BNP v UKIP should now be BNP + UKIP = BNIP (British National Independence Party) led by Claire Khaw if no one else will do it

"No UK political party is a serious party until it has at least one MP. This means UKIP are just as much a joke as the BNP are, but the BNP are funnier."

What the Eurosceptic parties need to do: START A NATIONAL DEBATE

The Eurosceptic parties should be talking about things like

1. fewer laws
2. lower taxes
3. grammar schools AKA selective/traditional education
4. single sex secondary state schools
5. reintroducing fault into divorce
6. family values supported by marriage
7. stigmatising never married single mothers 
8. the condign punishment of criminals (corporal and capital punishment)
9. repealing totalitarian liberal anti-discrimination THOUGHTCRIME legislation
10. withdrawing from the European Convention of Human Rights (an extremist liberal cabal)
11. repealing the Human Rights Act
12. distancing itself from Israel and America and moving closer to China and Russia
13. ending all liberal interventionism and aggression in Afraqbya
14. questioning the reasons why the LibLabCon are so obsessed by Overseas Aid when they know it cannot possibly win them any votes
15. responsible borrowing and lending by the individual and the government and examining the reasons for the Koranic prohibition against usury whose purpose is to prevent the boom-bust cycle 
16. a stable currency and the pound that keeps its value in your pocket (connected to an honest and responsible fiscal policy) so you don't have to gamble with your savings
17. a return to Pounds Shillings and Pence so that British children will at least learn their times tables again
18. disestablishing the Church of England because they are no longer fit for purpose and are infested by feminists, extremist liberals, socialists and Communists 
19. questioning and challenging the pernicious effects of feminism
20. legalising prostitution so that single mothers can support themselves without looking to the overburdened taxpayer
21. abolishing the BBC licence fee so non-liberals no longer have to pay for liberal propaganda
22. saving the the public house from closure and preventing the liberal establishment from completely abolishing free speech 

My strategy for the General Election: BNP and UKIP to campaign under a JOINT manifesto

UKIP manifesto

BNP manifesto

1. The responsible voter should vote for the party with the most policies they agree with. If they don't know what party has the policies they most agree with and cannot be bothered to find out, they should just stay out of politics because they are too stupid to vote.

2. Those who intend to vote BNP or UKIP as a protest vote against the LibLabCon should vote for the BNP or UKIP candidate most likely to get the most votes.

There. Not too complicated, is it?

Those who agree with my strategy should start discussing it with as many people as possible.

Those who want to take this further, and want BNP-UKIP to merge should discuss it amongst themselves as much as possible.

Believe me, it is the only way forward and  CAN BE DONE.

All BNP and UKIP have to do for the next General Election is to come to an arrangement to campaign under a JOINT manifesto.

Joint

The BNP-UKIP Joint Manifesto would promise to have a referendum on

1. whether to withdraw from the EU; and

2. whether to adopt BNP or UKIP policies where they differ

Beautifully simple, is it not?

http://thevoiceofreason-ann.blogspot.com/2011/06/being-libertarian-enough-to-tolerate.html

Further arguments for BNP-UKIP merger (sent to me by SMS):

1. UKIP did very poorly in recent council elections and gained only FOUR seats though they fielded 1217 candidates.  Despite being BNP in Oldham/Barnsley by elections this year, UKIP seem to have returned to pattern of being irrelevant in local elections in between  Euro elections.
2. Economic differences between BNP and UKIP may have been exaggerated.  Both would want to put Britain first and a discussion about policies could take place inside the same party.  Both have similar views on the EU, immigration and foreign aid.
3. Both parties badly need to refresh their public image.  Neither are really doing well. 

