the moment their wife is bored or irritated, or has a political disagreement with their husbands.

Q.  What do you think about patriarchy?

A.  All advanced civilisations are patriarchies, all declining and primitive societies are matriarchies. Why would someone who lives in an advanced civilisation want to live in a primitive society or be degenerate? Only the degenerate. I don't want to be degenerate.

They could be talking about the abolition of no fault divorce or why marriage is eugenic and bastard dysgenic, but they prefer to blame Jews and Muslims who piss on them from on high that they are too venal and sex-addicted to give up because they already know they are unmarriageable and are too atomised to co-operate with each other to organise a revolution or an effective political movement.

Having just seen how Trump has utterly betrayed them, they have had the stuffing knocked out of them, yet again.

They also know they are all beta males and no beta male will accept the authority of another beta male.

These arrogant fuckers just won't accept that they need a religion with patriarchal moral values that supports the institution marriage and think they can get what they want (ie a pogrom against Jews and Muslims and immigrants) without this.

Most of them just hope to die before Western civilisation as they know it collapses anyway.

http://corpus.quran.com/translation.jsp?chapter=13&verse=11

God will not change the lot of a people until they change what is in their hearts, says this verse.

What are in the hearts of these degenerate atheist fucktards?

They want to remain MCSFs till the day they die. So sad, when many of them are obviously no longer even sexually active. http://thebattlefieldoflove.blogspot.co.uk/2013/06/all-spossms-are-mcsfs-but-not-all-mcsfs.html

So, while they remain in denial in the hope of fucking promiscuous women, or wanting to avoid offending them because these promiscuous women are their daughters, sisters, grandmothers etc, things will continuing going from bad to worse till Western civilisation as we know it collapses.

Q.  What do you think about intersectionality?

A.  Intersectionality is about the acquisition of victimhood as a means of achieving status in a degenerate and declining society. It is a feminine stratagem and useful only for this purpose when your society is already a stinking degenerate matriarchy on its way to hell in a handcart and accelerating fast.

Q. What do you think about rape culture?

A.  As I understand it, the term "rape culture" is about not asking obvious questions of the complainant as to how she came to be raped, as she alleged. Was she drunk? Was she silent and thus indicating consent as her alleged rapist had intercourse with her? Did she by her behaviour indicate that her alleged rapist had reasonable grounds for thinking she was consenting? What was she wearing? If she objected to having sex, why didn't she struggle? The defence is no longer allowed to ask these questions.

Q.  What do you think about objectification?

A.  You mean women as sex objects? Men want to have sex with women, and women want men to give them stuff in return. This is the way of the world.

Q.  What do you think about cat calling?

It is how lower class men indicate their appreciation of a woman's attractiveness when they are in groups.

Q.  What do you think about slut shaming/sex positivity?
A.  Obviously, fornicatresses who are promiscuous women must be shamed to discourage women from being and becoming fornicating promiscuous women and adulteresses. That is the only way to eradicate feminism. Emasculated men enfeebled by half a century of being breast fed premarital sex won't get it together to comprehensively denounce this or uncompromisingly support marriage. It would be like expecting the most degraded drug addict to call the cops on his dealer. That is why a big new idea is necessary to galvanise these degenerate enfeebled emasculated beta male victims of feminism. It is probably too late for them now anyway, but for the sake of good order I will continue to keep pointing this out.

Q.  What do you think about lgbt issues?

A.  LGBT sex is a category of extramarital sex that the Koran forbids.

https://quran.com/4/15

https://quran.com/4/16

Q.  What do you think about minority rights issues?

A.  I think we should be focusing on what form the *dominant culture* should now take. That is the real question. I am interested in being part of the dominant culture and being one of the people who had a hand in the formation of the new dominant culture.

Q.  What do you think about gender discrimination?

A.  We should expect it since everyone exercises it.

Q..  What do you think about misogyny/misandry?

A.  Men and women who have had bad experiences and relationships with the opposite sex will feel bitter and angry. This is less likely to occur in a patriarchy than in the stinking degenerate matriarchy that we have now.

Q.  What do you think about anti feminism/MRAs/MGTOW?

A.  MGTOW is part of the matriarchy.

The only way to solve the problem of feminism is to re-establish the patriarchy.

