YouGov polls UKIP could be conducting now

If you have every considered voting UKIP, please answer the following questions:

Has feminism gone too far? Yes/No

Does feminism undermine marriage? Yes/No

Does undermining marriage undermine social conhesion? Yes/No

Is the purpose of social cohesion to protect society from its internal and external enemies? Yes/No

Are sluts and socialists always the internal enemies of society? Yes/No

"Feminism is supported by totalitarian anti-discrimination which undermines the principle of freedom of contract." Agree/Disagree

"Our liberties rest on the foundations of (1) the right to property (2) freedom of expression (3) freedom of contract (4) freedom of association and feminism undermines all of them." Agree/Disagree

"Men these days do not acquire any financial, social or emotional advantages when they marry, only the fear of being divorced by their wives for any reason whatsoever under the unfair and ruinous terms of no-fault divorce."  Agree/Disagree

"Most women in Britain are sluts, and that is why most British mothers are Slut Single Mothers." http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/uknews/2285670/Most-children-of-British-mothers-born-out-of-wedlock.html  Agree/Disagree

If people deserve the government they get, then what kind of government do a people who are mostly bastards and whose women are mostly sluts deserve? (a) Good government (b) The government they deserve

"If most men do not marry then most of the next generation will be illegitimate, with all the connotations of being a bastard brought up by a slut mother entails: of degeneracy, bad-parenting, under-achievement, delinquency, criminality, being abused in care homes by child sex predators after being abandoned into a care home by its immoral, stupid and irresponsible mother.  If the Conservative Party does not dare address this issue then this duty falls on the narrow weak shoulders of Nigel Farage whose mother we already know is an exhibitionist. http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-2816357/U-strip-thought-Nigel-Farage-colourful-Meet-mum-naked-calendar-girl-age-74.html  Men are everywhere compromised by the morals of their women and congenitally afraid of confronting them." Agree/Disagree

"If all men including leaders of all the political parties of Britain - and this includes the Prime Minister - are afraid of confronting sluts, then this means that all British men are lower than sluts and Slut Single Mothers." Agree/Disagree

"If all British men are lower than sluts and Slut Single Mothers, then it is no surprise at all that Muslims in Britain, whose religion tells them to lash 100 times those convicted of extramarital sex are, would refuse to integrate, for to integrate in this regard would mean suffering the same symptoms of effeminacy, degeneracy and depravity and passing this on to the next generation like a hereditary disease."  Agree/Disagree

Should UKIP be uncompromisingly denouncing the pointless wars the UK government has been embroiling its Armed Forces in since 2001? Yes/No

"The lower the morals of women, the lower the morals of men." Agree/Disagree

"The moment men say that there is nothing wrong in women having extramarital and premarital sex, men will start becoming lower than the Slut Single Mother (SSM) https://www.facebook.com/pages/Should-Spinster-Single-Mothers-be-lashed-100-times/417696111659379?fref=ts and come the slave of her." Agree/Disagree

"While it is understandable that we should be afraid of an enemy who is cleverer, richer and stronger than us, it is despicable and contemptible to submit to an enemy that one knows to be stupider, poorer and weaker than us because we want to have sex with her." Agree/Disagree

"A civilisation whose men are afraid of sluts and Slut Single Mothers cannot survive, let alone prosper, and would only become weaker, poorer and more degenerate the longer men remain afraid of confronting and challenging feminism." Agree/Disagree

"The operation of democracy in an environment of indiscriminate universal suffrage prevents mistakes from being corrected." Agree/Disagree

"The moment UKIP proposes that there shall be no representation without taxation, it will be declaring war on the nanny state whose over-bloated body feeds innumerable parasites at the expense of the productive worker and citizen. If its leader Nigel Farage refuses to grasp this nettle, he will be betraying the libertarian principles he claims to have." Agree/Disagree

"The longer politicians remain incapable of acknowledging the mistakes of the past, the worse the problem will become and the harder it will be to cure. UKIP must work up the courage of acknowledging these problems and propose practicable and reasonable solutions viz repealing the Equality Act 2010 and abolishing no fault divorce after purging the judiciary of its subversive elements viz libtards and feminazis." Agree/Disagree

"Feminism rests on the twin pillars of the Equality Act 2010 and no fault divorce. Once the former is repealed and the latter is abolished, we will have abolished feminism. Once we have abolished feminism, we will have rationally small government again." Agree/Disagree

