Questions I was asked about feminism

Q.  Why are you not a feminist?

A.   Because I am not immoral, evil, selfish, stupid and irrational. Feminism encourages women to be promiscuous women and such women should be discouraged for the good of your civilisation and the long term national interest. All feminists assume the right of women to have premarital sex and these promiscuous women are the soldiers of feminism who corrupt the morals of men by bribing them with fornication. The conquest is now successful and complete. You won't find a single senior white Western male politician prepared to uncompromisingly support marriage. Not even won't senior politicians discuss this, no senor academic will discuss this either, and certainly no senior nationalist.

These pathetic white nationalist men who complain about being exploited by Jews and invaded by Muslims are actually too afraid to marry women of their own race because they know the rules of no fault divorce would financially eviscerate them the moment their wife is bored or irritated, or has a political disagreement with their husbands.

Q.  What do you think about patriarchy?

A.  All advanced civilisations are patriarchies, all declining and primitive societies are matriarchies. Why would someone who lives in an advanced civilisation want to live in a primitive society or be degenerate? Only the degenerate. I don't want to be degenerate.

They could be talking about the abolition of no fault divorce or why marriage is eugenic and bastard dysgenic, but they prefer to blame Jews and Muslims who piss on them from on high that they are too venal and sex-addicted to give up because they already know they are unmarriageable and are too atomised to co-operate with each other to organise a revolution or an effective political movement.

Having just seen how Trump has utterly betrayed them, they have had the stuffing knocked out of them, yet again.

They also know they are all beta males and no beta male will accept the authority of another beta male.

These arrogant fuckers just won't accept that they need a religion with patriarchal moral values that supports the institution marriage and think they can get what they want (ie a pogrom against Jews and Muslims and immigrants) without this.

Most of them just hope to die before Western civilisation as they know it collapses anyway.

http://corpus.quran.com/translation.jsp?chapter=13&verse=11

God will not change the lot of a people until they change what is in their hearts, says this verse.

What are in the hearts of these degenerate atheist fucktards?

They want to remain MCSFs till the day they die. So sad, when many of them are obviously no longer even sexually active. http://thebattlefieldoflove.blogspot.co.uk/2013/06/all-spossms-are-mcsfs-but-not-all-mcsfs.html

So, while they remain in denial in the hope of fucking promiscuous women, or wanting to avoid offending them because these promiscuous women are their daughters, sisters, grandmothers etc, things will continuing going from bad to worse till Western civilisation as we know it collapses.

Q.  What do you think about intersectionality?

A.  Intersectionality is about the acquisition of victimhood as a means of achieving status in a degenerate and declining society. It is a feminine stratagem and useful only for this purpose when your society is already a stinking degenerate matriarchy on its way to hell in a handcart and accelerating fast.

Q. What do you think about rape culture?

A.  As I understand it, the term "rape culture" is about not asking obvious questions of the complainant as to how she came to be raped, as she alleged. Was she drunk? Was she silent and thus indicating consent as her alleged rapist had intercourse with her? Did she by her behaviour indicate that her alleged rapist had reasonable grounds for thinking she was consenting? What was she wearing? If she objected to having sex, why didn't she struggle? The defence is no longer allowed to ask these questions.

Q.  What do you think about objectification?

A.  You mean women as sex objects? Men want to have sex with women, and women want men to give them stuff in return. This is the way of the world.

Q.  What do you think about cat calling?

It is how lower class men indicate their appreciation of a woman's attractiveness when they are in groups.

Q.  What do you think about slut shaming/sex positivity?
A.  Obviously, fornicatresses who are promiscuous women must be shamed to discourage women from being and becoming fornicating promiscuous women and adulteresses. That is the only way to eradicate feminism. Emasculated men enfeebled by half a century of being breast fed premarital sex won't get it together to comprehensively denounce this or uncompromisingly support marriage. It would be like expecting the most degraded drug addict to call the cops on his dealer. That is why a big new idea is necessary to galvanise these degenerate enfeebled emasculated beta male victims of feminism. It is probably too late for them now anyway, but for the sake of good order I will continue to keep pointing this out.