The only way to re-establish the patriarchy is to see to it that most members of society practise marriage and respect its rules ie no extramarital sex (and this includes premarital and gay sex).

MGTOW not marrying would just exacerbate the degeneracy of criminal bastards who will soon become the majority, making society even more criminal and chaotic.

MRAs who still don't understand this are being willfully blind because they don't want to grasp the nettle of denouncing promiscuous fornicatresses because they want to have sex with women without marrying with them or paying for a prostitute.

Q. What do you think about men's issues?

A. Beta male victims of feminism clearly have many issues with feminism and I have already proposed that it be eradicated with Secular Koranism, because I can't quite see any other system of rules with sufficient moral authority being strong enough to do the job.

http://thevoiceofreason-ann.blogspot.co.uk/2014/05/secular-koranism.html

Wednesday, 3 September 2014

Why do so many men insist on calling Feminism "Cultural Marxism"?

Because they are afraid of offending women, who are overwhelmingly feminists.

Feminism was the thin end of the wedge, and the thin end of the wedge began with the Equal Pay Act 1970.

Which group do you think would object most vociferously and is the largest and most electorally powerful group? Feminists, of course, ie the female vote. Most women these days are feminists, and feminists refuse to contemplate the repeal of the Equality Act 2010.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Equality_Act_2010

The primary purpose of the Act is to codify the complicated and numerous array of Acts and Regulations, which formed the basis of anti-discrimination law in Great Britain. This was, primarily, the Equal Pay Act 1970, the Sex Discrimination Act 1975, the Race Relations Act 1976, the Disability Discrimination Act 1995 and three major statutory instruments protecting discrimination in employment on grounds of religion or belief, sexual orientation and age. It requires equal treatment in access to employment as well as private and public services, regardless of the protected characteristics of age, disability, gender reassignment, marriage and civil partnership, race, religion or belief, sex, and sexual orientation.

Women use their victimhood to make men feel guilty, and intersectionality is the measurement and acquisition of VICTIMHOOD.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Intersectionality#Intersectionality_theory_and_feminist_thought

The disabled black lesbian is the best demonstration of the use of this concept, whose purpose is to PRIVILEGE members of these minorities at the expense of the heterosexual white male of mature years, traditionally identified as sexist, homophobic, antisemitic, builders of an empire, incorrigibly racist and therefore evil and fully deserving of their punishment that will be inflicted on them during the paedo witch-hunts that even now rages against men who used to have some status in society, eg paedophile priests and entertainers.

But it all started with feminism. Feminism served as the foot in the door of the salesmen that sold you all these unwanted and pernicious ideas that everyone has now absorbed, like mother's milk, since the 1970s.

What are the consequences of offending women, who are overwhelmingly feminists, who are overwhelmingly sluts? (Sluts are women who will have sex with men not their husbands.)

These men will get no sex from sluts and feminists. The only other option is to take a wife (who has the right to divorce her husband for no particular reason under no-fault divorce and then take half his stuff and deprive him of his children) or hire a prostitute.

Is it any surprise that most men in Britain are gutless wimps who only live for the next cheap to free sexual encounter with a slut before the police come knocking on their door to examine their computer for kiddyporn?

I trust I have demonstrated the helplessness of the politically incorrect and hopelessly marginalised white male of mature years. Once you are old enough to look ugly, you will look like the very model of a modern British paedophile.

Why do you think Will Self was questioned by the police who had him down as a potential paedophile when he was with his son hiking? Because he is as ugly as sin.

Will Self 

The matriarchy has no respect for the old, certainly not for old ugly men.

http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-2396222/Branded-paedophile-hiking-son-WILL-SELF-reveals-nightmare.html

The revolution devour its children. 

Tuesday, 30 April 2013

Please help me save a life and a sex organ

http://www.livescience.com/11208-high-suicide-risk-prejudice-plague-transgender-people.html
A staggering 41 percent of transgender people in the United States have attempted to commit suicide.  

Should we be trying to stop @B1uEYE from mutilating his genitalia and then feeling suicidal about that?

Please join ask.fm to help save his life.

He is not trained for any occupation and wants to do gender studies after his transition.  He is not going to get a job, is he, in the hard times ahead?

He will end up working in porn and becoming a prostitute.