This is not exactly a new idea either and has been doing the rounds for years.

http://www.democracyforum.co.uk/british-government/23901-bnp-targeting-ukip-candidates.html

http://www.democracyforum.co.uk/british-government/50030-should-bnp-drop-its-colour-bar-merge-ukip.html

http://www.democracyforum.co.uk/british-government/31316-bnp-ukip-merger-plan-uncovered.html

http://www.democracyforum.co.uk/bnp/73005-should-bnp-ukip-now-merge.html


If you really really want to leave the EU as soon as possible you should discuss this with as many people as possible.

If you are not tired of wasting your time, energy and money getting people to vote for a party that you know will be useless about leaving the EU, then you must carry on as before, of course.

If you are afraid of being called racist and think you will die the moment you are accused, then of course you must steer well clear of this frightening proposal.

If you are a party leader and doing OK and earning a nice income out of being leader of your own party and don't wish to share your toys and your soldiers, then of course you will HATE this idea.

People who are not doing this for fun and want to get somewhere before the EU implodes will love the strength and simplicity of this idea.

Stupid scared people will not, of course, and there are sadly too many people like that in and out of politics.

To AV or AV not?

I don't like AV but would vote for it to destabilise the current corrupt and sclerotic system, which has to be destroyed before a phoenix can rise from its ashes.

It would also hurry BNP and UKIP into a merger who must know by now that people tend to vote Green as a protest vote because they see it as respectable and won't get them into trouble with their liberal friends at their liberal dinner parties.

A merger of BNP and UKIP must be done ASAP or this country will wake up finding itself ruled by the Greens from whom you will get more rules and more taxes in the name of the environment as well as more PC liberalism.

In this mock election by Five Live today, BNP went first, then UKIP, then the LibDems, then the Tories, and finally Labour, leaving the Green Party woman to rule over Brentford and Isleworth.

I do not know the demographics of the voters in that mock election, but my guess is that they are mostly female and mostly unemployed, so voting Green is entirely in keeping with the mentality of these people.

http://www.bbc.co.uk/5live/

http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-politics-11243595

http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-politics-11609887

http://www.newstatesman.com/blogs/the-staggers/2011/03/simple-compared-post-past

The likelihood is that most voters who bother to vote on AV will vote for change just for the sake of change because it is a way of showing dissatisfaction with the current system and going against what the Tories want.



Nobody really understands AV anyway.   But it is a way of affirming mediocrity, ie making sure that the candidate with the most second choice votes wins.  The Greens are largely perceived as harmless because they have not had a chance to mess things up.

"Cut open a Green and you will find a Red."

Below is an email I have sent to the BBC at Wed, 30 March, 2011 13:23:15 requesting that they explain their methods of audience selection.

Hi Victoria

Would you be so kind as to let me know what questions would have been asked of anyone applying to be in the audience in Osterley?

A UKIP friend is suggesting that any BBC audience is hopelessly rigged against BNP/UKIP.

http://thevoiceofreason-ann.blogspot.com/2011/03/to-av-or-av-not.html contains my views on AV, should you be interested.

It may also interest you to know I am being actively considered to be the 2012 BNP London mayoral candidate, though many's a slip twixt the cup and the lip!  

I look forward to hearing from you.

Regards

Claire Khaw

Embarrassing photographs of a certain UKIP-supporting South African

I have just been circulated with some embarrassing photos of a certain UKIP-supporting white South African.

I have actually shaken hands with him.

That was at one of those Freedom in the City lunchtime meetings at the Counting House.

http://anewlifeforjesus.blogspot.com/

http://www.beerintheevening.com/pubs/s/35/3534/Counting_House/Bank

Of course, his sex fetishes are none of my business and do not in fact detract from the virtues and virility of Euroscepticism.  I just wish men would be more careful and stop themselves from getting too carried away, especially with women they don't even know and should not trust.

Men really are the weaker sex when it comes to, well, sex.

My friend the late Mike Smith would have enjoyed this story though.  The last time I saw Mike Smith was at a Swinton Circle meeting at which he stood up and declared the intention of suing Alan Harvey.