Should UKIP make a point of not chasing the female vote? http://thebattlefieldoflove.blogspot.co.uk/2010/10/case-for-disenfranchsing-women-or-why.html Yes/No

Claire Khaw's advice to Rozanne Duncan expelled from UKIP for her allegedly "jaw-dropping" comments

http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-politics-30576857

http://www.independent.co.uk/news/uk/politics/ukip-expels-councillor-rozanne-duncan-for-jawdropping-comments-made-in-tv-interview-9938852.html

Ms Duncan has been expelled by UKIP for "bringing the party into disrepute" but we still have no idea what she actually said and will not know what she said until the BBC documentary is finally broadcast in February 2015.

She was expelled on 20 December 2014 according to http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-2882954/Now-Ukip-axes-councillor-jaw-dropping-TV-interview-Party-member-links-far-right-group.html

One cannot help but think that it might prove to be a bit of an anti-climax since she must have known she was being interviewed by the Blibtard Broadcasting Corporation. Kerry Smith, the ex-UKIP PPC was made to resign after a telephone conversation he thought was private was leaked to the Mail.  http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-2872943/Farage-s-golden-boy-s-rant-pooftahs-Chigwell-Peasants-Chinky-bird-Astonishing-leaked-phone-calls-expose-outbursts-Ukip-man-sent-replace-Neil-Hamilton.html

This conversation was not leaked by UKIP's opponents but came from within UKIP itself the members of which are now ratting on each other in order to jockey for position to become PPCs in the hope of becoming MPs. http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-politics-30476383

The power that be in UKIP are have decided that Rozanne Duncan be tried by media.

While no one has the faintest idea of what her "jaw-dropping" comments to the BBC were, everyone is now convinced that they were indeed "jaw-dropping".

No doubt when they are finally broadcast sometime in February 2015, jaws will all obediently drop, though it strikes me that they cannot be that bad if she knew she was being interviewed for the BBC and must have been watching her words if she had had her wits about her.

If UKIP are going to expel her for bringing the party into disrepute, then time should not begin to run until the day her allegedly "jaw-dropping" comments have been broadcast, and it should be from that date in February 2015 that the 28 days she has to appeal from her expulsion should run.

Even a careful reading of http://www.ukip.org/the_constitution does not disclose a Rule 15 that she is alleged to have infringed at http://www.theguardian.com/politics/2014/dec/21/ukip-councillor-rozanne-duncan-expelled-kent-tv-interview, since the UKIP constitution only goes as far as Rule 14.

She should inform UKIP as soon as possible that while she accepts it is theoretically possible for her to be found guilty of bringing the party into disrepute  - a very wide and vague catch-all accusation - none of this can be decided by UKIP until the British public has had a chance to react to what she actually said.

The only way of objectively measuring if she has brought the party into disrepute can be established only by the asking of these two questions in a YouGov poll.

1. Are you considering or have you ever considered voting for UKIP in GE 2015?
2. What has Rozanne Duncan's allegedly "jaw-dropping" comments had on your intention to vote UKIP? (a) No effect at all, I was never going to vote for that bunch of racists anyway. (b) They are so "jaw-dropping" they have made me decide not to even though I was planning to vote for them. (c) Those allegedly "jaw-dropping" comments have strengthened my resolve to vote UKIP.

At the moment it is the UKIP leadership itself bringing the party into disrepute by the way it has abused the rights of its members and then broadcasting this fact to the media.

I would actually be delighted to assist her and represent her in this regard since I find the lack of protection and due process all members of all parties suffer from disgraceful and corrupt.

http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-2882954/Now-Ukip-axes-councillor-jaw-dropping-TV-interview-Party-member-links-far-right-group.html

Ukip have expelled a prominent local councillor who is understood to have links with a far-Right group, it emerged last night.

What does this mean exactly? I am sure she has never been a member of the BNP, unlike me. Perhaps she was once seen having a conversation with a BNP supporter? Who knows?

If this woman is going to be purged as being too plebeian and foot in the mouth to represent UKIP as PPC as Kerry Smith was, as many are about to, then let them be purged, but let there also be due process.

Winston McKenzie has also been suspended, not on grounds of his race as many would instantly assume but because he is not the brightest bulb in the box and because he is known for being more than a bit of a clown. http://www.croydonadvertiser.co.uk/Ukip-suspend-Winston-McKenzie-Lambeth-Croydon/story-25740404-detail/story.html

If UKIP expel her she can always jump ship to the BNP whom I am sure would receive her with open arms, but I hope she will dispute her expulsion for as long as possible when it has been done in such a disgracefully high-handed way that are clearly against the rules of natural justice as well as being dementedly illogical.