Q.  What do you think about lgbt issues?

A.  LGBT sex is a category of extramarital sex that the Koran forbids.

https://quran.com/4/15

https://quran.com/4/16

Q.  What do you think about minority rights issues?

A.  I think we should be focusing on what form the *dominant culture* should now take. That is the real question. I am interested in being part of the dominant culture and being one of the people who had a hand in the formation of the new dominant culture.

Q.  What do you think about gender discrimination?

A.  We should expect it since everyone exercises it.

Q..  What do you think about misogyny/misandry?

A.  Men and women who have had bad experiences and relationships with the opposite sex will feel bitter and angry. This is less likely to occur in a patriarchy than in the stinking degenerate matriarchy that we have now.

Q.  What do you think about anti feminism/MRAs/MGTOW?

A.  MGTOW is part of the matriarchy.

The only way to solve the problem of feminism is to re-establish the patriarchy.

The only way to re-establish the patriarchy is to see to it that most members of society practise marriage and respect its rules ie no extramarital sex (and this includes premarital and gay sex).

MGTOW not marrying would just exacerbate the degeneracy of criminal bastards who will soon become the majority, making society even more criminal and chaotic.

MRAs who still don't understand this are being willfully blind because they don't want to grasp the nettle of denouncing promiscuous fornicatresses because they want to have sex with women without marrying with them or paying for a prostitute.

Q. What do you think about men's issues?

A. Beta male victims of feminism clearly have many issues with feminism and I have already proposed that it be eradicated with Secular Koranism, because I can't quite see any other system of rules with sufficient moral authority being strong enough to do the job.

http://thevoiceofreason-ann.blogspot.co.uk/2014/05/secular-koranism.html

The British Thought Police widens its definition of thoughtcrime

Mere vulgar abuse is an insult that is not necessarily defamatory because it is not intended to be taken literally or believed, or likely to cause real damage to a reputation. Vituperative statements made in anger, such as calling someone "an arse" during a drunken argument, would likely be considered mere vulgar abuse and not defamatory.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Defamation

What is not even a civil wrong has now become a crime in matriarchal Britain.

In the days of the patriarchy, there was free speech, but no longer in our demented matriarchy.

The Bhagavad Gita:

"Out of the corruption of women proceeds the corruption of races; out of the corruption of races, the loss of memory; out of the loss of memory, the loss of understanding, and out of this all evil."

"Out of the corruption of SLUTS proceeds the corruption of races; out of the corruption of races, the loss of memory; out of the loss of memory, the loss of understanding, and out of this all evil."

"Out of the corruption of TOLERATING SLUTS AND BASTARDS proceeds the corruption of races; out of the corruption of races, the loss of memory; out of the loss of memory, the loss of understanding, and out of this all evil."

It is possible to be a woman without being a slut, whore or feminist

The study monitored the use of the words “slut” and “whore” by UK Twitter users over three weeks from the end of April. It found that 6,500 individuals were targeted by 10,000 aggressive and misogynistic tweets in that period.

Internationally, more than 200,000 aggressive tweets using the same words were sent to 80,000 people in the same period – and according to the study, more than half of the offenders were women.

https://www.theguardian.com/technology/2016/may/25/yvette-cooper-leads-cross-party-campaign-against-online-abuse?CMP=twt_gu

1. Not every woman is a whore, so to call a woman a whore if she is one is not necessarily misogynistic.
2. Not every woman is a slut, so to call a woman a slut if she is one is not necessarily misogynistic. 
3. Surely feminists are able to accept that it is possible to be a woman without being either a whore or a slut?
4. All feminists without exception support the right of women to have premarital sex, ie to fornicate ie be sluts. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Mortal_sin  http://quran.com/24/2
5. The definition of slut should be tightened up. An interesting discussion of how many sex partners a woman has to fornicate with before being called a slut can be found at https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=n0XVgioi29I from 1:21. A matter to be decided by philosopher, perhaps. The woman in question confessed to having 50 to 60 sex partners and suggested that a slut should be a woman who has had sex with upwards of 100 men.  
6. Is it the intention of feminazis to outlaw expressions of social conservatism? 
7. Is it the intention of feminazis to outlaw slut-shaming? https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Slut-shaming
8. Is it the intention of feminazis to desecrate the institution of marriage which can only be supported by shaming sluts? 
9. Is it the intention of feminazis to abolish traditional marriage, because it is the foundation of all patriarchies?
10. If more than half of the offenders who tweeted aggressively used "whore" and "slut" were women, then why can't men use those words too? 
11. Are feminazis suggesting that only women can use the words "slut" and "whore", but not men? 
12. Would it be an idea to have a men's, women's and unisex section of Twitter so everyone can just say what they want within the rules of their respective groups? 
13.  It is surely only misogynistic to say, for example, "I hate women," but why are the feminazis presuming to tell us whom we may or may not hate? That would be THOUGHTCRIME.
14. Are feminazis trying to define misogyny as "anyone women - who are mostly sluts and whores - hate"? 
15. The corruption of language is the corruption of thought, and the corruption of thought leads to error, evil, disaster and doom.