I have already told him why men despise men who are born men yet give that up because they are not up to facing life as a man, which is harder than the life of a woman, only to become a prostitute.

They become prostitutes because they won't get a decent job and the usual jobs for women in cleaning and childcare will be closed to them.

Also, men who want a female prostitute and find themselves with a man disguised as a female prostitute get very angry indeed and tend to commit violent assault.

Please help me save his sex organ and his life.  

He can be found at http://ask.fm/B1uEYE and https://twitter.com/B1uEYE

http://www.guardian.co.uk/society/2004/jul/30/health.mentalhealth
Sex changes are not effective, say researchers

Even The Guardian says it doesn't work!

And even Julie Bindel, who writes for the Guardian, says don't do it.  She says they won't be taken seriously if they get raped and won't even have access to public toilets.

Not being able to use a public toilet when you are dying for poo or a wee would make anyone suicidal, I would have thought.

http://www.guardian.co.uk/world/2004/jan/31/gender.weekend7

Bindel was trying to do them a favour by warning them against this, but got slagged off for being transphobic for her trouble instead.

Being transphobic seems to mean "incurring the hatred of transsexuals" rather than really hating transgender people, which is crazy and unfair.  I don't think hating anyone should be a crime, as long as you don't do anything to them that is against the law.  Julie Bindel means well, I am sure, and even if she and I don't see eye to eye with each other on feminism, I can see that she meant well really.

Feminism is nothing to do with giving men equal rights anyway.  It is all about getting women more rights at the expense of men and society.  Feminists consider transsexuals as "other" in just the same way that they consider men as other and the enemy, and certainly lower than men.

Please help me stop him from - I am sorry to be crude about this - cutting his dick off, depriving himself of offspring, and becoming a prostitute or porn actor with a degree in gender studies.  I know I would feel suicidal in his place if I ended up like that.

I really don't think this sort of thing should be available on the NHS at all.

I hope no one is going to accuse me of hating transgender people.  What I feel is concern and compassion for men who feel they doing this to themselves would make them feel happier, when statistics almost conclusively show that quite the opposite is the case.  It is actually wicked not to discourage them, in my opinion.

http://b1ueye.blogspot.co.uk/

It is a great shame that he has disabled his ask.fm account.  I managed to reveal a lot about his motivations through my forensic questioning, and that is now all lost.

The important facts I remember are that he dropped out of school and hopes to do a degree in gender studies post-op.   He is so paranoid that he accused Cath Eliot http://www.guardian.co.uk/profile/cathelliott of plotting against him because she invited some people to her home one evening.

He unfriends his friends who associate with people whose views he dislikes.

Not good mental health, I would say.

Anyway, read his blog.  It is all an exercise in obtaining victim status through this new feminist concept called intersectionality, in my opinion.

Intersectionality is about the measurement and comparison of victim status as well as the acquisition of it, as those who have done Gender Studies will know.  I have no idea why the government funds these courses at taxpayers' expense.

Below are tweets by people who hate me, wish me harm and want to censor me while claiming I hate transgender people.  I don't hate them.  I already know they lead terrible lives and have mental health issues, and that is why it is so wicked to encourage them to think a sex change will make them feel better about themselves.  They probably want to have lots of sex but know they can't have lots of sex as men, only as women. Well, that's my theory and I'm sticking to it, because it is true that a woman can get lots of sex as long as she is prepared to lower her standards, as Dr Kanazawa will confirm.

... every woman has the power to predict the future, while very few men do.  If a man wakes up in the morning and says to himself, “Tonight I will get laid,” the prediction will fail a vast majority of the times, unless he’s incredibly handsome.  (Most young men in fact do make this prediction every morning and go to bed alone and disappointed every night.)  If a woman -- any woman -- wakes up in the morning and says to herself, “Tonight I will get laid,” the prediction will always come true every time.  Such is the power of female choice.

http://www.psychologytoday.com/blog/the-scientific-fundamentalist/200807/men-do-everything-they-do-in-order-get-laid-iii




John Kemp:

"If a man is tired of his penis, he is tired of life."

Mark Parker entertains doubts

26:00  Psyop is just another word for state propaganda. 35:39 @DigitalGnosis ​​I dont believe Homer was a person Homer was a pagan. There wi...