How on earth can this woman be said to have brought UKIP into disrepute by words said in an interview not yet broadcast when what she said has not been made public? 

Her expulsion cannot be said to take effect until that interview is broadcast and she cannot be said to have brought the party into disrepute until the YouGov poll I have proposed is conducted and the results disclosed. 


If UKIP have been brought into disrepute it is by the way its members are ratting on each other making true the observation that the people whom you should most fear in politics are the people who are supposed to be on your side.

YouGov: Scottish SLUTS to blame for imminent break-up of the Union. DISGUSTING!

http://yougov.co.uk/news/2014/03/26/scottish-independence-women-push-yes-to-new-high/

The biggest shift has been among women. One of the features of the campaign so far has been the huge gender gap, with men only narrowly favouring the union, and women overwhelmingly opposed to independence. The gap remains big, but it is not as vast as it used to be. A month ago, women opposed independence by 68-32%; now the figure is 62-38%. Men divide 54-46% in favour of the union, little changed on our last two surveys.

What has happened? It’s not that there has been a surge in female support for the SNP. Their voting intentions for Holyrood are virtually unchanged.

Nor is it that women are coming round to the belief that they will personally better off in an independent Scotland. Just 17% expect this, much the same as the 16% we recorded when we last asked this question in December. Far more, 40%, expect to be worse off.

What has changed is what women expect for Scotland as a whole. Three months ago, 52% of women thought Scotland’s economy would suffer under independence, while just 22% expected things to improve – a vast 30-point chasm. Today, the gap has almost halved to 18 points, with 45% of women fearing that the economy would get worse, and 27% expecting it to get better. Once again, there has been little shift in the answers men give (33% worse, 44% better in our latest survey).

One possible explanation for the shift among Scotland’s women is that Alex Salmond has acted on past warnings of his lack of female support for independence. He has unveiled a new strategy for child care, offering a significant expansion if Holyrood wins full powers to tax and spend as it pleased.

It’s not often that a single policy statement changes votes. It is more likely that Salmond’s new policy has helped to counter a more widespread, perhaps sub-conscious, sense that independence is a macho project with risks that men are more willing to take. It could be that some women, hitherto nervous about independence, find a reassurance in Salmond’s child care policy that goes beyond the specific benefits that would go to families with young children.

What is to be done?

I urge Ann Coulter to visit Britain to propose the abolition of female suffrage, before they cause any more damage. We all know British females are infamously promiscuous and that most British mothers are SSMs.

https://www.facebook.com/pages/Should-Spinster-Single-Mothers-be-lashed-100-times/417696111659379?ref=ts&fref=ts

http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/uknews/2285670/Most-children-of-British-mothers-born-out-of-wedlock.html

Even if the Home Secretary (female) subjects her to an exclusion order it would still be worth the exercise, just to make a point.

Please, Ann, come, speak to us, and save the Scotties from Scottish SSMs bribed by Shrek, who wants to be King Alex of Scotland! They are stupid and don't know what they are doing, like most British people. The Old World needs you!

http://www.christian.org.uk/news/scots-teen-abortion-percentage-second-highest-in-world/
http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-scotland-22691282
http://www.christian.org.uk/news/scots-kids-suffering-as-half-born-to-unmarried-parents/

http://thevoiceofreason-ann.blogspot.co.uk/2014/05/suggested-itinerary-for-ann-coulters.html
Ann's proposed Itinerary for her UK trip

UKIP candidate Diane James a little too serious to become MP? Claire Khaw is a bit of a comedienne ...

http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/newsvideo/uk-politics-video/9901805/Eastleigh-by-election-Conservative-candidate-Maria-Hutchings-speechless-at-third-place.html

Defeated Conservative candidate looks completely out of it as she is being bundled out of the polling station.  Hope she is OK.  Her party certainly isn't.

If UKIP are thinking they have done well, let me tell them now that it is far too early to be complacent at being second.

UKIP - always too little too late and prone to premature complacency.

They need the white heat of Claire Khaw in their party to propel them into the forefront of British politics.

If they are not sure if the British voter would take to her they should commission a YouGov poll. 