Mike made legal history by being the first person to sue for libel committed online.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Michael_Keith_Smith

Proposed BNP-UKIP Anschluss - why there is NOT - I repeat NOT - a problem

It seems Eddy Butler is coming round to my view of a BNP-UKIP merger.  Below is an extract of his rather statesman-like posting:



http://eddybutler.blogspot.com/2011/01/what-should-happen-in-2011.html

Most sensible nationalists would agree theoretically that the ‘best thing’ would be if all the political groupings on the patriotic, nationalistic, ‘right-wing’, populist, non-politically correct, identity-related side of the spectrum united. That would create a large broad-based party that could realistically challenge for power.

Within that spectrum can be found UKIP, the BNP, the English Democrats and a variety of other smaller groups and independents most of which have split off from one or other of the named parties. This new party would instantly create an organisation with still over a hundred councillors at all levels, a directly elected Mayor, a GLA member, several members of the House of Lords and fifteen MEPs. The party would have over 30,000 members. It would instantly be a major force in British politics. It would have gained the equivalent of nearly 3.8 million votes at the last European election. It would no longer be part of the fringe.

Said UKIP teen bigot and sceptic Leon Georghiou:

"I will steadfastly oppose any UKIP-BNP merger that doesn't mirror the present UKIP manifesto. Of particular concern to me are: free market economics, minarchism, and classical liberalism. The BNP are, of course, the total opposite: socialist, statist, and interventionist. The parties are too fundamentally different for a merger to work or, indeed, be on the horizon, thank God."

I said:

I have addressed this problem countless times, Leon. You obviously don't pay attention. Do you not remember my proposal of:

1. Merged BNP-UKIP promise a referendum on leaving the EU or not

2. Merged BNP-UKIP promise a referendum on whether to have UKIP or BNP economic policies at the same time they are having a referendum on whether to stay in the EU or not.

Sorted.

Am I or am I not fucking brilliant?

Hint: only one answer allowed.

If I were leader of this party - just supposing - it would deflect any suggestion of racism once and for all.  I have never said anything racist because I do not believe that any race is inherently superior or inferior to another.  But I am a Nationalist in the sense that I believe that an ideology of

(1) defining
(2) ascertaining and
(3) pursuing the broad long term National Interest (as opposed to narrow short term party interest)

would be the best way to govern any country.  

The National Interest would necessarily be a judicious balance of the conflicting interests of the peoples of Britain who are, like any other land, divided by race, religion, class and gender.

The National Interest as I see it is therefore not synonymous with the interests of any one group of people, though it is undeniable that the National Interest would favour the majority group of Britain, which also happens to be white and working class.

I see no harm at all in pursuing policies that would favour the the advancement of the lower middle classes - which after all make up most of the BNP.  They are independent traders - rather like Del Boy and Trotters Independent Traders, men in white vans, taxi-drivers and the self employed, ie the people who instinctively want to shift for themselves of all classes, races and faiths.

The slogans would be very simple, popular and memorable:

1.  lower taxes
2.  fewer laws
3.  family values supported by marriage
4.  make punishment fit the crime

Am I fucking brilliant or am I fucking brilliant?

Why I joined the BNP - Part II

I keep being asked this question. I refer the questioner to the answer I have already given at http://thevoiceofreason-ann.blogspot.com/2010/10/why-i-joined-bnp.html

Frankly, being a non-white, I am as much an alien to the upper classes of white people as I am to the middle classes of white people.  The white urban proletariat are no more and no less my people than the white people of other classes and the brown and yellow people of various classes, religions and political affiliations.

I like to think I am a citizen of the world anyway and that any sensible person would want the best for the country he or she is living in permanently.  

I will say this though: I know I would be a member of the BNP if I were white and born in this country ought of sheer bloody mindedness.  How dare the liberal establishment tell me I cannot complain about immigration without immediately turning myself into an evil extremist Nazi Fascist Racist bigot?  So fuck them.  Joining the BNP is the most effective way to tell them where and how and how hard to go fuck themselves.