Yvonne Ridley leads hysterical and incoherent attack on Ed Husain

http://www.middleeastmonitor.com/blogs/politics/12335-laddish-ed-husain-wears-veil-of-misogyny

https://twitter.com/yvonneridley/status/481441756723306497

Apparently saying anything that makes a feminist hate you is "misogyny", even if you give them well-meant advice about what not to wear if you think there is an Islamophobic murderer lurking around.

What Not To Wear must be deeply misogynistic then.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/What_Not_to_Wear_(UK_TV_series)

And then all this crap about men not being allowed to offer their opinion on what women should wear. Why the hell are men always being asked by fat women "Does my bum look big in this?" and then crucified for giving the "wrong" answer?

Do women who fret about what to wear not dress for men?

Can you imagine how many people Yvonne Ridley would send to the Tower if she were the Queen of Hearts, on a bad day?

There is SECRET Facebook group administered by a UKIP man who wants to sterilise women who want abortions

It is called Exchanging Ideas.   You can join this secret group if you request friendship from Stuart Hamilton, the backstabbing piece of shit who used to jointly administer the group with me.

We agreed that, since I had broken the rules of secrecy, I should be seen to be punished.  I agreed that my punishment would be a week's exile.

However, he soon put up polls about whether I should remain admin and then whether I should return at all.

Of course, if the boot had been on the other foot, I would have kept to my word about letting him return after a week, and left it at that.   However, these days, in slut and bastard Britain where even educated men have no grasp of the principles of fair dealing and keeping one's word, his behaviour was only to have been expected.

And so he has banned me permanently and made Mark Barnes, the UKIP man who wants to sterilise women who want abortions and to make non-white citizens of Europe second class citizens, the group admin.

http://thevoiceofreason-ann.blogspot.co.uk/2012/09/what-ukip-man-says-about-making-non.html repeats verbatim what he said about wanting to sterilise women who want abortions and making non-European citizens in Europe second class citizens.

I was content to have it as an open group, but Stuart Hamilton wanted it closed and then finally secret.

Were we sharing porn with each other or something of that nature?  NO.

Why was he so obsessed with secrecy?

Because he feared jeopardising his social life and his chances of future employment.

I went along with it because I was at the time content to post there, and did not at the time see the harm of the group being secret.

However, when I read that a UKIP member in Exchanging Ideas, Mark Barnes, was saying that he wished to sterilise women who want an abortion, and that he wished to make non-Europeans living in Europe second class citizens, I could not hep but want an answer to this question:

"Why is this intensely chauvinistic and misogynistic man who wishes to treat other races as second class citizens and sterilise women who want an abortion in UKIP while I am forbidden to join just because I  am ex-BNP?"

What Mark Barnes wants goes much further than the BNP after all.  He really should join the NF with views like his.  However, he is too cowardly and hypocritical to do so and already knows the NF are full of proles he despises and wouldn't be seen dead with.

Also, his wife might object and his business might suffer.

So there you are.  Anyway, Mark Barnes is currently administrator of this secret Facebook group full of people who fear to express their political views in an open group.

That group is now cursed.

https://www.facebook.com/groups/466234513398453/ is a new group I have set up, called PUBLIC debate which is an OPEN group, for people who are not afraid to say what they mean, and who are able to defend their views morally and intellectually, but if not, withdraw them.

UKIP man wants women who want abortions sterilised

"If abortion must be countenanced then at least sterilise the defective life-bearer at the same time to prevent a repeat of this monstrousness from occurring in the future. Those who refuse to bear life when they took on board the responsibility to create it in the first place, ought not to be given a second chance."

Why is this man a member of UKIP while I am not allowed to join just because I am ex-BNP?