Avowedly libertarian UKIP could be bankrolled by tobacco companies instead of the being in the pocket of the EU

WHAT I WANT THE BACCY COMPANIES TO DO FOR ME IN RETURN FOR HELPING THEM

http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/business-19264245

Australia's highest court has upheld a new government law on mandatory packaging for cigarettes that removes brand colours and logos from packaging.

http://www.asiantribune.com/news/2012/05/21/campaign-tobacco-free-kids-honors-australia-attorney-general-nicola-roxon-leadership

Campaign for Tobacco-Free Kids Honors Australia Attorney-General Nicola Roxon for Leadership in Fighting Tobacco and Saving Lives

http://www.couriermail.com.au/news/opinion/comment-nicola-roxons-law-runs-smoke-rings-around-last-gasp-court-bid/story-e6frerc6-1226451250541

Australia's first female attorney-general - an unconscionable and blatant display of judicial bias in a kangaroo court?

UKIP claims to be a libertarian party.  I rang Gawain Towler today burbling eagerly and breathlessly about my wonderful idea for UKIP to get funding from the tobacco companies by staunchly supporting their right to sell their goods with their design and packaging free of the disgusting propaganda and photographs matriarchy warning us of death and disease.

Predictably disappointing as they always are, I was told that UKIP will be afraid of being seen to be helping the Big Bad Tobacco Companies, and that the Big Bag Tobacco Companies will be afraid of being seen to have anything to do with a party that is stuffed with anti-immigration but middle class people who just about manage to get away with denying that they are racists and Islamophobes, who are said to be cranks and gadflies.   

But, as Maggie Thatcher would have said, THERE IS NO ALTERNATIVE!

The fraidy UKIP and the fraidy baccy companies need to get together in order to fight Big Sister.   

It will be all right, boys, I shall come to your rescue!

To make sure that the baccy companies have their interests properly defended by at least one political party in one country, I need to myself be in UKIP myself to oversee things as Policy Consultant and Directrix of Communications.  

Unfortunately, I am not a member of UKIP and there is a bar against ex-BNP members joining so that they are not contaminated by working class racists. UKIP are renowned for their cowardice however and, although they already know that I can be no other than a civic nationalist, they will doubtless continue to pretend I am a racist and exclude me on that ground because they will find the radicalism of my ideas too high risk for their easily offended and easily frightened voters.   Their strategy appears to be that of boring the voter to death. It does not make sense, but there we are.  

UKIP might just admit me if they can be assured of that my admission will increase their vote.   

There is a scientific way of demonstrating this through a YouGov poll but the cost of this would start from around £15,000 + VAT,  I was told by Joe Twyman of YouGov.  

If Philip Morris, BAT and Imperial were to go thirds on this, then we can then get on with the business of breaking out of the suffocating embrace of the nanny state.   

I am aware that I may be in need of a bit of reputation management, and the Public Relations Consultants Association http://www.prca.org.uk/ has recommended to me Phil Hall Associates at http://www.pha-media.com/.   I actually approached Max Clifford a while back and he gave me the impression that he would not touch me with a bargepole, doubtless because of my transgressive anti-feminist views, rather than my alleged racism.  I get along perfectly well with Muslims too.    

If it is felt necessary for me to have my reputation managed, then the three baccy companies could go thirds on their fees too.   I think I can manage it perfectly well myself, however, but don't mind giving people business where this is warranted.  

Once I am firmly ensconced in UKIP and made Directrix of Communications and Policy Consultant, we will see some improvement in the political fortunes of those who want smaller more rational government.   

I really do not want to be leader at all, as long as I have control of policy and propaganda.   

It really has to be pointed out that UKIP's policy of contemptible cowardice on every major issue has not worked.   We need to light a fire under their tail and I am the only person to do it.   

Apart from this issue, I will be advising the Republican Party to propose a policy which has the objective of disenfranchising as many women as possible, especially if they are never married single mothers (or SSMs as I call them, which is short for Slut Single Mums).  This is done by requiring all voters to pay a minimum of tax.  http://thebattlefieldoflove.blogspot.co.uk/2012/08/what-republican-party-should-propose-to.html

Anyone who has examined the totalitarian and suffocating nature of Big Sister government in any detail will know that it is always fear of alienating the female vote that prevents any recognisably libertarian measure for ever being implemented in the Western world.  It is now time to tell feminism to fuck off, once and for all, before they do more and worse than stop baccy companies from selling their wares using their own unique packaging.   