You could always join UKIP of course, but the message would not be quite so forceful.  That is because they run for cover and hide under their beds the moment a liberal starts to say the word "rrrrrrrr acist" ... 

That does tend to limit their scope for action.  The fact that UKIP have a policy of barring anyone who is ex-BNP from joining them is another example of their bourgeois cowardice and hypocrisy, but if you are scared of being called racist, off you go to UKIP - the other half of the Eurosceptic movement.  Join them if you are socially insecure and are afraid of being called racist.  If you are even more frit then you stay with the same crap LibLabCon party that you are now with.

A lesson from the Romans on morality (or why we should learn Latin)

Any Latin teacher will confirm that the Romans used the same word for must and should ie debeo.

http://www.allverbs.com/cache/verbtables/9/d/debeo.shtml

This means most Romans thought that we must do the things we should, and we should do the things we must.

And that is why the Romans were so good at getting things done.

Sadly, in our ignorant and benighted times of "progressive" education, there is great confusion and cowardice between making a prediction and expressing a view that something is morally desirable. 

Those who fear to express their view that something should happen, are moral cowards who fear being told, "Yeah, but it would never happen, mate."

However, if more of us expressed the opinion that something should happen, then it increases its likelihood of it happening, because many people are in awe of conventional wisdom and likely to follow, even if tragically unaware of how easily it can be subverted.

I am therefore saying that a BNP-UKIP Anschluss would give the Eurosceptic movement the turbo-charge it so desperately needs.

Should this happen, and it is right that it should if the people in the Eurosceptic movement don't want to have wasted their time, then it would take things forward a little bit more.

The respective leaders of UKIP and BNP would doubtless prefer to remain the big fish in their own respective small ponds, as long as they are receiving an income, but that would mean that the grassroots will have wasted their time for all these years in a moribund and hopelessly divided movement.  Unless they are happy with occupational therapy, I suggest they aspire to higher things.

Their respective policy differences, ie Protectionist v Free Trade, Libertarian v Statist, sending non-whites "home", voluntarily or not, can be settled after withdrawal from the EU, where a referendum can be held on which the voting public prefer.

In the meantime it is only necessary that the Eurosceptic movement agree that the question should be asked and to promise to abide by the decision of the majority. 

I propose that the name of this new party be the British National Independence Party (the "B-Nips" for short) to reflect its new merged character. (This event would of course bring in the even  more moribund English Democrats - ie the UKIP rejects, and give them something constructive to do with their sad little lives.)

This would be a marvellous opportunity to draft a new democratic constitution that would protect the rights of individual members against abuse by the leader and his cronies.  (I trust that The Expelled One and The Suspended 30 of the BNP would doubtless agree with me on this and I hope that they will use their considerable experience to support this idea.)

Doubters and detractors should bear in mind that the Liberals and the SDP merged in the 1980s and are now in government.

"BNP chief hits back at The Freedom Association"

http://www.londonspinonline.com/2010/12/bnp-chief-hits-back-at-tfa.html

Apparently, I am supposed to be this "BNP chief" and "director" - which is enormously flattering, but not strictly true!

Below is what London Spin said:

Tuesday, December 21, 2010

BNP Chief Hits Back at TFA

BRITISH NATIONAL PARTY Director Claire Khaw has lambasted the Freedom Association in an online web rant. Writing on her blog, The Voice of Reason, Khaw said, “Should the BNP demand an apology for being called Nazis by the TFA? I would have thought that that was defamatory and cannot in fact be justified.”

She continued, “You would have thought that an outfit called The Freedom Association would be pleased to be defending the free speech and free association of others, but not a bit of it, it seems. The TFA is really a Eurosceptic organisaton that appears to think it is doing so well it can dismiss the other half of the Eurosceptic movement, ie the BNP.

