OFFICIAL: women CANNOT be criticised in the Demented Matriarchy that is Paedo Bastard Britain Slutland

Simon Murray cannot speak the truth about women in Totalitarian Matriarchy that is Paedo Bastard Britain Slutland

Glencore chairman Simon Murray criticised for sexism
Glencore’s new chairman has been widely condemned for making “unacceptable” and “deplorable” sexist remarks, raising further corporate governance concerns ahead of the commodity trader’s planned $60bn (£37bn) stock market debut.

http://www.telegraph.co.uk/finance/newsbysector/industry/mining/8471301/Glencore-chairman-Simon-Murray-criticised-for-sexism.html


Who would now deny that we live in a Demented Matriarchy?   Only the emasculated effeminate shits like Sir Roger Carr, Lord Davies and Vince "Eeyore" Cable.

It has now got so bad that men need the women to speak up for them.

I have now undertaken this task though my political ambitions - there is a theoretical possibility that I may be chosen as the 2012 BNP London mayoral candidate - may soon run into the buffers as I have been told that my pro-AV stance is at odds with the BNP's anti-AV stance, and that my regular denunciations of single motherhood will alienate potential female supporters, which the BNP now wish to attract with their new heart logo amongst other things.

Since I have entered politics to speak out about the things I believe in, I shall certainly not be shutting up about the main reason - feminism - why white people are now in their current degraded and degenerate state. (Feminism encourages paedophilia as well as female promiscuity and single parenthood.  http://thevoiceofreason-ann.blogspot.com/2009/04/louis-theroux-place-for-paedophiles.html)

I see that all white men who dare to challenge feminism end up apologising profusely or denying what they had in fact said.

I shall not be doing any of that.

In fact, I think I would be the best BNP London mayoral candidate because I am saying things that many BNP men think but dare not say for fear of alienating their women.  So yes, lots of BNP men are just as pussy-whipped as their LibLabCon counterparts.  In fact, because they are more shunned by women than their LibLabCon counterparts, they are probably even more desperate to gain their approval.

I am the only BNP candidate that understands what has happened to the British and feels it her duty to keep saying it until everyone understands the point I am making.  I want good things for white people of all classes because I wish to continue living here, and it would sadden me that this country cannot be saved from feminism because white people are now so infested with all the feminine vices of irrationality, hypocrisy and cowardice that they cannot now save themselves from feminism.  It is for this reason that I feel I must now step into the breach.

I imagine that a male BNP candidate would fear his wife leaving him for saying anti-feminist things, or his girlfriend shunning him and potential female partners also shunning him.  The thought of never having sex with a woman ever again would force him into submitting to the shrieks of the demented matriarchy that has turned white working class people into a degenerate race of illegitimate, singly-parenting welfare-dependent scum whom British employers shun and avoid like the plague in favour of foreign labour.

I however am not that bothered if I don't have sex with a woman ever again.  Indeed, it is possible that my saying what I say will excite much interest in men and women wishing to have sex with me.  For all I know, they will be throwing themselves at my feet when I am Mayor of London .... or even if I am not.

But if I never have sex with a man or a woman again that is a noble sacrifice I am prepared to make for the benefit of sex-addicted white people whom I wish to save from themselves.

The greater prize of becoming Mayor of London which I may have to sacrifice because of my anti-feminist stance I suppose I must also come to terms with.

The BNP selection panel should also know that no UKIP mayoral candidate will be saying anything against feminism (though I believe they have plans to say they want to legalise brothel-keeping).

The BNP selection panel should also know that no London mayoral candidate who does not have the Muslim bloc vote ever gets elected mayor and that is why our Red Ken so skillfully cultivated them.

The BNP selection panel should know that I would probably the only BNP London mayoral candidate that would attract any significant Muslim votes, because I have taken the trouble to understand their religion and their concerns and have visited their mosques and spoken to their scholars both radical and moderate.

Muslims will already know that I am the BNP peacenik opposed the invasions of Muslim lands, who deplores the war in "Afraqbya" and have been regular denouncing Liberal Western aggression for many years now in my blogs.

Muslims will know how often I have told them that they are fools for supporting the very parties that make war on Muslim nations while being in needless fear and hatred of a party that - though unashamed about their dislike of Muslims - has quite categorically stated that they would never have  invaded "Afrabya" because it is not in the British National Interest to say they wish to save Muslims from each other by bombing and invading their countries, unquestioningly supporting Israel, and then complaining about Muslim terrorism.

Even if I do not attract enough Muslim voters to make me Mayor of London, I believe I have a pretty good chance of doing better than the previous BNP London mayoral candidates and of showing that Muslims and the BNP have quite a number of things in common chief of which is promoting family values supported by marriage.

http://order-order.com/2009/09/29/exclusive-browns-gulags-for-slags-policy-taken-from-bnp/

So there.

Conclusive sign that Western leaders don't know what they are doing

http://news.xinhuanet.com/english2010/world/2011-04/23/c_13841994.htm

When France and Britain decided to bomb Libya, did they really not see that a flood of refugees from Africa to Europe would be inevitable, strengthening the support for nationalist and anti-immigrant parties?

If they did not, they must have been warned, one would have thought.

If they had been warned, why did they not listen?

Is it cos they have shit for brains because they are the political establishment in a demented matriarchy and have a compulsion to keep doing mad and silly things?

Bombing Libya is not really a foreign policy objective, it is just a manifestation of a compulsion to intervene, just like one may have a compulsion to masturbate, shop, drink, take drugs or gamble.