What is the purpose of stopping us from smoking anyway?

Our governments say it is because smokers cost the NHS.   Very well then, abolish the NHS, and let nature take  its course.   

If the government lets us all indulge our vices and allowed nature to take its course, then there would be fewer demented, old and ill people around being bed-blockers and a drain on the NHS.  The next generation would be better off too rather than being compelled into thinking of ways to euthanasing us when we start really getting in the way.     

So, even if you took the government's reasoning at face value to save us from being a burden on the NHS with our smoking-related diseases, it would only cause us to hang around and get in the way of the next generation.  That does not make any medical, moral or social sense. 

The reason Western governments are now so fundamentally irrational is because of the matriarchy.

If a patriarchy is a society that condones male promiscuity, then a matriarchy is a society that condones and often positively awards female promiscuity, and the only good matriarchy is a dead matriarchy.   

Let us put down the matriarchy by telling feminism to fuck off, again and again and again and again until she cries and goes home.   

The cost of asking male Eurosceptics if they would be more likely to vote UKIP if I were a prominent member

Dear Ms Khaw,

Thanks for getting in touch.

We can look at different possible options for producing a survey such as this and the cost is likely to start at around £15,000 (+VAT).

Is this the sort of region you were thinking of?

Kind regards,

Joe

Joe Twyman

Director of Political and Social Research

 

50 Featherstone Street, London EC1Y 8RT

T +44 (0)20 7012 6000  F +44 (0)20 7012 6001

joet@yougov.com

www.yougov.com

Follow me on twitter: @JoeTwyman

From: Claire Khaw
Sent: 06 August 2012 12:46
To: Info_UK
Subject: Re: Poll: Would you be more or less likely to vote UKIP if Claire Khaw were a prominent member?

http://thevoiceofreason-ann.blogspot.co.uk/2012/05/orwell-prize-award-2012.html 

I have met Peter Kelner a number of times, but he probably won't remember me.  I do remember saying to him that I thought it was rather low of him to invite people to gamble with the points they earned on prizes they might never get.   

Claire Khaw

---

From: Claire Khaw
To: "info@yougov.co.uk"
Sent: Monday, 6 August 2012, 12:40
Subject: Poll: Would you be more or less likely to vote UKIP if Claire Khaw were a prominent member?

http://thevoiceofreason-ann.blogspot.co.uk/2012/08/would-you-be-more-likely-to-vote-for.html

How much would it cost me to ask this question of male UKIP supporters?

Claire Khaw

A question for UKIP supporters

http://www.ukip.org/helpukip

Membership is not available to anyone who is or has previously been a member of the British National Party, National Front, British Freedom Party, British People's Party, English Defence League, Britain First or the UK First Party. Any applications made from people who are or have been members of these organisations will be refused, and any subscriptions collected will be refunded.

By applying for membership you certify that you are not and have never been a member of either of these parties.

Would someone tell me the purpose of this restriction?


http://thebattlefieldoflove.blogspot.co.uk/2012/07/too-many-women-have-vote-and-solution.html
Too many women now have the vote and the solution is obvious

http://thevoiceofreason-ann.blogspot.co.uk/2012/08/would-you-be-more-likely-to-vote-for.html
Would you be more likely to vote UKIP/BNP if I were leader?

I will even pay for the YouGov poll to ask potential male supporters of UKIP and BNP (and only the male supporters) if they would be more or less likely to vote UKIP or BNP if I were leader.

Me looking benign and mumsy

Do you remember this man?  I like to think my style is reminiscent of his.  For years, I was in an adulterous relation with him.   But I would do it all over again (and, yes, be lashed 100 times for it too) for he taught me much and I did love him dearly. I hate all this name-dropping but it seems I might as well make political out of this before even his memory, and the memory of men like him, is lost forever.  I apologise in advance to his widow,  Lady Teresa, whose novels I actually enjoyed more than her husband's.  

http://www.amazon.co.uk/Kiss-Me-Chudleigh-According-Auberon/dp/1444711490/ref=sr_1_1?ie=UTF8&qid=1344254312&sr=8-1

Me looking magisterial

Proposed YouGov survey on whether UKIP should admit ex-BNP member Claire Khaw

Let me be quite clear about this: if the BNP were to offer to annul my expulsion and make me their Press Officer, I would accept with alacrity and pleasure.