If the Eurosceptic movement has not been terribly successful, the reason is the hesitant timorousness of its activists as well as its back-stabbing snobbery of those who do not come from the same class and live in the same leafy suburbs as they,” she added.

My attempts to give the Libertarians a few big ideas to further the cause not received well by ingrates and incompetent amateurs

http://libertarianalliance.wordpress.com/2010/11/18/chris-r-tame-memorial-prize-2010/#comment-32446 is the Libertarian Alliance blog whose Director Sean Gabb would not give me the £1000 prize for my brilliant essay in 2007 about how to move from big government to rationally small government. 

I seem to have upset Anna Raccoon at http://www.annaraccoon.com/silliness/happiness/comment-page-1/#comment-26974 who thinks I am in no position to criticise the Libertarian Party's totalitarian and fascist rule that you cannot join it if you are a member of another party.  Indeed, it expelled Matt Davies - one of the more courageous Libertarians I know, just for supporting UKIP. 

This is my suggestion to them which is currently awaiting moderation:

A small unknown and unregarded party with high entry requirements seems to me to be a peculiarly self-destructive formula. Pride is after all a deadly sin.

There is a history of incompetent amateurism in the Libertarian Party and I am only trying to help.

If I were to become a member of the Libertarian Party after the appropriate changes in the constitution allow me and others to join your party, then I could be more of a help.

The yawn factor of yet another hopeless small party would be greatly reduced if I were to join or indeed if I were myself to lead it, as I do after all have ideology in truckloads, already prepared earlier.

A charismatic, media-savvy leader with an eye for the soundbite backed up with my legal training would attract a great deal of publicity, particularly with my BNP connections.

If reported it would give both the BNP and the Libertarian Party the oxygen of publicity and air the vexed subject of party democracy.

Anna Raccoon did however display this:

I believe the quickest way to rationally small government is through a narrower taxpayer-only franchise operating under a direct democracy in a one-party state with a party constitution that protects the rights of its members against the leader and his cronies.

The West derived its democratic traditions from Ancient Athens and Republican Rome which did not have parties, only shifting factions.

Party democracy is therefore crucial to the quality of democracy we have, but no one – not even MPs it seems – get this.

Peter Bone’s House of Commons Disqualification Bill (second reading 10 December 2010) will regrettably not get the support it needs.

http://thevoiceofreason-ann.blogspot.com/2010/11proposed-survey-for-mps-who-supported.html explains why it matters so much.

I suppose I shouldn't be so didactic, because people don't like to be told.  But then what is the point of not explaining things in the clearest possible terms when Libertarians are being so incompetent and amateurish, and give libertarianism such a bad name?

I would gladly give way to anyone who can do what I do better, but as far as I know, no one does it better.  I suppose it was a bit cheeky of me to suggest that I would be a better leader than Andrew Withers, just because

1. I already have a certain notoriety
2. I can write reasonably grammatical and clear English (unlike Andrew Withers)
3. I have been legally trained
4. I have a history of creative political activism, eg Jury Team, joining the BNP to stand up for the rights of white working class people to complain about immigration and being one of the first to point out that all anti-discrimination legislation is THOUGHTCRIME
5. I have a bit of a following on Twitter and Facebook
6. I am responsible for http://www.1party4all.co.uk
7. it has been said by my Facebook friends, detractors and supporters that I am "dangerous" and "scary"
8. I am a bit of a political anorak with some knowledge of theology, history, philosophy, current affairs and finance 
9. have Facebook friends who span the entire political spectrum
10. I am in the process of building up a personality cult
11. I just know I would be good on TV

Commando-style raids on UK, France and Germany ordered by Bin Laden

http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/worldnews/asia/afghanistan/8036423/Osama-bin-Laden-behind-plot-to-attack-European-cities.html


It wouldn't be too hard to launch a commando style shoot-out in a shopping centre, I would have thought, especially with Xmas coming up. It would completely destroy tourism and shopping in the UK. Somebody tell me again why the fuck we are in Afghanistan pissing these people off who understandably don't want foreign soldiers in their country shooting at their people either? 