I certainly saw it coming and offer my services to this benighted country to be Dictator of Britain so that it may once again have a rational domestic and foreign policy.

Other candidates should also offer themselves too, of course, and we could be elected by SMS and AV.

Superb opportunity for Monarchy to become more popular and distance itself from war in Afghanistan etc. (Ed Milband did that and became Labour leader!)

Muslim fanatics have warned they may burn Union Jack flags on the day of the Royal Wedding

http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/uknews/royal-wedding/8460702/Royal-wedding-Muslim-group-applies-for-permission-to-protest-outside-Westminster-Abbey.html

"I believe that the Queen and her children are supportive of the war in Afghanistan, which translates to us as a war against Muslims." 

There are no coherent foreign policy reasons for invading Iraq, Afghanistan or Libya to impose regime-change because they all hate and resent us for even thinking that we have a right to tell them what to do.

Because there are already so many Muslims in Britain who are also outraged that the West should casually, thoughtlessly, unadvisedly invade three Muslim lands, the people of Britain are also in danger of terrorism. However, the chief danger is not so much terrorism but paranoia about Muslim terrorism that will take away all their liberties eventually.

So, if the Queen should decide to distance herself from the war and assure Anjem Choudary and his lot that none of the Royal Family support the invasion of Muslim lands, she would be doing herself, as well as the Muslims and non-Muslims of this country a very good turn, by causing an unpopular war to rapidly becoming even more unpopular and perhaps have the effect of bringing our boys home, sooner rather than later, with less futile sacrifice of resources and lives.




My letters of today to the Secretaries at Clarence House and Buckingham Palace (Mr Jamie Lowther Pinkerton, Sir Michael Peat, Mrs Ailsa Anderson, Mr Christopher Geidt)

Anjem Choudary and his threats to disrupt The Wedding on 29 April 2011

May I suggest that the Queen, the Prince of Wales and Prince William take this opportunity of jointly distancing themselves from the very unpopular war in Afghanistan? 

 

It may upset the government but would certainly be very popular indeed with the people, both non-Muslim and Muslim, Radical and Moderate.  

Yours etc

Mystery of the Trinity solved (by Claire Khaw of the BNP who supports AV) in a tweet of 78 characters

(

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Holy_Trinity_(Masaccio)

Claire Khaw
@RevRichardColes @canontonymac I wonder if it is possible to discuss the mysteries of the Trinity by Twitter.
16 Apr

@RevRichardColes
Richard Coles
@1party4all @canontonymac There's challenge - the mystery of the trinity in 140 character chunks.
19 Apri


@RevRichardColes @canontonymac "The Trinity is the clear blue water Xtians put between themselves and the Jews." I make that 78 characters.
19 Apri


@RevRichardColes @canontonymac @SundayProgramme @williamcrawley Have explained mystery of Trinity in 78 characters.


@1party4all
Claire Khaw
@RevRichardColes @canontonymac @SundayProgramme @williamcrawley Trinity solved by BNP member.
19 Apri



@1party4all
Claire Khaw
@simon3862 @faisalislam Have explained the mysteries of the Trinity in one tweet of 78 characters. Bet @Phillip_Blond can't do that.
19 Apri


@1party4all
Claire Khaw
@cathynewman Have explained the mysteries of the Trinity in one tweet of 78 characters. Bet @Phillip_Blond can't do that
19 Apri 

How I would govern as Dictator of Britain and the use of AV to elect me

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dictator

http://thevoiceofreason-ann.blogspot.com/2011/04/let-us-have-democratically-elected.html

Should such a Dictator be elected using AV or FPTP?  I would suggest AV to make this dictatorial candidate work harder to position himself (or herself) on a broader popular base.   I am confident that I can do this reasonably well.

Please note that I would not abolish elections.  Even Dictators need to know how they are doing to stay in power and elections are required to let the ruler know what the governed think of his (or her) policies.  

In fact, I would allow the burning of effigies of myself because that would be a good way of knowing how much one is hated and give a dictator a chance to mend his (or her) ways.

http://thevoiceofreason-ann.blogspot.com/2011/04/khaws-dolls-and-effigies-for-voodoo.html

A quick request of how many effigies of me have been ordered would be a much quicker way of knowing what my people think of me than commissioning some hugely expensive YouGov or MORI poll.

Clara Khavius would be the Latin version of my name.   

Let us have a democratically elected dictator or a TV game show based on this idea

http://www.bbc.co.uk/programmes/b0105vth

A game show called Political X Factor on Saturday evening prime time with the winner being voted by SMS would have the nation transfixed and agog with expectation and excitement.

That would be much more fun than debating the merits and demerits of AV, PR, FTPT etc.  It is not the method of electing our leaders that is crap.  It is the policies of the oligarchy that are crap.

This is so because all the parties have crap constitutions that do not protect the rights of their members or properly define what ought to be the state ideology.

Only I know the secret of a decent constitution and my bargain with the British people would be that I would implement the changes that I regard are necessary and then retire from politics after a year, having put in place a political and legal system that can do without me after it is established.  

There is something for everyone - and by this I mean the governed and the governing establishment, I do assure you.  Just hear me out.   

Proposal for mock online election

Mock election should be conducted to minimise cost.  

All candidates as they were in the last General Election.  

All voters asked to state that they are registered voters at the time of voting.  

All voters required to select a constituency that corresponds to theirs and vote.

Voila!   

Why UKIP and BNP should support AV - because Cameron rejects it.

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=jAWmKgIOqv8