This is probably not that likely, and I must be realistic and have a Plan B.  I therefore now find myself in the position of having to point out to UKIP that their prohibition against accepting anyone who was ever in the BNP is in fact ultra vires and illegal.  (This is explained at
http://thevoiceofreason-ann.blogspot.com/2011/10/ukip-to-readmit-claire-khaw-as-member.html)

Since I am not in fact prepared to sue them over this, I will just have to gently point out that the only legitimate and political reason they have not to admit me is if they believe that my being a member of UKIP would bring their party into disrepute.

While my admission would be regarded as controversial, it would serve to shake up the fuddy duddy sticks in mud both young and old in UKIP.

Of course, those who want me in the party will say that I would attract more votes, while those whom I have offended and the cowardly custards who fear to be associated with someone who was once a member of a party known to be "racist" will predictably claim that I would bring their party into disrepute.

To settle this question, I propose a YouGov survey asking the following questions.

1. Before this survey, had you heard of Claire Khaw, the Chinese ex-BNP member who was expelled for things said on the Victoria Derbyshire Show about Riven Vincent?  (Transcript at http://thevoiceofreason-ann.blogspot.com/2011/07/transcript-of-what-i-said-on-victoria.html)
2. If you had heard of her, was your impression of her favourable?
3. If you had not heard of her until now, do you think you would be more likely to vote UKIP if she became a member of UKIP?

If the majority of answers are YES then it would become obvious that I should be admitted and be made Press Officer.  

I shall of course shave off my beard the moment UKIP admit me and  make me Press Officer, and that's a promise I intend to keep.

All who wish UKIP to admit me should write to

Steve Harris
Officer
FOR THE ATTENTION OF THE REGIONAL COMMITTEE CHAIRMAN

The Old Grain Store
Church Lane
Lyminister
West Sussex
BN17 7 QJ

Those who wish to nominate me for the iPM New Year's Honours will find all the information they require at http://thevoiceofreason-ann.blogspot.com/2011/11/nominate-claire-khaw-for-ipm-new-years.html

How I would govern as Dictator of Britain and the use of AV to elect me

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dictator

http://thevoiceofreason-ann.blogspot.com/2011/04/let-us-have-democratically-elected.html

Should such a Dictator be elected using AV or FPTP?  I would suggest AV to make this dictatorial candidate work harder to position himself (or herself) on a broader popular base.   I am confident that I can do this reasonably well.

Please note that I would not abolish elections.  Even Dictators need to know how they are doing to stay in power and elections are required to let the ruler know what the governed think of his (or her) policies.  

In fact, I would allow the burning of effigies of myself because that would be a good way of knowing how much one is hated and give a dictator a chance to mend his (or her) ways.

http://thevoiceofreason-ann.blogspot.com/2011/04/khaws-dolls-and-effigies-for-voodoo.html

A quick request of how many effigies of me have been ordered would be a much quicker way of knowing what my people think of me than commissioning some hugely expensive YouGov or MORI poll.

Clara Khavius would be the Latin version of my name.   

YouGov poll on immigration flawed

Below is a question from YouGov on immigration.

In which, if any, of the following ways would you say Britain has benefited from immigration? (Please tick all that apply.) 

1. Food 

2. Culture

3. Sport

4. The economy 

5. Other ways

6. Not applicable, I do not believe Britain has benefited from immigration in any way

7. Don’t know

You can tick (1), (2), (3), (4), (5) individually.

But if you tick (6) or (7) then only (6) or (7) can show.

What if you are BNP but think there are benefits but it is a question of numbers, and resent the fact that you are branded a Nazi Fascist racist evil extremist bigot if you dare to complain about immigration?

I had to answer (7) ie Don't know.


An impossible question for many to answer accurately and truthfully!

Why should politicians who vote to invade another country be surprised at a violent reaction?

http://www.naba.org.uk/CONTENT/TheAssociation/Parliament/MPs_Vote_War_on_Iraq.pdf
lists all the MPs who voted to invade Iraq.

http://www.mirror.co.uk/news/latest/2010/11/02/murder-bid-woman-had-list-of-mps-115875-22685471/

http://www.dailyexpress.co.uk/posts/view/209683/Muslim-hate-website-must-remove-list-of-pro-war-MPs-/

http://www.revolutionmuslim.com/
is where the list of MPs who voted to invade Iraq was said to be found, along with instructions on how to meet your MP at surgery and where to buy knives, presumably to facilitate the stabbing thereof.  But I couldn't find it. 