Bin Laden said it 9/11 was about Israel. http://www.foxnews.com/story/0,2933,137095,00.html 

So why THE FUCK are we dying for Israel? What has that misbegotten shithole of a country ever done for Britain? Why are British gentiles dying for Zionism?  Are they STOOOPID or something?  How many Jews or Zionists in the Armed Forces?  Are the dead and limbless not overwhelmingly gentile?  Answers on a postcard, please.

Why the Eurosceptic parties are useless cunts and a fucking waste of space

http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-1315735/EU-warns-Britain-stop-thousands-migrants-claiming-welfare-handouts.html

Because they, ie UKIP, BNP, English Democrats, SWP, think they can by themselves alone persuade the LibLabCon to give us a referendum on the EU as they divide and dilute the Eurosceptic vote General Election after General Election after General Election.  

Now, why the fuck would they think that? 

The rate they are going, the LibLabCon will have withdrawn from the EU and say they thought of it and did  it first by the time the Eurosceptic parties get their act together to do anything that would actually work. 

That is how shit the Eurosceptic parties are.

Of course, a merger of the Eurosceptic parties (either temporary or permanent) on just this one issue would be the sensible way forward.  All they have to do is say:

"Forget all the other stuff we disagree about, just remember if we don't get out of the EU nothing happens anyway and this shit will just continue till we are all dead."

Not exactly rocket science, is it?  But it is in this country for some reason.  Must be all the dumbed-down education the British keep "learning".

Perhaps what all the Eurosceptic parties want to do is become MEPs and have the EU as their paymasters who would pay them better than if they became mere MPs at Westminster.  If that is the case then we are all being conned, even by the people who keep telling us that we are being conned.

The late Michael Keith Smith

I am proud to have known Mike Smith and to have had the benefit of his advice when he very firmly discouraged me from joining the other losers when I was thinking of becoming a parliamentary candidate for the Howden & Haltemprice by-election called by David Davis in July 2008. It was he who suggested that I go up instead to help David Davis and do a bit of networking, and that was what I did.

http://thevoiceofreason-ann.blogspot.com/2009/03/howden-haltemprice-election-10-july.html

We first met online when crossing swords with each other on the treatment of homosexuals.  It emerged that he did not propose to do anything horrible to them, and only wanted to be rude about them, which seemed fair enough to me. 

He was a larger than life figure - in both senses of the word - and was widely known to be litigious.  I only recently discovered that he suffered from manic depression.

This does tally with his tendency to be recklessly indiscreet at times which I imagine he would later regret.  Indeed, I imagine that this cycle of exuberance and then later regret may be quite damaging to one's psyche.

When younger, I myself used to suffer a little from serial episodes of grandiloquent exuberance followed by regret, remorse and shame.   It seems that as I grow older, I become more confident and less plagued by feelings of regret and shame.  Perhaps this is one of the unsung benefits of maturity and experience, and I am happy to report that I am now under a more even keel. 

Mike threw himself off Porchester Castle, which is to me a gesture grandly dramatic, heroic and romantic.  I like to think I would have done the same, were I minded to commit suicide and lived near a castle.

The first time I met him was at the Bung Hole in the Strand, and we later attended a dinner at Simpsons in the Strand http://www.simpsonsinthestrand.co.uk/restaurant.php at which Simon Heffer, who was guest of honour, was wearing a kilt. 

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Michael_Keith_Smith

http://www.dailyecho.co.uk/news/8954068.Desperate_plea_to_stop_suicide_at_castle/

He became unwell in early 2008 and attempted to move the CDA closer to the centre ground, and warmly endorsed party leader David Cameron's "Agenda for Change", declaring in a speech that he wants to see more members of minority groups taking senior positions within the Conservative Party.