At least Ms Choudhry exhibited thought processes that followed a certain logic: you hate the war, so you punish the people who started the violence in the only way they can understand: with violence in return.

MPs who have so far not been stabbed and do not wish to be stabbed by their Muslim constituents for the disastrous, disgraceful,  unwinnable and unpopular war that they voted for could always publicly recant, express their deep remorse, and perhaps explain the circumstances under which they came to make their regrettable decision.

Perhaps they had their arms twisted by their party whips?

You should write to and demand that your MP support Peter Bone's House of Commons Disqualification Act.  If they do not you will know what to think of them and withhold your vote accordingly at the next election.  


http://services.parliament.uk/bills/2010-11/houseofcommonsdisqualificationamendment.html
contains details of the Bill. 

http://thevoiceofreason-ann.blogspot.com/2010/10/peter-bone-mps-proposal-to-abolish.html

I am thinking of commissioning a poll with YouGov on the following lines:

1. Do you think the quality of democracy in this country could be improved? 
2. Do you think the reason why politicians are so cowardly and hypocritical is because they are frightened of being demoted by their leader? 
3. Do you think the reason why they are so unpopular is because they are perceived as cowardly and hypocritical? 
4. Would you be prepared to assist them in becoming less cowardly and hypocritical by sending a letter to your MP demanding that he help himself and his constituents by supporting Peter Bone's Bill?  (This Bill proposes to abolish the position of the party whip.)
5.  Do you know what a whip does to an MP when he is required to make him vote against his principles and conscience and vote as his or her leader demands?  
6. Do you know that the tactics involved in making this recalcitrant MP vote as the leader would wish amounts to blackmail and threats? 
7. Do you think an MP who is vulnerable to threats and blackmail is in a position to serve your interests and the nation's? 
8. Do you think an MP free from threats and blackmail would be in a better position to serve your interests and the nation's? 
9. Did you approve of the invasion of Iraq and Afghanistan? 
10. Were you aware that the whips were used to blackmail or threaten to make MPs vote as the leader of their party wished and against their better judgment? 
11. Do you think your MP should support Peter Bone's House of Commons Disqualification Bill?

MP expenses claims: Gallows in Parliament Square as opinion polling

http://www.metro.co.uk/news/article.html?Expenses:_Breakdown_of_all_the_big_claims&in_article_id=656463&in_page_id=34

http://www.wikihow.com/Build-a-Gallows (how to, very easy apparently)

http://www.timesonline.co.uk/tol/news/uk/article670403.ece (gallows story hoax, apparently)

http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/england/suffolk/4754515.stm (photo of gallows builder, John Lucas with pic of gallows in background)

http://www.guardian.co.uk/uk/2006/may/29/world.patrickbarkham

http://lancasteruaf.blogspot.com/2009/04/breaking-news-suffolk-bnp-candidate.html (arrest of John Lucas, BNP MEP candidate)

http://britishnationalism.org/?p=187 (David Lucas, BNP MEP candidate)

http://www.guardian.co.uk/politics/2009/may/14/elliot-morley-mortgage-expenses (picture of Elliot Morley)

http://www.parliament-square.org.uk/contacts.html (contact details of Brian Haw, who has camped there since 2 June 2001)

Elliot Morley is in such deep do-do over claiming interest on a mortgage he has already paid off that he has been suspended by the Labour Party.

At least he cannot use the tired old excuse that it was "all within the rules". Dark mutterings of fraud have been heard.

I wonder if there is any law that prohibits the ostentatious erection of multiple gallows in Parliament Square.

They could be added and taken off according to how the populace feel about the performance of our political classes. It may be more effective than getting YouGov to poll us.

A poll on this can be found at

http://www.1party4all.co.uk/Home/Account/TopicForm.aspx?topicsId=133

Frankly, if I lived in the Eastern Region, I would be voting for David Lucas, the BNP MEP candidate, for his enterprise and advocacy of the death penalty and his skill in the building and exporting of gallows, if not for his disgusting beard. I wonder if he is still single. I know the best men - even those with horrible beards - are usually already taken.

Vote BNP in the Euro elections.

You know you want to.

http://www.democracyforum.co.uk/talk-about-anything/61187-gallows-parliament-square-opinion-polling.html

http://tv.bnp.org.uk/2009/06/fascism-in-britain-the-case-of-david-lucas/ - David Lucas arrested on trumped-up charges?