I remember him telling me that he had decided to support Cameron because he knew Cameron was going to win and he was tired of being in the fringes of UKIP.

Some time later he switched back to being on the fringes, because he just "couldn't stand it any more". 

Whatever one thought of Mike - and he had many enemies - one of his particular charms was his radiant and disarming honesty.

How well I remember him taking me around the Bournemouth Conference 2006 and knowing exactly which fringe meetings provided the best hospitality - the dullest ones of course - eg the Country Land and Business Association, the Manchester Airport Group.  The hospitality of the Freedom Association - Better Off Out Prohibition Do was however both entertaining and generous. 

We saw Francis Maude and I remember Mike mockingly saying "Hello Francis" like a schoolboy mocking a prefect, which only elicited a cold silence.  It was in Bournemouth that Mike admitted to me that he was a bit soft on getting rid of the welfare state.   I also remember him complaining that Theresa May only climbed to her position she did just because she was a woman and could get away with dressing like like a vulgar attention-seeking tart.  If he could he would do the same too, if that was a way up the greasy pole, but of course that option was not open to him, being a mere man. 

I remember too him speaking at the UKIP press conference, which Sky were filming.  Those of us who wanted to smoke, including Nigel Farage, spilled out into the garden of this hotel but were told to go back in by security, in case we were terrorists in possession of rocket launchers which we could fire from the garden into the likes of Cameron and his cronies who were in buildings visible from where we were.  

Once I incurred his wrath because I innocently reported a dinner he was organising on http://www.1party4all.co.uk  This was because he feared sabotage by his detractors whom he thought would play tricks to get it cancelled.  He very graciously accepted the profuse apologies I offered.

After he decided to climb aboard the Cameron Catamaran he held a dinner which I attended out of loyalty.  I already knew he had gone native because the subject of the talk was not about immigration, the EU or the cowardice and hypocrisy of Cameron and the usual topics, but English music. 


The last public occasion was at the Swinton Circle meeting when he announced, apropos of nothing, that he would destroy Alan Harvey, who had apparently libeled him. 


He has gone, but will not be forgotten, a giant amongst pygmies.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Portchester_Castle
http://technology.timesonline.co.uk/tol/news/tech_and_web/article743902.ece
http://www.portsmouth.co.uk/newshome/Tributes-paid-to-political-figure.6404791.jp

http://announcements.telegraph.co.uk/deaths/118761/keith-smith

Electon Slogans for GE 2010

"Hang the LibLabCon and vote BNP-UKIP! Or choose between a Future F*cked by Labour or a C*nt of Convictionless Conservatism."

BNPUKIP

*B*ritish
*N*o more
*P*olitical Correctness
*U*nited in
*K*icking LibLabCon
*I*nto
*P*oo

Party

David Wilshire compares treatment of MPs to Hitler's treatment of Jews

http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/newstopics/mps-expenses/conservative-mps-expenses/6480680/MPs-expenses-David-Wilshire-compares-treatment-of-politicians-to-Jews-in-Nazi-Germany.html

Some may think this is a bit over the top, but MPs are social pariahs, even more despised than all the immigrants legal and illegal, asylum seekers failed and bogus they have let in.

Was there not talk of Resettlement Grants recently in relation to MPs?

Where would they be expelled to, I wondered, for a brief mad moment. Madagascar?

The only way they can redeem themselves now is if they all joined the BNP, demanded a BNP-UKIP merger and campaigned for an EU referendum.

But they won't because they are feeble-minded cowards and weaklings, despicable and hypocritical.

Perhaps concentration camps can be set up for them near the House since they are no longer allowed a second home allowance.

They can join Brian Haw who has established a camp there. Their joining him in protesting against the Iraq war may dispose the public to relent when it comes to sending them to the extermination camps that are now being built to receive them.

http://www.indymedia.org.uk/en/2006/06/342704.html